top of page

BackTable / ENT / Podcast / Transcript #169

Podcast Transcript: Navigating Type I Laryngeal Clefts in Children

with Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim

In this episode, Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim, pediatric airway surgeon and Associate Professor at the University of Alberta, joins host Dr. Gopi Shah to review laryngeal clefts in children. You can read the full transcript below and listen to this episode here on BackTable.com.

Table of Contents

(1) Laryngeal Cleft: The Basics

(2) Patient Presentation of Laryngeal Cleft

(3) Physical Exam Strategies to Assess Laryngeal Cleft

(4) The Role of DLB in Assessing Laryngeal Cleft

(5) Performing DLB in Children with Laryngeal Cleft

(6) Strategies for Laryngeal Cleft Repair

(7) Post-Operative Management of Laryngeal Cleft Repair

(8) Additional Challenges Associated with Severe Laryngeal Clefts

(9) Caring for Families Affected by Laryngeal Cleft

Listen While You Read

Navigating Type I Laryngeal Clefts in Children with Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim on the BackTable ENT Podcast)
Ep 169 Navigating Type I Laryngeal Clefts in Children with Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim
00:00 / 01:04

Stay Up To Date

Follow:

Subscribe:

Sign Up:

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Hello, everyone, and welcome to The BackTable ENT Podcast, where we discuss all things ENT. We bring you the best and brightest in our field with a hope that you can take something from our show to your practice. My name is Gopi Shah, and I'm your host today. I'm a pediatric ENT. I have an awesome guest. I have Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim. He is a pediatric otolaryngologist practicing at the University of Alberta in Canada.

He's a pediatric otolaryngology fellowship director and the clinical research director for the Department of Surgery. Dr. El-Hakim is also the lead physician of the Aerodigestive and Aspiration Program at the Stollery Children's Hospital. He is here today to talk to us about laryngeal clefts in children. Welcome to the show, Hamdy. How are you?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
I am fine. Thank you very much for having me, Gopi.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
As we get started, we usually let our guest tell us a little bit about themselves and their practice.

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
Well, I am best described as you have done. I am one of five pediatric otolaryngologists in the Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Canada, the best-kept secret in the whole of the country, living-wise, practice-wise. I graduated in Egypt and I trained there for a brief period of time and then in the UK. Then I had the honor of going through fellowship training in Toronto Sick Children's Hospital.

Then since 2002, I have landed in Edmonton, nascent and promising. I am really at the last few years in my career, so I have the luxury of looking back and creating some narrative on how the stories unfolded and how I have served. No regrets. I am a traveler and a discoverer, and it's all in search of a little bit more of a role and service to children and a little bit of more of knowledge as well.

(1) Laryngeal Cleft: The Basics

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
That's great. I love your curiosity and how much you enjoy exploring, even after 20-plus years of practice. I think that's wonderful. Today, my goal is to get as much insight from you and your experience about laryngeal clefts in children. I find these patients can be difficult to understand, diagnose. I think of it, maybe this isn't the best comparison, but I think of it like tongue tie, just because it's there may not always cause anything. Sometimes, if it's there, how does it play a role to the overall picture? I'm really excited about this topic. First, let's just start with how do you explain laryngeal cleft to families, and how do you classify them?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
I usually start by saying that the esophagus and the trachea or the windpipe and the gullet initially were one project, and they usually decide to split and go their own ways in terms of the role for swallowing and breathing. Laryngeal cleft is essentially a low ramp in between the two entries, and it can get deeper and deeper, and the lesser fortunate are the ones who have a deeper one.

In terms of swallowing, I always like to explain to them that swallowing is a sequential domino-like process that basically starts in the mouth and ends up hopefully in the stomach safely. It has many factors that affect it, and we really need to take a holistic approach to the child. We need to make sure that breathing and swallowing are taken for granted and smooth as vision and hearing and a heartbeat. In terms of the structural abnormality, I don't talk about the structural abnormality until I find one.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
In terms of classification, if you're teaching the residents or your fellow, how do you describe the classification?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
I think the classic classification into four grades. I know that there are sub-classifications, but at the end of the day, the golden rule is never to depend on a flexible endoscopy. You have to do a rigid endoscopy. You have to instrument. It takes really no skill at all to pick grades two, three, and four, and lucky enough, they are pretty rare. If somebody talks about vast experience, I think they'd be lucky or maybe unfortunate. In terms of laryngeal cleft type one, it always reminds me of the myth of Loch Ness Monster to some extent. Some people say that they have seen it for certain, and others say it was the effect of the Scottish whiskey.

(2) Patient Presentation of Laryngeal Cleft

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
When patients come to you, how do they usually present? What symptoms will these patients have?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
That's probably the very important starting point in even science and research because it's a no-brainer usually to tell if there is an ear problem or a nose problem because, at the end of the day, it's symptom-specific. The symptom leads you quite comfortably to the organ unless there is a referred sensation, which we all get taught in our basic years. With swallowing and breathing, you have a common, let's call it cavity, which is the hypopharynx and the larynx. They are so intertwined anatomically and neurally, and you cannot always, especially in the classic age of presentation, tell which is affected and which is not.

Plus there is a little bit of a myth more or let's call it culture and education-specific, culture-specific interpretation of symptoms of a child who is maybe choking, maybe having problems during mealtime, between pickiness, refusal, behavior difficulties, sensory problems. You can get a child who has simple problems like coughing and watery eyes up to blue spells, limp episodes, or recurrent pneumonias. Even with the latter, you find that many people ascribe all of this to infections, run-of-the-mill.

It's the period of infancy and toddlerhood where you expect a bit of immune development and an immune education. People accept to some extent that there could be an RSV there or an adenovirus here, but it's the frequency. A healthy child should sit at mealtime and get funny photographs of smudging everybody and everything, but it ends up with a long drama, a bit of ritual in order to get this little one fed adequately and the mealtime over.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
It's interesting. I think of the younger newborns and infants, when I think of patients that might present with a blue spell or they come into the ER with having had to call the EMS because they turned blue at home, and now they're in the ER, and now we're getting into some of those questions about how they feed. Do you find that some of the symptoms differ by age? What do you find in your toddlers or even your older kids?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
This is a tricky one because from research across the board, you'll find that the age of presentation is within the first probably six to nine months, and that also gets adjusted when you extrapolate it to the date of surgery. The date of surgery or bronchoscopy is usually around year one, which means essentially that there is time lag and delay. The older ones usually will have some form of a relationship to a lucky respirologist, and preschool asthma is a common tag for those children.

As a matter of fact, my first successful laryngeal cleft repair was a little girl who was five at the time, and she spent her first five years with monthly visits to the Stollery Emergency Department. After we did that repair, and I must admit that I skeptically has performed it, the family reported a dramatic improvement, and that was my conversion.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
That's amazing. Have you ever found a laryngeal cleft unidentified in like a older child, like 8 or 10, 6 year old? Or is that just at this point now we know enough about it, we have enough studies, better understanding of swallow, so we tend to catch it earlier?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
I think we're too early to say that we have established a knowledge base and the practice base across even in North America, which is a little bit more ahead, further ahead of the rest of the world in terms of aerodigestive practices. The argument is always, you sometimes see laryngeal clefts without symptoms related to it. That means that you have brought the child from the street and put them under anesthetic and did the bronchoscopy because they didn't have any symptoms. To some extent that narrative is hard to buy.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Do these kids have risk factors? Do these babies, have you found that it's more common in our term babies or, hey, this is actually more common in our preemies or?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
I like to draw the parallel with sensorineural hearing loss. We basically have a swath of patients who have sensory hearing loss and they do not have any other neurological problem. We have a good drill in terms of saying whether they were preemies, cardiac, had meningitis, et cetera. The same applies for the patients with swallowing problem. Again, we have to understand that swallowing problems are not as clearly classified and identified as sensory versus neural and even conductive hearing loss.

To lump and start to control and identify risk factors that are directly responsible aside from famous midline abnormalities, like I, yesterday, was in the OR looking after one patient and the general surgeon was going to examine a TE fistula patient and operate on them. They said, "As long as you're here, why not perform a bronchoscopy?" I had a look, which in many situations and in many centers, pediatric general surgeons will actually perform the examination.

I located the TE fistula for him, but there was a type 1 cleft. Now, that is so subtle and outside the scope of their practice, no disrespect, because they are not laryngologists, and they will miss many of those. In terms of other risk factors, I can't really tell that a laryngeal cleft in particular is my main focus. My focus is more into what we call swallowing problem and dysphagia. I don't think I am that as obsessed by finding and detecting the laryngeal cleft as much as I am trying to explain why can't that child swallow.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Going back to symptoms, we think of swallowing problems, we think of, as you mentioned, coughing, choking, sort of watery eyes reflective of a choking episode. Do you ever have other symptoms, like something like throat clearing or, sleep-disordered breathing? Any other symptoms that aren't necessarily "swallowing" or there's more to swallowing than choking as well? Maybe they make a funny face. What else do you think of in terms of symptoms?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
That definitely is an interesting one because you've mentioned snoring. Half of my first 140 children snored, and I don't touch their tonsils and their adenoids. Granted, a good number of them, about 65% of this cohort had an airway abnormality. They had either tracheal stenosis, believe it or not, or malacia or subglottic stenosis. After I work also on the swallowing, quite often without an airway abnormality being corrected, the parents tell me the child has stopped snoring. The lesson is that sleep-disordered breathing can actually be mediated, not necessarily by an obstructive lesion, but by a compromise to respiratory reserve.

In terms of the other symptoms like throat clearing, now that is a nebulous symptom. It can be because of many reasons. Most people will also look at post-nasal drip, try and identify another Loch Ness monster, which is gastroesophageal reflux disease, and that would lead you to really a cochlea, an endless cochlea of discussions, especially with gastroenterologists who are, obviously, the masters of the art and the benchmark creators for it. I'm careful a little bit about those. It usually is more in an older child, so the story will have been forgotten where was the trigger.

What I worry about, and maybe in context, is the constantly rattly child. This is a child who cannot clear probably saliva. That needs a combination of inquiries. Part of them may relate to esophagitis, definitely. I quite often see it in association with a child who have atypical croup, has a good number of these are associated with eosinophilic esophagitis or motility problems in the esophagus. I must admit our center has not really invested enough in motility investigations, partly because the age group does not really lend itself to a motility investigation and a motility test. There are centers in the United States who are far ahead in that respect.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Just to recap, in terms of risk factors, we're always thinking of possible associated tracheoesophageal fistula, potentially other secondary airway abnormalities. You said half your cohort had tracheal stenosis as well as subglottic stenosis. Then in terms of other GI comorbidities, we think of EoE plus minus GERD and esophageal motility disorders as well.

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
Correct. Again, I'm going to flip the argument again. By that I mean, how am I supposed to manage the child who has an oropharyngeal swallowing issue? Having taken care of oral problems, put them on the right track with the right professionals, speech and language pathologists, dietitians, and inquired to the best of my ability on esophageal problems. If I am dealing, and I know that I'm dealing primarily with an oropharyngeal problem, then a FEES or a modified barium swallow or a combination will identify for me the pattern of the swallowing problem. I know that we have the homing on whether it's penetration or aspiration.

For some purists, it's the penetration or aspiration scale. The brilliant idea that was proposed, if memory serves me, from Seattle, about the physiological cleft. There are children during FEES who can show premature spill only, who can show residues after a pharyngeal squeeze and swallow. There are others who may show penetration or aspiration from all borders of the larynx, be it an epiglottic undercoating or a spill-over aryepiglottic folds, or actually the posterior penetration or aspiration again, question mark, silent versus non-silent.

I think that the augmentation procedure, being an injection or a repair, should be directed at those primarily who have a posterior penetration or aspiration at the discretion of the surgeon. It depends on your aims, on your achievable aims. We don't always, in a child with cerebral palsy or a hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, achieve full oral FEES with surgery because it's too multifactorial. It makes sense to have an appreciation that you want to advance the FEES, you want to come close as possible to oral feeding. Even if it stays for some enjoyment, some degree of rehabilitation, a gradual one can actually flow.

Generally speaking, I think that most children, you will reach a ceiling with them by age around the age of two, and then if there is anything else that will come later, it really is a guess that is 50-50. You can't really tell which direction is it going to go through. I generally like to tell the parents that one of the main objectives is to protect their lungs, particularly in the first two years of life, so that we don't have a respiratory cripple.

(3) Physical Exam Strategies to Assess Laryngeal Cleft

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Just going back to physical exam, is there anything that you've noticed that some of these cleft babies-- Or when your consult your initial evaluation is for feeding difficulties, are there specific physical findings? Or what do you go through on your physical exam usually?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
A general exam is a good idea, and I think pediatric otolaryngologists need to always understand that they are dealing with children who need some form of developmental assessment, and their communication, their general demeanor tells them a lot. A child who is not feeding properly is a child that is not generally very happy, not very relaxed. Subtle dysmorphic features are pretty important. You may be dealing with a syndromic child. You're not going to diagnose the syndrome quite often, but you can tell if the child has some dysmorphic features related to your area.

The other feature is testing for tone, because if the child has a low tone in the end, you can expect a few problems. The second issue is after you ensure that you have an oral cavity that is within average, that you have gone through the nose and you expected patency before you leave the nose you should, I feel that whereas the young child, you cannot always tell a submucous cleft trans-orally you can actually tell that the child has a submucous cleft with a telescope a lot better. Because you're going to see the nasal septum rather than inserting itself at right angle onto the floor of the nose, it will be flying in the breeze and creating a bit of an acute angle. You will see that at the nasal side of the soft palate.

FEES to me is the queen. Not biased towards the kings and males. The queen of all examinations. You really need to see whether you have an open and patent velopharynx or not, and competent one. Sometimes, the first thing that is secretions inside the nose, saliva as a matter of fact forming, not discharge. Certainly if a little bit of in fact secretions in the nose especially in an infant, this is not a usual finding. This is telling you that there might be some nasopharyngeal escape. Then when you look at the larynx, in an infant in particular, we all know that the larynx is a bit high and the epiglottis usually gives you the high five.

Definitely before you even notice the base of tongue, you should see the epiglottis. If the epiglottis being hugged by the tongue base and the tongue base is slightly higher, your odds of finding an anterior larynx is pretty high. That particular risk factor, if you ask about risk factors, that is almost, in my opinion, a slam dunk. You're going to find a problem that needs a bit of rehabilitation there. The way the larynx and the hypopharynx handles salivary secretions is very important. There are no benchmark classifications. There is one from the adult world, purely subjective as any other endoscopy, and then you need to draw on your experience in laryngology.

The FEESer needs to be really an accomplished laryngologist. The child is not always incredibly happy, although we have advanced. Initially, we never tried with toddlers, but now, we do it with them and we have our own ways of entertaining them and convincing them diplomatically that we're doing well and we mean well. You determine whether you have malacia or not, you determine whether you have a movement disorder or not. I use that word in particular rather than talking about paralysis. Then you start your show with the feed, which the child really needs to play ball with it, and some of them definitely will say, "Not today. Don't try."

I do not forget to auscultate. That's something that we forget as an art. It tells us a few things. Certainly tells us whether the lower airway is affected or not, it tells us whether it's purely upper airway, not purely of course, but it definitely does help. A good proportion of my patients also were dysphonic, and that's the other thing, that the parents will quite often tell you, upon asking, "The child's voice is weak."

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
You said you look at mobility, in terms of vocal cord mobility, do you ever see sluggishness or mobility or dysfunction in mobility?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
There is a good number, and it's a research and a practice interest of mine. I think, in short, people have not documented very well non-paralytic mobility disorders, like arytenoid dislocations and fixations. You more often will encounter fixations with stenotic lesions, acquired stenotic lesions, and you will need definitely to examine them under anesthesia. By extension, I feel that the literature skips that step, and in my controversial publication about the natural history of bilateral idiopathic paralysis, when I did my systematic review, I said all but one skipped an examination under anesthesia.

If you go through your board exam or your fellowship exam, and you see a flexible scope view and the larynx is not moving, and you say the larynx is paralyzed, the examiner is bound to give you a note for your answer, but in the world of research, they say, "Dr. Hakeem said that it was paralyzed, so it's paralyzed." That really doesn't work because that distorts our information about the natural history and epidemiology.

The next thing is that arytenoid dislocations are often in cardiac patients, particularly in children who have an anterior larynx, and sometimes when you go under the wraps and you are re-intubating a child whom you have done a cricoid split and grafts and people are under the tent of the drapes and they could quite easily knock off a small larynx going in and intubating the child who basically has an open airway and a split larynx.

The last one is that, and that's my up-and-coming work is on laryngeal dyskinesia. Some people conflate the diagnosis of paralysis and palsy and dyskinesia, and there are very few large series that include the word dyskinesia. In my series, the word dyskinesia, based on EMG and based on physical and clinical exam, is documented as many times as bilateral paralysis, which changes the natural history. These are quite often associated with swallowing abnormalities as well.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
That's very interesting. Just going back to you said FEES is your queen, is there a role for the video swallow or OPMS in your practice or when do you consider getting the video swallow in addition to, or in place of, the FEES?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
The modified barium swallow is the benchmark whether we like it or not. Historically, this is the beginning, this is where authorities relate to. Many argue that this is a natural position of the child to feed, although it depends on the culture. For example, our indigenous population don't usually feed their children, or so I am told by the speech and language pathologist, in a high chair, and that can sometimes create a little bit of an unnatural situation for them. The second thing is that the modified barium swallow, as we all know, is a lateral view x-ray, so it does not show me a panoramic view of the larynx.

The examiner and the radiologist will go through a series or multiple sequences, and they will pick the relevant views that have even a proof of normality or abnormality. There is the degree of radiation. Do I always get a successful functional endoscopic evaluation of swallowing? Certainly not, but with experience, we basically do close to 90 a year, each arm of this clinic, so we probably go well over 150 a year, so we have very good experience with it. It's attractive always in infants where the risk of carcinogenesis from radiation is pretty high.

To start with the FEES, you have information that is unachievable, at least in terms of the laryngeal mobility, its structure, its handling of secretions. The subtlety of handling secretions does not appear on the modified barium swallow as clearly as the FEES. We combine them. I don't really see it as a competition between the two modalities in any way. It depends on the child, and it depends also on the baseline of the child. If I take a decision of management based on a modified barium swallow, it's ideal if I repeat the same study after treatment.

These are really, generally speaking, the odds and the factors. Again, practices vary. Sometimes, the preference of the parents vary. Parents are sometimes quite averse to the risks of radiation, and in the same instance, some others might not imagine how the FEES could go, although in my own experience, they basically sit and say, "Is that it?" I say, "Yes, that's it."

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Let's say we have the one-year-old that you're seeing. The child is rattly, she's gurgly, let's say she had a history of a pneumonia at five months and has had an ED visit at two months and then another ED visit at eight months, both of the ED visits for troubled breathing. Let's say you evaluate her and you do the FEES, and you might see a little premature spillage. At that point, do you start thinking, "Okay, let me--" When do you start planning for a DLB? When your suspicion is high for a laryngeal cleft, do you talk to the family about that diagnosis, or do you wait for your DLB and see what your findings are? Tell me about what the next steps would be for that patient.

(4) The Role of DLB in Assessing Laryngeal Cleft

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
Of course, I have to talk a little bit about the tiers of our assessment because in most United States aerodigestive programs, it's a one complete examination by all the relevant specialists, GI, respirology, ENT, and speech and language pathology, and maybe others. We have two tiers because the vast majority of our children can actually be assessed comprehensively and managed between the otolaryngologist and the speech and language pathologist. That's what we call our aspiration clinic.

The second tier that may be required are the children who may have established lung diagnosis, for lack of a better word, or high suspicion of GI, complex patients, in particular those who have tracheostomies or are graduates from our tracheostomy clinic after establishing a good airway and a patent one and getting decannulated. Also, the patients from our tracheal program, in which I and the cardiovascular surgeon, Dr. Mohammed Al Aklabi, have established in Edmonton, we manage the tracheal stenosis and related lesions. In addition to that, the tracheoesophageal fistula patients. We find that the monthly clinics of the aerodigestive program are a bit more complicated.

Patients, those who stumble from the aspiration clinic, or we feel have an issue by one of the members that the rest of them really should see it. In terms of our approach, it's probably classical. The clinical evaluation takes place at the speech and language pathology office, partly over the phone, partly in person. Rule of thumb for everybody, especially that those clinics are going to be always in a tertiary, quaternary level. These are high-risk patients. You don't go in and send them an invite in order to come and visit you. They have symptoms or they have conditions that put the patient at risk.

Clinical examination, on its own, is never enough, and that is an established benchmark of practice. Then we meet together in the aspiration clinic, no less than half an hour consultation, going through a standard set of questions and elimination of risk factors, inquiry about cardiac, respiratory, developmental, the rest of it. If we can get away after the FEES by introducing a thickened diet, a modified diet, or some advice in terms of pacing and so forth, then that's good, we're going to re-evaluate back again and see how does the child do.

That includes preliminary assessment and treatment sometimes of gastric esophageal reflux disease, bearing in mind that our glorious PPIs are now uncovering their ugly face in terms of side effects and so forth. The next step, I never really stage endoscopy and surgery. If I am failing with conservative or medical treatment, I will go and scope. I will never delay an endoscopy if the child has already dangerous symptoms like blue spells or apparent life-threatening episodes, or they failed within a short period of time if you were getting recurrent pneumonias and chest infections, or if they have an alternate route of feeding.

Because one of the main objectives of any clinic or any program is to reduce and shorten as much as possible the period of non-oral feeding. Then I will go and tell the parents, depending on my findings, "Look, I've seen a mobility disorder, I'll see what I can do on the day, of reasons." Or, "I am suspecting that we have a posterior problem over here, and I need to augment that area." I give them an overall view of the two main methods, whether it's a surgical repair or an injection. I quite often will say, "There is a possibility of a GI specialist coming in the same time."

I quite often will take bronchoalveolar lavage as well in the same time. The jury are out in terms of the utility of the yield, whether you really depend on the identification of lipid-laden macrophages or not, whether you have a child who has oropharyngeal flora and way more than contamination in the lower airway. Trust me, the interpretation of this in the literature and experience is at least heterogeneous. At the end of the day, I try and limit trips. I try and combine the endoscopic examination. I will do the airway examination to start with first with agreement with the respirologist. In follow-ups, should the child have adequate examination and treatment by otolaryngology and the remainder is a substantial plan for respriology, then they go and do subsequent lower airway examination. That, in my opinion, is more economical in terms of time, effort, and grouping of people together.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Yes, every once in a while I'll have a young newborn that's admitted within the first three to six weeks of life with, a blue spell. They get admitted. It's noted that they're having feeding difficulties. They see speech and have a feeding evaluation and, there's a concern for aspiration. We get consulted on the inpatient side and then NICU usually. If we're not making progress, we don't have a good feeding plan, then we end up doing these DLB evaluations while they're inpatient. At that time, do you usually also go ahead and talk to your GI colleagues if you are planning a DLB? It makes sense to me on the outpatient side, with a structured aspiration and feeding clinic because that partnership and that system is set up for it. Every once in a while, the consult is outside of that system.

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
No, it makes sense. Most definitely. Particularly the age range that you're talking about, Gopi, is tricky because you don't have enough history to tell whether the child has esophageal problems. There are some that will do. I remember a CMV-infected child, congenital CMV child, who basically had raging reflux and that was one of the very few slam-dunk situations where a fundo has made a world of difference without any problem. That is the other factor that you occasionally may see on a VFSS. You don't see an oropharyngeal abnormality, meaning aspiration from above, but an aspiration from below with regurgitation of the bolus and entry in the airway.

Again, that age group is really very tricky and it's not impossible, obviously, to find clefts particularly, but a stridorous patient in the first few weeks of life is usually a mobility disorder, in my own opinion, until proven otherwise, unless you're lucky enough to find your annual two or three tracheal stenosis patients. Again, I am very careful when I talk about laryngomalacia. I haven't uttered laryngomalacia many times here because I think that laryngomalacia is an entity that needs further epidemiological and clinical description.

I dished out 90 videos for four surgeons that are experienced, fellowship trained, and I told them, classify the laryngomalacia that you see. I inserted 20 videos that were totally normal. The agreement was abysmal. It just shows us that-- and it's not really, it's no disrespect. As a matter of fact, what we're talking about here in most of the topic is endoscopic evaluation. Endoscopic evaluation is subject to interrater and interobserver variability, where a lot of science has proven that even biological factors will impede the agreement between the best of people. That's one of our main barriers talking about swallowing over here.

(5) Performing DLB in Children with Laryngeal Cleft

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Yes, that's true. The interrater variability on laryngoscopies, something as we think as simple as vocal cord immobility can be really difficult, and you can record it and show it to three different people, especially if it's conserved for bilateral, and you will get three different answers oftentimes, and it can be really tricky. Okay, so let's say we are in the operating room. How do you do your DLBs? Do you have tricks for your setup and for suspension? How do you like to evaluate for a laryngeal cleft?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
In terms of the tricks, I definitely ask in most situations for a flexible endoscopy, unless I have done a nice well-documented FEES, and I do not have any suspicion about a laryngeal mobility problem. It's pretty important in children who snore. The suspension itself, I think it's a classic one, but I insist to sometimes even the miffing of my fellow anesthetist on having the first look and putting the local myself because I want to see how much secretions are there, because after a child has been fasting for six hours, you should go and see nice glistening mucosa, but no pulling of secretions there.

I generally will suspend them. The most difficult suspensions are those who are younger than six weeks. Those guys will need your Parsons, and the Parsons is notoriously wobbly, so I use a set of tricks with tape here and there, and that stabilizes the patient nicely for me so that I can look and be sure that I'm a happy man and I have a nice panoramic view. The tape essentially is to create a cricoid pressure. On one side, usually the opposite side to the anesthetic circuit in order to stop the traction that comes from it, and another one on the suspension mechanism, which is usually twinned with the Parsons. That's the little disc rather than the flared one. These are the secrets of my grandfather.

The other one that should not be escaped is the overview of the larynx. If you really have less than a grade one, always document it because that might explain something for you. It might explain why your child might have a problem. 50% of my series of anterior larynx, very different, very different from a robot. That is one kettle of fish and that's another beast altogether. That may prevent you from doing a laryngeal cleft repair.

Another trick about it may appear in the awake child as a type I laryngomalacia with posterior prolapse, and once you sedate them, I look with the flexible scope, you're not going to see it. When you suspend them, you certainly don't see the features of the laryngomalacia. If you insist on doing a supraglottoplasty, this will be heralding two or three days of tough time for you and for the baby because they don't heal very well and they are very unforgiving.

Generally speaking, the remainder is dependent on our right-angled probe. If you go to the literature, which I have looked at, there are many clever people who have published on how to examine the child, and maybe even Dr. Richard Smith has created the special instrument for measuring the laryngeal cleft. The variation of three millimeters between one child and another across a huge age range does not lend itself to measurements that can actually be reproducible, in my opinion.

It's incredibly clever, no doubt about that. I think some of my fellows and my residents looked at me and said, where is this cleft that Hamdy is seeing? That guy is imagining things. That's why I tend more to document what I could see. If I have the posterior aspiration in the clinic during the feast, then I go ahead with a repair or another augmentation procedure.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Just going back, you said you always have a flex scope, especially for your snorers. Do you DISE all these babies then?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
Yes. Yes. As usual, it's a fixed drill, no inhalation, no anesthesia, total intravenous agents and I think again my fellow anesthetists here at the Stollery at some point thought that this is going to be another era of 30 years of difficulty with this madman but now we're they're quite adept at it and it takes less than five minutes.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Is the vocal cord spreader ever helpful to you when you're looking for these?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
The vocal cord?

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Spreader. Does that ever help you widen the gap and help you check depth I'll be honest I do not use that routinely in my practice to check for a cleft but sometimes I'm curious am I not evaluating enough? Is there any benefit to that? Most of the time I don't use it.

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
I don't think so. I don't use it for the evaluation this is really just mainly for access of lesions and clefts below the level of the cord and depending on the age of the child the spreader can actually be a space-occupying lesion in its own right and a hindrance to bimanual work.

(6) Strategies for Laryngeal Cleft Repair

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Usually these babies you said, I try to minimize taking them to the OR on multiple trips. I would imagine that if your suspicion is high enough especially based on your face evaluation the history your assessment in clinic, you've can prepare the family that if you do detect a laryngeal cleft that you will go ahead and repair or augment it at that setting. Yes, okay.

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
Sure.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
How do you decide when you're going to do a formal repair or when you're going to do an augmentation? For augmentation, I think I always think of the gel injection augmentation. Is that what you use as well?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
I have started certainly with injections and the real reason is that historically we were all skeptical about the role of the laryngeal cleft type one or the deep inter-arytenoid notch in the whole process. Material has evolved I used once gel foam and I discovered soon that it's close to a waste of time because it oozes out and it doesn't really get retained in the tissue for too long. Then I started to use hyaluronic acid essentially availability and this was available because the urologists use it. It's smooth, it's quick, it's present.

Its history of biocompatibility is there but I soon discovered that 1 in 10 of those children will have croup-like symptoms afterwards and they may have it for along with strident for a good few days. Two or three are memorable, one of them ended up with a seroma. When I looked into the literature, I usually say to myself these materials have been used or that suture have been used or that instrument have been used in other specialties let's see what others have found and you can see in the cosmetic literature how hyaluronic acid can because seromas and reactions in tissues facial tissues and other places where they where it gets used.

Now my colleagues who use other materials including hydroxyapatite say that they do not encounter that problem. The advantage remains in terms of speed and simplicity but the problem of injection is that it's imprecise. You don't know exactly where and how much. It's not like a pocket of space that will retain it and you pump it up. It's not like your car tire, it can go in different areas. 1 in 10 problems that I just mentioned the evolution of any single surgeon and evolution of the specialty I think have impacted our approach and our attitude towards repair.

Repair in the olden times was done in the absence of enough choice of intravenous agents of anesthesia so people used inhalational anesthesia or situations or conditions where there is no spontaneous respiration and that lengthened the procedure. The instruments were definitely less precise at the time. Many of those children ended up in intensive care and intubated. We all forget that the end of the '80s and the '90s have seen the introduction of intravenous agents and flexible and even rigid scopes that are way more precise than that.

The next hurdle is really about technique and I was not really-- I was properly trained in six children's hospitals but we didn't do repairs over there at the time and the interest in swallowing had not caught up so I self-taught and I learned about ergonomics. I learned about which suture is going to be easier for me to use slippery versus non-slippery wetting my instruments wetting, the larynx that's going to dry up during your procedure. My first one took about maybe a couple of hours until I took two or three sutures, now, it's 20 minutes and 70% of my children go home on the same day, and zero end up intubated unless obviously, we're talking about a larger cleft or a deeper cleft.

I tell the parents, look, if I inject you're going to come back again and across the board, it's 50 to 60% response rate, 50% of them temporary and the rest permanent, whereas, all the evidence is coming confirming somewhere between 75 to 85% good success with repairs. Do some of them break? 100% but we don't know how many we don't know, which technique.

Cincinnati has produced a first article demonstrating that laser techniques are less favorable and a good difference. The breakdown however of the repairs and the resolution of the injections have been a silver lining in my opinion because they have demonstrated to the skeptics with a practical and of one study or crossover study that they work because the symptoms relapse after an initial good response. That is quite a serendipitous indication that we are on the right track

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
In terms of sutures, what sutures do you like to use and then in terms of ergonomics what have you found to be helpful in terms of whether it's bed height, the chair, how you sit?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
So I use the PDS and generally speaking in the typical age, I use a 7-0 the ergonomics really go back to even and that's probably a reflection of age and time at work in general. I pay attention such that I go back to my years when I learned microsurgery you always have to sit with all your joints at right angle pretty comfortable elbow support. I wrap around the head and the telescope and the laryngoscope a simple white sheet so that I can see the suture and it doesn't mix up with the hair of the patient I could see it easily.

I remind the surgeon in training that there are there they're going to be working at two focal lengths one under the microscope and the other one when they come outside and they have to do their throws and you have to have somebody who's holding one end of the suture while you're using the pusher to go down on the all the way down the 40-centimeter focal length so these are some and as I mentioned I find that with the duration of the procedure.

Even just for 10 minutes, you find that the larynx dries up from the intensity of the light so I wet it quite often with saline. All my instruments are wet and all my sutures are wet. I inject a little bit of obviously lignocaine with adrenaline on that site and I just more no more than 0.2 CCs. All of these little things make a difference. The hold of the suture of the needle itself should not be classical at right angle, especially in the first suture. You actually hold it like a harpoon, and you reverse it as a reverse harpoon, as I call it. These are all the products of trial and error and a little bit of thinking.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Then for your technique, do you use laser to open the mucosa, or do you use a cold technique?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
It's purely cold technique.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
With laryngeal scissors, or how do you open up the mucosa?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
I try to start with the sickle knife, but with one hand exerting traction posteriorly, and usually the left-curving scissors, I incise the mucosa in between the arytenoids, and then I go slightly on the mound of the arytenoid without going into the cartilage, and I take four sutures nearly every time.

(7) Post-Operative Management of Laryngeal Cleft Repair

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Then what is part of your postoperative management? Are these patients on PPIs? Do you send them home with a steroid taper, or a modified diet, or anything like that?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
The diet depends on the result of the FEES, and it doesn't get changed immediately. Postoperatively, if they are on PPIs, they will continue on PPIs. I make sure that if the child has had pneumonias and wheezing, that they basically have been, let's call it, cleaned enough. Some bronchodilators and inhaled steroids are given beforehand, and they continue afterwards, and that varies, that gets individualized.

If they have not been on PPIs before, I only give them two weeks' worth of it. This is a tiny wound at the end of the day. your tonsillectomy heals completely after two weeks. That will probably heal in a handful of days. I don't really give a whole host of instructions to the parents. What is what you get in the immediate postoperative period? I never really repeat the assessment before eight to ten weeks. I used to try and be over-optimistic, and I think most surgeons actually have confirmed that. At 8 to 10 weeks, they come back and see you. What happens in your clinic? How do you assess them? What's a good outcome? What outcomes are you looking at? What's your metrics?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
Good question. I tell the guys in training that I am autistic about how I assess and how I do it back again. I have a drill of questions. It's a smart phrase that I put in our electronic medical record system, and there is an equivalent ask for all when they come back, in addition to asking whether they had problems afterwards, including pain, readmission, and so forth.

We basically go and say, okay, how do you feel right now? If the child is still on a modified diet, then we really need to thin that during the examination and repeat the FEES or the modified period as well. If the child is on a non-modified diet, sometimes the parents would come and say the choking has gone down and so forth. I would caution, I always went along with, or initially, I went along with what the parents have seen, because at the end of the day, you don't treat a test, you treat the child.

I must admit that the resolution sometimes of the symptoms precedes the resolution of the instrumentals. One has to be skeptic also about the placebo effect. Parents are always hopeful that something is going to happen, child is going to be better. It also depends on the season. You might be doing it in the summer or the spring and the winter has gone, the number of infections are less. By the same token, they might have been ill because you've done it in the beginning of the fall and they have siblings and they've had a few colds and there is an interpretation that it's a doom and gloom.

8 to 10 weeks, I'll say that, and again, I need to remeasure that, it's probably, a response related to your surgery directly within the first six months in most of your successful patients. You get rid of the thickening or you thin it even more, or you work towards a thinner consistency, water type of consistency. The question that you pose is also very important.

If I have a neurologically affected child, and I'm very precise about what's a neurologically affected child, because there are neurologically affected children that their neurologic problem doesn't have anything to do with dysphagia. There's no need for lumping that, but you want as much as possible an oral component to those children. You need to start working it so that the plasticity of the brain doesn't actually get lost in terms of swallowing function.

(8) Additional Challenges Associated with Severe Laryngeal Clefts

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Then as we're starting to round it out, and as we come to an end, I'm excited because we got to do a thorough conversation on type 1 laryngeal clefts. Can you tell us a little bit about nuances or considerations really for some of the more advanced laryngeal clefts, whether it's type 2 or 3?

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
I definitely will tell you that my experience doesn't encompass many of those.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Thank God that most of us may not see this, but every few years, hopefully, if ever, yes.

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
They usually will come with an additional problem. That additional problem will have something to do with the swallowing. I tell the parents, I can basically shut with a few procedures. I tell them always, it's going to be a few procedures because this cleft is telling you, I don't have enough tissue with nerve and blood supply over here. Otherwise, I wouldn't be a cleft. You need to go follow the classic instructions technically in terms of getting the apex, protecting the airway to the best of your ability.

There are people who will do the type 2 and 3 without a tracheostomy. I certainly have done tracheostomy in both type 2s or the 3 type 2s that I have done before. I did it transiently and it made life a lot easier during the procedure. I sleep well and the patient sleeps well. It may delay the decannulation to some extent. Again, they're apples and oranges. 3s are going to be a battle.

The pearls that I have heard from Dr. Mike Rutter and Dr. Reza Rahbar have always been, you're going to be friends with these patients for a long time. Whereas you're talking to a type 1 and a type 2 about normalization and progression of swallowing and preservation of that skill, you're talking to 3s and 4s about preservation of life, which is a very different primary objective. The remainder is a very long hole and you need to drill it again and again. It's one of those that we classify as difficult conversations.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Thank you so much, Hamdy. I learned a ton. As we wrap it up, any final pearls that you want to leave our listeners with?

(9) Caring for Families Affected by Laryngeal Cleft

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
I think the piece is that my experience with how the parents feel like, those are not trivial problems. The lack of knowledge in the community, the lay community, and ours is a first battle for all of us. We did a project with a master's student, the involvement of a master's student, and we put together a parent's reported outcome questionnaire for otherwise healthy children so that we can screen or alternatively, on occasions, do without some of the instrumentals with their costly and time-consuming nature.

Part of that was a qualitative assessment. Our first 67 parents came out with a phenomenal point. We were basically ignored, or we were accused of seeing things. We were told it's partly in your head or at least, if not, wholly in your head. Two of them had suicidal ideation and I was quite privileged to get interviewed by a BBC food program, actually had a little bit of my instigation because they talked about dysphagia in adults and I wanted them to talk about dysphagia in children.

A patient who was managed and being managed as we speak in Britain, his mother corroborated this. She said, I was told, you need to see somebody for your mental health. This child has no problem. This child continues to have an alternate route of feeding up till this time. Only just over a year ago that this child have even a G-tube. Most of the life of this child has been spent with a nasogastric tube, with what you can imagine in terms of the difficulties.

This is a basic function. It's one of the most promising that our specialty will tackle along with others. This is a fantastic example of people working together and seeing the fruit of their work. It is so appreciated by the parents. You have no idea. It may sound to start with like, an airy-fairy situation and it's healthy always to approach it with a degree of skepticism, but the impact is profound.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Thank you so much, Hamdy. If any of our listeners have any questions for you, are you on any social media? If not, they can reach out to us through BackTable and we can relay the message as well.

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
Absolutely. I'm on Twitter, otherwise known now as the X, and more than happy to answer questions through yourself or through my email at the University of Alberta as well.

[Dr. Gopi Shah]
Awesome. Thank you so much. I learned a ton. I think it's a wrap.

[Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim]
Thank you. Thank you so much, Gopi. It's been an honor.

Podcast Contributors

Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim discusses Navigating Type I Laryngeal Clefts in Children on the BackTable 169 Podcast

Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim

Dr. Hamdy El-Hakim is the director of pediatric otolaryngology fellowship at the University of Alberta in Canada.

Dr. Gopi Shah discusses Navigating Type I Laryngeal Clefts in Children on the BackTable 169 Podcast

Dr. Gopi Shah

Dr. Gopi Shah is a pediatric otolaryngologist and the co-host of BackTable ENT.

Cite This Podcast

BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2024, April 30). Ep. 169 – Navigating Type I Laryngeal Clefts in Children [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com

Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.

Up Next

Financial Literacy in ENT: Diversifying Your Learnings & Earnings with Dr. Robert Puchalski on the BackTable ENT Podcast)
Tinnitus & Migraine: Expert Insight with Dr. Hamid Djalilian on the BackTable ENT Podcast)
Revolutionizing ENT with Artificial Intelligence with Dr. Mas Takashima on the BackTable ENT Podcast)
Safeguarding Physician Wellbeing: Julie Wei’s Journey with Dr. Julie Wei on the BackTable ENT Podcast)
AI in Laryngology: Enhancing Patient Diagnosis with Dr. Anthony Law on the BackTable ENT Podcast)
Balloon Sinuplasty: Evolution, Efficacy & Expert Insights with Dr. Ayesha Khalid on the BackTable ENT Podcast)

Articles

Laryngeal Cleft: The Basics

Laryngeal Cleft: The Basics

Type 1 Laryngeal Cleft Repair

Type 1 Laryngeal Cleft Repair

Topics

Learn about Laryngology on BackTable ENT
Learn about Pediatric ENT on BackTable ENT
bottom of page