BackTable / ENT / Article
Pathway to Cochlear Implants for Congenital Hearing Loss
Iman Iqbal • Updated Sep 27, 2024 • 33 hits
Cochlear implants have revolutionized treatment for congenital hearing loss, offering children the potential to develop auditory skills and improve their quality of life. For children identified with hearing loss early, often between three and six months, this technology can provide significant benefits. However, the process of evaluating and preparing a child for cochlear implantation is intricate and requires input from a multidisciplinary team. This involves not only medical evaluations but also a careful consideration of the child’s neurological, behavioral, and social circumstances.
This article explores how these factors, alongside the family's goals and expectations, shape the decision-making process for cochlear implantation. It also highlights the challenges and complexities faced when determining if a cochlear implant is the right choice for a child, including newer advances like single-sided deafness implants and the importance of long-term family support. This article features excerpts from the BackTable ENT Podcast with otolaryngologists Dr. Rachel St. John and Dr. Walter Kutz. You can listen to the full podcast below.
The BackTable ENT Brief
• Children typically undergo evaluation for cochlear implants after failing newborn hearing screenings or due to conditions like CMV (cytomegalovirus) that cause progressive hearing loss.
• The evaluation involves consultations with otologists, ophthalmologists, genetic testing, imaging, and vaccination, with input from psychologists and social workers to ensure holistic care.
• Vaccination against meningitis, particularly with Prevnar 13 and Pneumovax, is essential due to the increased risk associated with cochlear implants.
• Absolute contraindications for cochlear implants include the absence of a cochlea or auditory nerve, though some children may still benefit from limited sound awareness in exceptional cases.
• Severe neurological conditions or behavioral issues may limit the benefits of cochlear implants, leading to discussions about alternative communication methods, like sign language, which is often encouraged alongside implants.
• Cochlear implants have recently been approved for single-sided deafness in children aged five and older, opening new possibilities for children with progressive hearing loss.
Table of Contents
(1) Pathway to Cochlear Implants: Evaluation, Vaccination & Family Support
(2) Contraindications of Cochlear Implants & Emerging Applications
Pathway to Cochlear Implants: Evaluation, Vaccination & Family Support
The process of evaluating and preparing children for cochlear implants is quite comprehensive. First, children are identified with hearing loss early, around three to six months old, typically after failing a newborn hearing screen or due to progressive conditions like CMV. The evaluation includes consultations with otologists and ophthalmologists, as well as genetic testing and imaging. Imaging is done mainly through MRIs, with CT scans used in cases of inner ear abnormalities or concerns regarding facial nerves. Vaccination is also a critical part of this process, as children with cochlear implants are at a higher risk of meningitis. Typically children are vaccinated with Prevnar 13 and/or Pneumovax.
Before cochlear implant surgery, the multidisciplinary team, including a psychologist, social worker, and cochlear implant audiologist, meets with the patient and family at least twice. These meetings help assess the child’s suitability for the implant and ensure the family is prepared for the responsibilities post-surgery. The ideal age for implantation is around one year, as early intervention improves outcomes. Children implanted after three years of age typically show reduced success with the implant. Furthermore, behavioral and neurological factors may complicate the decision-making process, so the team evaluates each case to determine if the implant will provide the expected benefits. It is also essential to communicate with the family that cochlear implants do not restore typical hearing, and children's responses to activation vary widely, from excitement to fear.
The team's role extends after surgery, guiding families through the entire cochlear implant process. Families are connected to support networks to provide peer support from other parents with deaf or hard-of-hearing children, helping them navigate the emotional and practical aspects of the journey.
[Dr. Gopi Shah]
What does the evaluation look like for these patients who are born with congenital hearing loss and who will ultimately end up getting a cochlear implant?
[Dr. Walter Kutz]
We've set up a really nice multidisciplinary team, which I think is essential, especially for children. They'll typically come in, they'll fill their newborn hearing screen, or they may come in later because of CMV or some other progressive hearing loss. I would say most of our kids come in, they're six months of age, been identified, or even three months of age. Then we typically have two meetings.
It's a multidisciplinary clinic. They'll come in, they'll meet the otologist, which would be myself or three other of the otologists in the practice. We always have the patient see Dr. St. John because of her input. I think it's a good checks and balances to make sure we've done all the testing. We want to do imaging. Typically, we get an MRI. The only time I get a CT scan is if there's some inner ear abnormalities. I'm worried about a facial nerve or something of that sort.
Then we'll have them see ophthalmology, do genetic testing, we'll get an EKG, and that's going to be our typical workup. I think by having seen Dr. St. John in our clinic a couple of times, we make sure to get all that covered.
We're also very careful these kids get vaccinated. They need to have their Prevnar 13, which is part of the normal vaccines until two years of age. When they're two years of age, they'll get a Pneumovax as well because with a cochlear implant, these kids have a higher risk of meningitis.
…
Then at the meeting, it's going to be an otologist, a cochlear implant audiologist, we have a psychologist to meet with the family, a social worker. The team will generally meet with the patient twice.
One, we want to make sure the patient is a good cochlear implant candidate. We want to make sure they're going to-- The real work of the cochlear implant journey starts after the surgery. That's when the kids have to wear the implant, the parents have to be supportive. A lot of these young kids are just saying, "I don't want to wear it." That first week or two, the parent has to make sure the child's wearing the cochlear implant all the time.
We want to make sure they understand some of those issues. There could be behavioral issues, a child could have autism, they may have some other severe neurologic problems that may not be a great cochlear implant, they're just not going to be able to do anything with that input. It can be very complex decision-making. That's how we do it. Two clinic visits with our multidisciplinary team, and it seems to work pretty well.
[Dr. Gopi Shah]
What's the average age of implant for most patients?
[Dr. Walter Kutz]
We try to get them implanted by one year of age if they're Medicaid. If they have private insurance, we'll try to get them even sooner, 9 to 12 months of age. That doesn't always happen, unfortunately. There's some socioeconomic issues that come up, but we do the best we can. The earlier you can implant a child with severe-to-profound bilateral hearing loss, the better they're going to do.
Once they get over three years of age, I think their potential for being an excellent cochlear implant user really starts to decline. Average age, hopefully, we implant them by one year of age. I'm sure it's a little older than that, but that's what we shoot for.
[Dr. Rachel St. John]
One thing we've been doing with CI team, which I have found incredibly helpful, and I hope Dr. Kutz has as well, is that we do a monthly multidisciplinary team meeting by-- well, now by Zoom with COVID, which is I think made it a lot easier, honestly, in terms of scheduling. That's where we actually look at cases that are particularly more complicated, whether it's ethical, psychosocial, medical, all of the above.
We've had a case of a child who had unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. She actually had access to language, but she was deaf in one ear, and mom was really looking for a cochlear implant, and helping her understand that that wasn't going to change that child's access to language because she had the one ear that typically, that wasn't necessarily going to change the child's trajectory.
Having a multidisciplinary meeting where we all reviewed the case and reviewed what had been done and reviewed what mom had been coming to the team with, was really helpful, or families that have been declined elsewhere and are seeking a second opinion. I think I found that to be incredibly valuable, both in helping families with appropriate expectations. Then also, sometimes we will talk about things and say, "Okay, do we have a policy when we have a particular situation like this? How do we tend to handle it? What's our database to norm?" Sometimes it's easy and sometimes it's stuff we haven't seen before. It's a first time. I think that's been a really helpful part of the CI multidisciplinary process.
…
I think it's very important for families to know that it can look just like YouTube where they turn it on and the baby lights up like a Christmas tree and everybody cries and laughs and claps. It's great. It can also look, the baby can be absolutely petrified and break down or just get really quiet and scared. Those are all typical responses. They are all expected. That first time that a baby hears sound, we don't know what they're going to do.
If parents don't know that and they have watched all the pretty YouTube-- because the babies crying when the cochlear implant is turned on, those don't make it to YouTube. You are not going to find those, but they're very important. That's a very normal expected response for a child who's experiencing something completely new for the first time. For families to know that it's okay if the baby freaks out a little bit, that little thing is so important.
I've had parents come to me with cochlear implants in a bag right after they've been activated and said the baby gets so upset. I'm like, "Okay, let's put one on and we're going to cry. It's going to happen. Then we're going to just keep talking, and then we're going to let the baby get used to it. Then we're going to be okay. Then we'll put the other one on. The baby's probably going to cry again." There's a process there.
I think a lot of what I do is helping families understand what is the range of outcomes. Cochlear implants have never been better. The technology has never been better. The surgical technique is continuing to evolve. It doesn't mean it's going to be hearing like the parents have. We know that. It's not a bionic ear. We might get there one day, but we're not there yet. Understanding that children are all unique, and so there's a range of potential outcomes.
We're shooting for access to listening and spoken language. Depending on the risk factors involved, we expect to get there, but we also have to be prepared for the fact that that may not happen. It's not to be doom and gloom with families, but just to make sure that they don't have this expectation that we're going to put this thing on and we're going to turn it on and everything's fine.
When we talked about this on the last episode, you have a deaf child and they will always be a deaf child no matter what we do. Helping families embrace that and helping their child embrace that, that's my job. Getting deaf role models involved, hooking parents up with family support programs like Texas Hands & Voices, which is just a bunch of other parents with deaf and hard of hearing kids.
Listen to the Full Podcast
Stay Up To Date
Follow:
Subscribe:
Sign Up:
Contraindications of Cochlear Implants & Emerging Applications
Absolute contraindications for cochlear implants include the absence of a cochlea, as there would be no place to position the implant. Additionally, a missing auditory nerve is traditionally considered a contraindication, but in some cases, limited benefits such as sound awareness or pattern recognition have been reported. In certain situations, auditory fibers may be traveling on other nerves, like the vestibular or facial nerve, and the decision to proceed with implantation can depend on the surgeon's discretion and the team's evaluation.
Severe neurological conditions may not be absolute contraindications, but they raise concerns about the potential benefits of an implant. In these cases, discussions between the team and the family are crucial to set realistic expectations, as the surgery involves risks like general anesthesia and the potential for meningitis. It may sometimes be more appropriate to explore alternative communication methods, such as sign language, which can be beneficial regardless of the child’s hearing status. Some families prioritize environmental sound awareness for safety or engagement, even when the implant might not provide the expected improvements in speech or language comprehension. Each case is highly individualized, with the team guiding families through the decision-making process based on their specific goals and the child's unique needs.
Cochlear implants have also recently been approved for single-sided deafness in children aged five and older. While still under exploration, this option may benefit children with conditions like congenital CMV, where hearing loss often starts in one ear and progresses to both. Early implantation in such cases could provide substantial benefits, and families should be referred to cochlear implant centers to fully understand their options.
[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Dr. Kutz, are there any absolute contraindications for a cochlear implant? I guess if there's no nerve.
[Dr. Walter Kutz]
Interestingly, that's a great question. If there's no cochlea, definitely a contraindication. We have done implants for kids that there's no visible nerve and there's been reports in our study, kids had no visible nerve. They really maybe got some pattern awareness. That could have been more of a sensation than an auditory signal. There have been other reports where some kids have gotten some very limited closed-set speech. That's traditionally been a contraindication is a totally absent nerve on imaging.
If there's an internal ear canal, there's a cochlea, there's a chance cochlear fibers could be traveling on the vestibular nerve or even the facial nerve. I think that's a little bit of the discretion of the surgeon in the cochlear implant team. If a patient has no cochlea, then there's nowhere to place the cochlear implant. Then we can get into the whole other episode about the brainstem implants for kids, which we won't get into that, but that's a possibility.
…
If a child has other severe neurologic disorders, we have to decide what are our expectations. You can never guess that 100%. We don't have the crystal ball we'd like to have.
You really do need to talk to parents. "Listen, we're putting your child under a two-hour general anesthetic with a $30,000 implant. That does have risks, although they're low risk for surgery. There's a risk of meningitis and other problems. As a team, we think the benefit is going to be extremely limited." It's always, in my opinion, very difficult to have that conversation and to be like, "It may be best to look at alternative ways of communication besides a cochlear implant for your child." Of course, that's a discussion between the family and the team.
I don't know that's an absolute contraindication, but there are some reasons you may not want to pursue a cochlear implant despite having normal anatomy and these sort of things.
[Dr. Rachel St. John]
I just really quickly would just say, too, that it's one of those things where it's very kid-related, but it's also very parent expectation-related because we've had parents who have said, "Environmental awareness of sound is really important to us and our kid." Maybe that's not the goal that we would all ideally want, but that can actually be really important for a family. It can be important for safety. It can be important for engagement.
Dr. Kutz knows this. I encourage families to pursue multiple avenues of language regardless of what they're doing. Whether they get a cochlear implant or hearing aids or whatever or don't, I always support sign language being involved because there's not really a big downside to bilingualism.
For some kids, that's going to be more critical because we do have to be really honest with families and say, "We're not here to tell you, no, this is not allowed, but here's what we're seeing on imaging and we're seeing with your child. Your kid, it rubs their head on their chair all day long and you can't keep a hearing aid on. A cochlear implant's probably functionally not going to help them a whole lot." We do have to be really honest about that.
I agree with Dr. Kutz, that's a hard discussion, but we've had kids whose parents have elected to get cochlear implants with minimal gain. Sometimes I look at that and go, wow, that's a long way to go to get it. Then this child is just so happy with that input and that little bit of increased awareness and connection with others, even if they're not using it to understand or speak language. I have to give that a lot of respect because that child's existence looks really different, in the same way that sometimes parents say, "That is not worth it to us."
[Dr. Ashley Agan]
Everyone's different.
[Dr. Walter Kutz]
If I can add one quick point about cochlear implants, the cochlear implants have recently been approved for single-sided deafness. We've done a few kids with single-sided deafness. We've done a few kids with single-sided deafness. Again, that's a whole nother episode, but just for the audience to be aware, that is something that's going to be the next-- a few years, I think we'll really sort out when a child may be a good candidate for single-sided deafness cochlear implantation.
Right now, they have to pay approvals for five years of age. Sometimes we'll do things off-label, but I think that's something to be aware of and something that the family should at least know about it. If they want to have more questions answered, I think it'd be important to refer them to a cochlear implant center so they can at least be informed of what the options may be.
[Dr. Rachel St. John]
I think that's going to be huge for our congenital CMV kids because they often will start with unilateral changes, and then progress to include bilateral. That's a group that would benefit from an early unilateral implant. If we know that that other ear potentially may change, that might be really helpful for them. It's a great point.
Podcast Contributors
Dr. Rachel St. John
Dr. Rachel St. John is a practicing ENT and Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine at Children's Medical Center Dallas/UTSW Department of Otolaryngology.
Dr. Joe Walter Kutz
Dr. Joe Walter Kutz is a neurotologist and Professor of Otolaryngology and Neurosurgery at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, TX.
Dr. Gopi Shah
Dr. Gopi Shah is a pediatric otolaryngologist and the co-host of BackTable ENT.
Dr. Ashley Agan
Dr. Ashley Agan is an otolaryngologist in Dallas, TX.
Cite This Podcast
BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2021, February 16). Ep. 16 – Congenital Hearing Loss [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com
Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.