BackTable / OBGYN / Article
Climate Change: a Women’s Health Issue
Melissa Malena • Updated Oct 2, 2024 • 37 hits
Climate change is a complex and hotly debated topic that not only affects our environment but public health as well. Many of us have come to understand that our sea levels are rising, our seasons are generally getting warmer, and extreme weather seems to be more common now than in years prior. But are you aware of the direct effects of climate change on women’s health and reproductive outcomes?
Dr. Jane Van Dis and Dr. Alexandra Melnyk, co-founders of OBGYNs for a Sustainable Future, explain the tangible impacts of climate change on public health and how the climate crisis uniquely affects the health of women worldwide. This article features excerpts from the BackTable OBGYN Podcast. We’ve provided the highlight reel in this article, but you can listen to the full podcast below.
The BackTable OBGYN Brief
• Sea temperatures have increased by 1.78 degrees Celsius and are projected to cross the 2-degree marker by 2030. The extreme weather phenomena associated with this rise in temperature have led to an increase in the number of climate refugees from previously habitable areas.
• Increased atmospheric temperatures allow for tropical diseases, such as malaria, to expand geographically, which proves especially dangerous for pregnant women. Increased temperatures are also associated with an increase in preterm births, stillbirths, and low birth weights.
• Heat and hotter temperatures have been shown to negatively impact both male and female fertility.
• Microplastic and nanoplastic pollution is associated with early onset puberty, endocrine dysfunction, and congenital abnormalities.
Table of Contents
(1) Climate Change: What Does It Mean?
(2) The Effects of Climate Change on Women’s Health & Reproductive Outcomes
(3) The Effects of Microplastics on Women’s Health
Climate Change: What Does It Mean?
Climate change remains a hot topic at the forefront of popular conversation, but it can be difficult to ascertain the practical implications of the climate crisis. The world’s large bodies of water have absorbed most of the produced carbon emissions since the Industrial Revolution and as a result, the sea temperature has continued to rise.
According to Dr. Van Dis, a key figure to understanding the climate crisis is the six standard deviation marker, which means that the seas are six standard deviations from the mean hotter than they should be. Previously, the scientific community emphasized the importance of trying to stay below a 1.5 degrees Celsius temperature increase. However, the current sea temperature has increased by 1.78 degrees Celsius and is estimated to surpass 2 degrees Celsius by 2030.
This increase in temperature will be associated with a significant loss of sea ice and sea level rise. These changes in sea levels and temperatures can be tied to extreme weather events across the world, which make previously settled areas inhabitable for humans and increase the number of climate refugees.
[Dr. Amy Park]
I think that this topic and on all your efforts in this sphere is more timely than ever. Last year, 2023 was one of the hottest, I think the hottest year on record and it just felt like there was crisis after crisis; heat, rain, flooding, all the things. Can you tell us what's happening today in terms of climate change? What's going on?
[Dr. Jane Van Dis]
I can kind of speak to that. I follow these scientists every day. I'm somewhat addicted to the conversations that are going on. The really hard part for people to understand and I actually gave Grand Rounds on Friday at Southview down on Long Island, the Department of OBGYN there. I've said if there was a way that I could make every American understand what Six standard deviations from the mean means because that's how far off of normal our seas are right now.
As most people know, the seas have absorbed the majority of our carbon emissions since the Industrial Revolution. I read Bill McKibben, I think it was back in 2018, that our land surface temperature, if the seas had not absorbed all of that excess CO2 and methane, would be 97°F hotter on land. Obviously, completely uninhabitable for almost all forms of life.
The idea is then that all of that energy has now gone into the oceans, which obviously comprise the majority of the surface area of the earth. Having said that, the oceans are sort of, I feel like the oceans are now talking back. Because for them to be Six standard deviations from the mean hotter than they normally would be means I think that we're in for a lot of rapid change.
Now there's a lot of debate going on as to whether or not we're in an accelerated period, which is to say we're not going in a linear fashion as the models had predicted that there's an aberration and an acceleration of heating and change. You'll see the climate scientists debate that, but I've actually read a couple of papers now that seem pretty convincing that we are in an accelerated phase.
What that means is that all the models are a little bit off. For instance, when we saw the COP and we saw people talking about 1.5°C as, like, "Hey, we better not cross that." Well, we crossed it in 2023. I believe we're at 1.78°C above normal, above pre-industrial 1850 means.
I guess I feel like I still see in print a lot that people say, "Well, if we can stay under 1.5," and it's like, "Well, people, I'm not sure that we're ever going to see 1.5 again." We are in an El Nino and so that has affected a lot of the heat and a lot of the aberrations that we're seeing.
Having said that, some of the scientists are saying we're past 1.5 and we are going to pass 2 by 2030. That's a very different world than the one we're living in now because at 2°C, that's when we start to see some of the tipping points kick in where we have accelerated loss of sea ice, so accelerated sea level rise.
Right now, you hear people talk about sea level rise and they'll be like, "Oh, it's just a couple of centimeters a year," but if you talk to the people in Portland, Maine over the weekend, where there was 14 feet above the normal sea level due to the high tide plus the storm, they're absolutely saying that this is a new normal.
Amy, I can't actually answer your question because the fact is that we've left the Goldilocks Zone. We've left the zone that humans have evolved in over the last tens of thousands of years. We are in a new normal and we should expect that we are going to see continued aberrations like the one that we saw this week. Where the weakness of the polar vortex has allowed arctic air to go down to Dallas so that they had, it was 14 degrees in Dallas yesterday, so that's a new normal.
These atmospheric rivers and these hurricanes that sort of circle and stay in the same place like Hurricane Harvey did. Every single possible weather event I feel like is seen at a greater degree, a greater proportion. The proportionality has absolutely changed. We'll see. Like I said, it's a new normal and we're never going back.
[Dr. Amy Park]
I know it's interesting because you alluded to two things earlier in your intro that I think about all the time is my older son was also born in 2008. There's a lot of youth these days who do not want to have children because they don't want to bring their children into the environmental impact of having kids, bringing them into this environment. It's definitely become more of a thing. The other thing I was thinking of is I just remember Equilibrium Magazine had this article from, I think it was like sometime in the spring or summer of last year and it was like, "Is climate safe for climate refugees like yourself?"
Yes. To your point, a Great Lakes town and inland and, yes, of course, we have some pretty extreme weather, but not as extreme and dangerous as the wildfires, especially as in California.
[Dr. Alexandra Melnyk]
You have water and that's going to be a resource that's going to be in high, high demand. The New York Times has done some incredible reporting on the nation's aquifers and what a dangerous state that they are in. Actually, what's so fascinating is the satellites are taking photographs using magnetic imaging to determine how much water is in US aquifers. To me, that technology obviously is just so fascinating that you could take a picture from the sky and see underneath the rock and the earth. The fact of the matter is that there are places, like Arizona, like the Southwest, that are looking at a future where water will be the most valuable resource.
Listen to the Full Podcast
Stay Up To Date
Follow:
Subscribe:
Sign Up:
The Effects of Climate Change on Women’s Health & Reproductive Outcomes
Climate change has a distinct impact on women’s health and reproductive outcomes. Women who live in hotter climates are more likely to experience preterm births, low birth weights, and stillbirths. It is also known that heat negatively impacts both male and female fertility.
Raised temperatures are also associated with an increase in the incidence and geographical scope of infectious diseases such as malaria and Lyme disease. Pregnant women are at an increased risk of malaria, as mosquitoes exhibit a preference to bite pregnant women over non-pregnant people. This preference is thought to be due to pregnant women’s increased basal metabolic temperature.
[Dr. Amy Park]
How does climate change impact health? Specifically, women's health and reproductive outcomes?
[Dr. Jane Van Dis]
Yes. I'll take that and then maybe Allie wants to do the women's health, I'll do the maternal. It's absolutely profound, the manners by which the climate crisis is impacting reproductive health. I'll start with heat. As you might guess, women who live in areas that are hotter, where, for instance, even a wet bulb temperature is higher, we saw this in data coming out of Pakistan, they're more likely to experience preterm births, low birth weight, and even stillbirths. Then heat also affects fertility rates as well. We know that heat affects both the female reproductive system and the male reproductive system.
Interestingly enough on OBGYNs for Sustainable Future, obg4sf.org, we had Blair Wylie from Columbia University and she was talking with us about the fact that mosquitoes are more attracted to pregnant women. They off-gas more CO2 and they have a higher basal metabolic temperature. If you were to put a bunch of people in a room with mosquitoes, the mosquitoes would be more attracted to, they're more likely to bite a pregnant woman.
As we're seeing, especially in the US Southeast, we're seeing more rates of malaria, which was a disease that really didn't come to the US shores very often, especially not where the person contacted it in the US. Then, dengue, too. Dengue is moving northward as well. Then the problem we see, too, is that as the winters get less cold, obviously, our recent cold stuff notwithstanding, the tick seasons are longer, and so, increased risk for Lyme disease as well.
These infectious diseases do put pregnant women at increased risk. There was a great study in the AJOG, in the Gray Journal, that looked at how women who were pregnant during Hurricane Harvey, what their pregnancy outcomes were like. What they found was that since Houston, which is where they did the study, since Houston has 42% of all US petrochemicals are manufactured or refined in Houston, as that hurricane sat and caused leakage of some of these chemicals into the water tables.
Those petrochemicals then had effects on those women's pregnancies in a linear fashion such that the closer she lived while she was pregnant to a petrochemical manufacturing site, the more likely she was to have water that was contaminated. Then the more likely she was likely to have increased morbidity for her pregnancy. I believe it went up 20%, 27%. Then for fetal outcomes, neonatal morbidity went up like close to 50% for those women who were in close proximity to that contaminated water.
Flooding impacts pregnant women. Then wildfires also increase the risk of preterm births and full birth weight. Same with fossil fuel air pollution. Really, what we're looking at are particles 2.5 micrometers or less. These are exacerbating people who have asthma, but they're also affecting these pregnancies in profound, profound ways.
In addition, studies showing that people who fight our fires have increased risks of miscarriage and infertility, so lots and lots of ways. I want to say, importantly, found studies showing that the closer you live to a major roadway, say, a freeway or highway, the increased risk for infertility. Say, if you're going through an IVF cycle. You will be less likely to conceive the closer you live to a roadway. Again, that's an air pollution correlation. So lots and lots of ways that these are external, I call them external impacts from fossil fuels and climate crises affecting the reproductive body. Maybe later we can talk in this podcast about how fossil fuels are getting into our body.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Oh, yes. I definitely want to talk about that. The other thing that I did want to bring up when you were talking was I was just thinking about these articles that I've been reading about how we talked about climate refugees and we're like, "Okay. LA to Rochester," but how about we're looking at the whole scale displacement of people from the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. Like there used to be very fertile areas and now, it's just a complete desert. People cannot survive. They are literally moving and cannot scrabble living together. It's crazy. It's displacing multiple populations, island nations, et cetera. Allie, did you want to say anything else about women's health in particular?
[Dr. Alexandra Melnyk]
I will, but you actually just brought up something that I wanted to touch a little bit more about. ACOG in 2016 put out a position statement on climate change and women's health. Then they restated it in 2020. They basically said that climate change is an urgent women's health concern and a major public health challenge. "We call on our national and international leaders to act to curb greenhouse gas emissions."
In this statement, they even said that the effects of climate change, food and water insecurity, civil conflicts, extreme weather events, all of these things that we've been talking about, spread of disease, for women in these affected regions at elevated risk of disease, malnutrition, sexual violence, poor mental health, lack of reproductive control, negative OB outcomes, and death.
While we're talking about this, we're talking about and having a conversation, but there's obviously a lot of literature on this subject and ACOG has recognized it as well. We're happy to talk about all this so that more people can hear and learn how bad things really are, I hate to say it that way.
To touch a little bit more on just women in general, overall, with extreme heat, women who are most vulnerable, or I should say adults who are most vulnerable are those greater than 65 years old and those with chronic illnesses, cardiopulmonary disease, and also very young children, especially under the age of five. We've been having more heat waves and these have been lasting longer.
Something that's interesting that I've learned in recent years is that in urban areas, this heat actually lasts for longer. It's called an urban heat island. The reason why is in cities where many of our listeners are listening to us, there's more asphalt, there's more surface area that's going to absorb the heat, and there's less greenery and less ability for the heat to get back into the atmosphere.
What happens is it's really hot during the day and then at night, it doesn't get cooler. That can persist for days and days. All of those people who are at higher risk and maybe, especially those in redline districts who maybe don't have air conditioning or maybe don't have access to a center where they can go to cool for several hours, things like that. They're going to be more at risk of having heat-related events because of that. We can expect to see more of this in the coming years because of these extreme heat waves. That's something I definitely wanted to touch upon.
The Effects of Microplastics on Women’s Health
It is no secret that the medical field relies heavily on single-use plastic products. While plastic production contributes to the climate crisis, microplastic pollution also negatively affects women’s health. According to the American Cancer Society, children are now born pre-polluted with polyvinyl chloride and PET as it crosses the placenta and possibly the blood-brain barrier. Nanoplastics, plastic particles small enough to cross all biological barriers, are linked to dementia, cancer, and autoimmune diseases. Phthalates, the nanoparticles that make plastic pliable, are particularly harmful to women’s health and are heavily present in medical products. According to Dr. Van Dis, phthalates are associated with endocrine-related infertility, early-onset puberty, and congenital anomalies.
[Dr. Jane Van Dis]
I feel like it really comes home when you realize that 12% of all global oil is made into plastic. Plastic, our society runs on it. There's so many things. Obviously, we as doctors use plastic all the time. Medical care wouldn't happen. How would we deliver blood? How would we draw a lab with a syringe? Everything around us in the medical field is plastic. Our society absolutely runs on it.
It is important to note that the fossil fuel producers recognized that plastic was a great place to continue to make investments and push technology back in the '70s. This is when obviously they knew the impacts that their product was going to have on human health. Their own researchers like Big Tobacco knew that we were in for a world of hurt.
Having said that, I wonder if you guys remember. I just had this core memory unlocked the other day when I remembered that there were times when we'd go to a vending machine and the soda was in a bottle, was in a glass. Now if you said that to a kid, they'd be like, "What?" Yes, you can see some sodas once in a while, some of the specialty sodas, especially in glass, but our whole society has pivoted to plastic.
What that has meant, unfortunately, is that plastic is now polluting our bodies such that the American Cancer Institute said our babies are being born pre-polluted. In my grand rounds, I have a slide dedicated to the fact that three studies came out in 2023, all of which showed that these placentas that had been tested were positive for microplastics.
Overwhelmingly, this was polyvinyl chloride and PET, the plastic that you see in the plastic water bottles. The plastics are crossing the placenta, but maybe they're crossing the blood-brain barrier as nanoplastics, too. Now we have studies showing that there is plastic basically in every organ in the body. When plastics cross into the brain, they are being linked to dementia. When plastics cross into other parts of the body, they're linked to cancers and autoimmune problems.
The problem is that the plastic water bottle that you drink out of has 10,000 other chemicals in it that haven't been approved by, say, the FDA or the EPA. There's a lot of exposure that we don't even know about. Then what happens, obviously, is that those plastics are breaking down. There was a study you guys probably saw published just this week showing that in one liter of water bottle, there were potentially 250,000 particles of nanoplastic.
Nanoplastic basically is small enough to cross every barrier in our body. It's interesting. I'm giving a talk at the library here in my town at the end of the month. I really want to have some more practical information, less academic. I just started this book about plastic. Interestingly enough, tonight I just finished the chapter on what the author terms petroplankton. This is plankton, which is a huge component of the ocean ecology and the ocean sea life. Plankton obviously are one of the backbones of all marine life.
Well, the plankton are uploading all this plastic into their bodies. He was talking about how he doesn't refer to them as plankton. He refers to them as petroplankton. The fact is that the phthalates are a key component of a lot of plastics. They make the plastics pliable. All of the catheter tubing, all the blood bags, all the gloves that we use in medicine, those all have phthalates in them.
Unfortunately, those phthalates have been associated with significant reproductive harm, and have been related to endocrine disruptions such as infertility, early puberty. There was a New York Times article this week saying, like, Why is the age of puberty, why does it keep getting lower and lower?" I'm like, "We know why. We know why. It's due to these phthalates. It's due to these plastics." It's affecting the birth weight of our babies. It's affecting whether our babies will be born with congenital anomalies.
They did a study showing the feces of a newborn versus the feces of a grown adult. The feces of the newborn had 20 times the concentration of plastics than the adult did. That's due to the body surface area to volume ratio of the infant compared to the adult. To be sure, the American Cancer Institute is right, our babies are being born pre-polluted.
Podcast Contributors
Dr. Alexandra Melnyk
Dr. Alexandra Melnyk is a urogyneologist with Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.
Dr. Jane van Dis
Dr. Jane van Dis is an assistant professor of obstetrics and gnecology at U of Rochester in New York.
Dr. Amy Park
Dr. Amy Park is the Section Head of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery at the Cleveland Clinic, and a co-host of the BackTable OBGYN Podcast.
Cite This Podcast
BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2024, March 19). Ep. 49 – Women’s Health at Risk: Climate Change Realities [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com
Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.