BackTable / OBGYN / Podcast / Transcript #36
Podcast Transcript: Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Tips & Tricks
with Dr. Mark Hoffman and Dr. Amy Park
In this episode, host Dr. Amy Park interviews co-host Dr. Mark Hoffman about laparoscopic hysterectomies. You can read the full transcript below and listen to this episode here on BackTable.com.
Table of Contents
(1) Choosing Laparoscopic vs Robotic Surgery
(2) Special Considerations for Surgery: BMI & Endometriosis
(3) Tips & Tricks for Patient Positioning
(4) Uterine Manipulator & Draping Supplies
(5) Achieving Surgical Entry
(6) The Step-by-Step Hysterectomy
(7) Closure for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
(8) Considerations for Hysterectomies Involving Larger Uteri
Listen While You Read
Follow:
Subscribe:
Sign Up:
[Dr. Amy Park]
Here we are, another week and it's another episode with my esteemed, usually co-host, Mark Hoffman. This is a special pick-your-brain episode and I'm happy to get your thoughts because we're going to talk about laparoscopic hysterectomy today. As a MIG surgeon, I feel like you've had special insight into laparoscopic hysterectomy. I'm looking forward to hearing your tips and tricks and also just the evolution of MIGS over the course of your career. When did you go to fellowship?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I did fellowship from 2010 to 2012. I've been out since year 12, I think for me in practice.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Yes, I like to say MIGS is where your going was 20 years ago. I think over the course of your career, it's become this additional fellowship not like specialized training to actually on its way to becoming a specialty, because people couldn't really conceive of what MIGS was before.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I think the name didn't help either because like MIGS is the standard of care, like minimally invasive surgery is how we're all trying to do surgery. As we talked in the last episode with you, vaginal hysterectomy is certainly minimally invasive. I think they're talking now about changing the name. I got a note on one of the AGL things from Arnie that they're going to try to change it to complex GYN surgery or complex gynecologic disorders or something, which we've talked about for years.
I remember when I was looking for jobs and I talked to John Delancey, he laughed. He was like, "You sound like us 20 years ago, exactly what you said." I think that defining what we do based on the pathology, not the approach, was what we've all been talking about for years. I think when you think of MIGS, it's endometriosis, fibroids, pelvic pain, AUB, things like that. I'm really focusing on those disorders that I think have maybe not gotten the attention that they deserve over the course of the last little bit. It's an exciting time to be a part of it, for sure.
[Dr. Amy Park]
How many fellowships were around when you first started and how many are there now?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
There were 20 and 10 of them were one-year apprenticeships. I only applied, I think 10. Now there's 60, and they're all two years, some are three. There was a high degree of variability from program to program. Some were 0% robotics, some were 100% robotics, some had a research component. It was starting to become more formalized around the time that I was a fellow, but some of the fellowships were really, really different and they likely wouldn't have been able to be fellowships today. It's a testament to the hard work of the people at MIGS, the fellowship group who have put in a lot of time outside of their jobs to really elevate what we're doing to look more like the other board specialties in our field.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Tell us about your backgrounds, like in residency, what were you doing in terms of approach for cases and then fellowship, and then what you do now?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I'm from Kentucky and did my medical school at University of Kentucky, and there's a little bit of laparoscopy there. I think there were some people doing some interesting stuff. When I got to residency at the University of Chicago, my program director, who's great, and it was a great place to train, but she said, "You like laparoscopy, but we don't. Good luck trying to figure out how to do," because that was my personal statement. I knew laparoscopic surgery just from being a medical student. I was watching videos like, I don't even know if YouTube was a thing, but watching surgical videos and really spending a lot of time trying to understand how to get that fellowship.
That was my goal coming into residency day one, was to be a mixed fellow. A lot of it was DIY. There was no program. There was a couple of people really just barely starting to do some robotics cases, and probably saw a handful of TLHs. By the time I was a third and fourth-year resident, there were cases where I was the best surgeon in the room, not-- I guess I was the best at laparoscopy in that room, not the best surgeon per se, but there were some people who were operating who were great surgeons who just did not have laparoscopic skills.
That was something that I put together on my own little lap trainer in the hallway, I think we've talked about this before, but to really just try to get good at using the instruments. When I got a case, if it was on the fence of whether we would convert or not, I could do as much, I think technically as we would need to do to complete the case. I didn't always know the surgical things, because you've got attendants who know the right answer, but to be able to technically grab the tissue and separate tissue and do those things, I could do that and cases closed more often than some of my peers early on. That was a focus of mine, I really wanted to get good at it, just throwing knots and things like that laparoscopically.
Matching for a fellowship for me was a huge deal. It was something I've been working towards for a very long time. I was really excited to go, especially to go to Michigan where I did my undergrad. It was like going back home a little bit for me, so that was amazing. Michigan was very different from my residency in a lot of ways. One of the biggest was that they had six da Vinci's in 2010. [unintelligible 00:05:54] was there before, he was gone by the time I got there, but his footprint or his fingerprints were all over that place because there were six da Vinci's. It was really a well-run robotic program there in a way that a lot of places still aren't even doing now over a decade later.
There was one da Vinci at the University of Kentucky, at the entire institution when I came to Kentucky in 2012, and it was at a different hospital from where I operated. Again, you go from no, for minimal laparoscopy, the resident to, not 100% robotics, but heavy, heavy robotics to basically no robotics. I didn't have OR time at the place where they had the robot, it was scratching a little bit to get on the robot. Ultimately it was like, I just can't do these cases if I need the robot because I can't get on.
I stopped using the robot about eight years ago and was doing 100% straight stick traditional laparoscopy. It was actually really good for me to push myself a little bit and just to show that I could really do any of the cases I need to do with traditional laparoscopy. I've recently gotten back on the XI. We have a lot of residents who want to be robot-trained by the time they leave residency and at least to have some experience. I was like, I should be part of that training to some degree, and so I had to go back [chuckles] and get recertified. The guy training me was like, "You've done this before, right?" [chuckles] and I was like, "Yes, in 100 cases."
It had been a while since I'd done it, but I wanted to make sure I did all the right steps and all those things. I've done probably 30 cases in the last six months, just getting back on the console, which I think there's some good about it. There are some things that I'm still getting used to again, but in most of the big tough cases we do straight stick, the biggest uteruses I've done, I think big pathology, sometimes straight stick is a little bit easier.
[Dr. Amy Park]
It sounds like you did not much laparoscopy in your residency to 100% robotics at the start of robotic surgery, and then conventional, because lack of access to the robot to now getting back on it, because you have more access?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes. Now they've got three, I think maybe including a single port, which I've never played with yet at the other hospital, but we have an XI at the hospital we're up right now. I have reasonable access to it. It's one of those things where I've always said, surgery is not a place for dabblers. If I'm going to do it, I need to make sure that I do enough robotic volume to feel comfortable and confident in using it. Cases where I wouldn't necessarily need it and definitely getting back on there more just to-- It's not just the surgery, it's all the other setup and all the other stuff that can make surgeries go well or not as well. Positioning of the robot and the patient, and the bed in the room and all those things and the boom.
It's just extra variables that you're not as used to, or you don't have to deal with traditional laparoscopy. It's streamlining and unconscious competence, those types of things that you work for years to get good at. I have to invest time and get reps and get touches to get back there for robotics.
(1) Choosing Laparoscopic vs Robotic Surgery
[Dr. Amy Park]
Can you tell me, what are your criteria? How do you decide on who you're going to take for conventional laparoscopy versus robotic, what your thinking is and why do you choose conventional for the biggest and hardest cases? I'm curious about all of it.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
In general, the answer is just whatever room I'm in, it doesn't have a huge impact. The one type of case that really made me want to go back to the robot was myomectomy. There's a lot of sewing and it's a lot of weird angles. Sometimes you don't get to make your hysterectomy in the most comfortable angle for traditional laparoscopy because you're not going to have wristed instruments. If you're doing a vertical closure, it's a little bit of more of an angle potentially. You're sewing two and three and four layers on a closure of a hysterectomy. It's a lot. To be able to do that robotically is just a lot easier, honestly.
I don't know that it's better, it's just easier for me in doing this long cases. By the end of a long myomectomy with multiple fibroids and multiple hysterectomies, robots, that's the one case where I try to get those on the robot when I can. I also do a lot of mini-lap myomectomies too, if they're anterior pathology, if they're getting a c-section anyway, like why fight with all this equipment and then still have to make a three-centimeter or two-centimeter incision to get the fibroids out, when you could just do the entire thing through a four or five-centimeter incision, the mini-laparotomy is something I learned actually in residency. I had an attendant who did a bunch of abdominals or collages with unbelievably small mini-lap incisions, like crazy.
Got the residency and Syngeta Sinopoli at Chicago was the first mixed person I got to work with. I was like, this is going to be great. We'll do this robotic case and she did a mini-lap and I was like, that's so lame, and then we did it and it was like, okay, that was amazing. We did the entire case through a tiny little incision. A lot of it is just get your MRI and see where the pathology is. If it's posterior and low, I'm not going to be able to get that through a mini-lap. You're going to have to do--
Laparoscopy improves your ability to access those fibroids. It's 3D modeling using MRI in my mind, just visualizing the case before I do it, how am I going to get at this fibroid, where are the vessels, where's the ovary, where's the fallopian tube and where are my vessels? If I'm going to have to go anterior here, then posterior there, and trying to really imagine how many hysterectomies I'm going to have to make and what angle, if it gets to be more complex for me personally, just fatigue and things like that, the robot can make that a little more user-friendly, I think.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
That's not for myomectomy. How about for a hysterectomy? How do you decide?
[Dr. Amy Park]
For hysterectomy, it doesn't matter much for me. When I say big pathology, if it's a uterus that's above the umbilicus, two and three-kilo uteruses, what I like about traditional laparoscopy, and I know the XI, you can move the camera around. It's just more steps to like tell your assistant, to like take the camera out and move the arms around, whereas I can just put the camera in different port sites. Each step of a hysterectomy is going to be very different in a 3000-gram uterus. You're going to have to take each step a little differently, and that's where port placement matters and those kinds of things.
I think you can get into smaller spaces and you can get into little tighter areas with traditional laparoscopy. Again, I think the more I do, the more touches I get with the robot these days. We just did one the other day that was around two kilos. It was with a partner and did it robotically, that's the other thing. When my partners, someone asked me to come do a case with her and she does primarily robotics. I have a partner from colorectal surgery who does our endo cases together and he doesn't care to use the robot. We do those straight sticks. It's also with comfort, I know a lot of urologists are robot only. A lot of times if I'm doing a co-case, it depends on what the other person wants to use. I don't have a strong preference. Honestly, I don't have a comfort level with one versus the other where it makes me want to choose one versus the other.
(2) Special Considerations for Surgery: BMI & Endometriosis
[Dr. Amy Park]
How about BMI or prior vertical midline or any of those things, endos like concomitant endo, does that make a difference?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes. Again, it's been about six months, I think ask me again in a year or two, and I might have a different opinion. We've got a pretty good system and setup for those endo cases, especially when my colorectal colleagues are there and we're pretty efficient with it. I think with prior abdominal surgery, most of the adhesive disease we deal with is C-section-related, for the most part. That's the biggest reason why in terms of our uterine adhesions is C-section. That's something that I don't lose a whole lot of sleep about that part of the surgery. For me, there's the bowel involved in those kinds of things.
That's where there's a little bit more, it's a little less routine, you want to be more careful there and that's having, again, straight stick versus robotic, I'm not as worried about that either. It doesn't impact my decision too much between the two.
[Dr. Amy Park]
BMI doesn't matter to you either?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes, it's a good point. I think, where we are geographically in Kentucky, we have a much larger BMI than most patients. I do think there is a role for robotics just in terms of fatigue and things like that. Just trying to crank in those trocars and things like that over long cases, the robot can be a little bit more helpful, a little bit more reach probably with the da Vinci, with the robot compared to traditional laparoscopy. That's probably one area that the new robot tables move. Used to be you had to undock the robot, if you wanted to change Trendelenburg, you wanted to actually move the patient. That was a huge deal with the old systems.
Now with the newer beds, it actually connects to the robot so you can move them around while the robots dock. That was a pretty big game changer, I think, for patients. A lot of times for our very large patients, getting T-burg can be tough, and getting the bowel out of the pelvis can be tough. You'll want to get them steep and then your anesthesiologist taps you through the drape and says, "Can we get her out of T-burg for a few minutes," and you're doing a bit of a dance. "Give me five minutes here. I'll get this side. We'll give you five minutes back," and going back and forth. I think it's less of a problem now. I think that's a good place for robotics is the larger BMI patients for sure.
Do you use robots much for your-- What do you guys use?
[Dr. Amy Park]
I had a similar trajectory in terms of, I trained during fellowship. I did only a conventional laparoscopy. I trained at McGee, so it was Ted Lee and Suketu Mansuria doing a lot of conventional laparoscopy for endo and fibroids and hysterectomies. They don't do a lot of myomectomies, mostly hysterectomies. I came to fellowship and I did it during 2006 to 2009 and that's when the robot first came out. I trained doing the robot and we were all on the learning curve. These cases were taking a long time. The teams were not very framed up on the robot, so we were all learning together. Looking back on it, it's so painful. The teams are so much better now, so much better now.
Just laparoscopy in general and robotic teams. I can't say enough about how crucial it is. All surgeons know this, but it is so crucial [chuckles]. I'll say it again. It's crucial to have a good team. For open cases and vaginal cases, I think Kelly or Haney Clamps are pretty basic, but it's just really hard to function in laparoscopy without a team that can help troubleshoot because you're scrubbed in, and you know that, we all know that. Anyway, I trained doing both the robot and conventional laparoscopy doing sacrocopal pexis and HISS. Then I came out in fellowship and I did robotic cases, but I was so much faster doing a conventional.
It would shave off at the minimum 45 minutes. When you added up that 45 minutes extra at the minimum, and then the turnover time because it takes longer to turn over the robotic case--
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Multiple cases a day.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Yes. I was a young mom at the time and I'm still a young mom.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
You're still a young mom.
[Dr. Amy Park]
I'm still a young mom, but I'm a mom. I was a mom of young children. [chuckles] The bottom line was, I wanted to do more cases and I wanted to get home so that I could see the kids because they were going to bed at 6:37, 7:38. You just couldn't book more than two majors.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes. I think with the robot now, like you said, with the teams, it's getting closer, it's getting close. The other reason why I think and I'll choose robot over traditional laparoscopy for certain cases, certain times during resident education when it's just me, I don't have a resident to assist me. I can do the whole case myself with the robot. I don't need anyone holding the camera, I don't have to have a surgical assistant. There are fewer people that are needed for at least the surgical part of it. The other part is the uterine manipulator. What do you do for that? Do you guys always have students available or who?
[Dr. Amy Park]
We roll deep here. We have a resident and a fellow usually, but even if we don't have a resident, we'll have a surgical assist or a PA who can come in and help.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
It's a game changer robotically because right now we're getting, with medical students, and man, I feel so bad for them, but they have a tough job. They're watching TV backwards, holding the manipulator, and they don't know what you want to see. With traditional laparoscopy, I can grab their hand and hold it and say, "Hold it right here," and then I can work again. With robotics, I have to tell them and I just don't get it. It's not their fault. It's just like, I need to rotate and push up. It's like, I'm going back and forth. We're actually looking into maybe getting a uterine positioning system or at least asking for one. No one's told me I can have it., but--
[Dr. Amy Park]
I was going to say, I know that they sell those positioning systems.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
We use them in fellowship and they kept the-- When you took the bed, the legs of the bed would come up, it would break the bracket and they went through a couple of those, but the newer ones I think are not the same construction. The same idea is, you can just hold it and move it and then go back to work and stuff. I think because we are short on staffing nationally and we don't have a bunch of extra hands in the OR and students are not always there and residents are not always there, that's a pretty key part of the case. At least I think so for the case.
I think I was having dinner with maybe Barbara years ago and she was like, "If someone calls you in for the OR for help, where's the first place you go? Between the legs." She goes every time, just someone needs to show you where to go. I can help someone do the entire TLH with a manipulator showing them where to go. That's usually where the learning curve, I think is the toughest, just how a uterine manipulator can be super helpful. I think that's something that is a super important part of a TLH.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Absolutely. You choose your agnostic on robotic versus conventional laparoscopy for your hysterectomy. It sounds like size or BMI maybe, but prior surgeries don't really phase you too much or endometriosis.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Endometriosis will always phase me, but it's like if I had two giant strong friends going into a bar, I'd be less nervous about getting punched in the face, like going into a tough endo case with a colorectal surgeon or someone who's used to doing those cases with you, it makes those cases-- We're more prepared to do them. They're still tough, I still have a lot of respect for endometriosis for sure.
(3) Tips & Tricks for Patient Positioning
[Dr. Amy Park]
Yes, absolutely. Tell me about when you go into the OR and what are your tips and tricks for positioning and getting access and all that stuff. I will say, just circling back to the point that you said about using the robot when you don't have assistants, I know a lot of our fellows who went into private practice, they just use the robot because it's just so much easier when you don't have a resident or fellowship. For me, since I'm pretty much always operating with a trainee, I like conventional because I get to operate.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I also think teaching is a lot easier because I go back and forth, but I think with traditional operations, I can grab their hand and be like," Hold this way, move that way," you're right there, and with the robot, there's a little bit of separation. I think OR setup, and whenever I have a new student or any new learner and interns and stuff, it's the same talk every time. This is the part of surgery that isn't super exciting and fun, but it's certainly one of the most important parts of any case, it's just getting your room ready. Number one, go back to the room before the patient gets there. It makes me nuts when residents are strolling in after the patient's asleep.
I'm like, "We're halfway done." We've already done the setup for them, whether you have a pink pad or whether you have egg crate foam or whatever, go back and make sure. In my case this morning, they had the sheets and the egg crate foam not how I want it. I know how to make a bed, I know how to put the sheets on and make sure it's right, because once the patient's on the bed, now getting it fixed is super tough. I would say, after you talk to your patient, go through everything, beat them to the OR, and make sure things are set up. You have the instruments. Do you have the tools you need to do the job? You said, team, team, team.
My goodness, am I lucky in my job to have a team that I'm pretty reliably or consistently operating with? I'll get texts at 6.30, "What's the deal today for this case," they'll pull stuff ahead of time. They know my routine, they know what we need and if there are certain variables, are we going to need the tissue extraction bag, is this a big one, is this endo, what are we dealing with? The team is a huge part of the setup. Knowing who we got, making sure, I know we are-- I don't know if you do this. I walk into ORs, I always look to see who else is operating that day. Who are the other surgeons around? Who can I call, who can run over if I need something, just to know who's around?
I think having that in your mind of like, is this a case where I'm going to need something? I don't call folks in the OR very often, but it's nice to just have that habit so you know who's around. OR Setup, understand how you want your patients positioned, but again, I use, we just got the pink pad strapped to the bed for a long time, it was just cheap egg crate foam. I always position the patients myself with the residents. I don't stroll in once they're asleep and drape. How they're positioned can make an easy case hard and can make a hard case impossible laparoscopically.
We talked a little bit about this, but once the patients are asleep, they need to be in-- I always use some Allen stirrup, something like that every time, yellow fins or something., slide them down so their sacrum is supported, but their butt's hanging off the edge, arms tuck at the side. Always, I cannot for the life of me, figure out why people still-- Like every once in a while, I'll hear someone who's like, we'll have an arm out for laparoscopy and I cannot figure it out.
There are a few reasons why arm tucking is such a huge part of it. Number one, that's where I'm standing. If the arms are out, I'm not comfortable, I'm going to be in pain. We've been lucky to hear you tell us about ergonomics, but you got to go have the arms tuck. I don't usually use sleds unless I have to. Even pretty big patients, we can tuck arms. Make sure the elbows, and wrists are padded, the thumbs are up, arms tuck to the side and really it's pushing on that elbow, like tucking the elbow a little bit underneath them, straightens the arm and keeps stuff from falling off. If it's a loose tuck, you get a nap. If their elbows are falling off the bed, we start over. I'll do that myself too with the residents. I'm like, all right, this is what we want, feel this, because those are the things you can't really rely on other people to know how to do because when teams change and rotate, you got to go own that. You got to go own how the patients are on the bed. Again, early on, someone else does it, and then the patients are sliding under the drape and you're getting to a hard part of the case and start getting some bleeding, now you got to go take them out of T-burg because the patient's sliding off the bed, it's a never event in my OR.
You got to go be able to focus on the variables, which is the patient. Once the patient comes in, I try to keep variables at a minimum. Everybody gets an OG. I don't care if they've had no surgery and we're going to go through them. I may end up having to go through Palmer's point, but I don't want to have to remember to put an OG in. Everybody gets an OG, I give all my hysterectomies peridium pre-op, like an hour or two before they get a dose of peridium. When we systole later, their pee's orange, a lot of the folks when they get their OG and they're like, "What, did they drink orange drink," I'm like, "No, that's just the peridium."
[Dr. Amy Park]
I do the same thing with the OG and the peridium. The peridium also increases the void trial pass rate by about 15% is what it shows in at least urogynecologic surgery. Occasionally, we can't give it because they have some renal issue or something, but I think it's super helpful.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
It's cheap, it works, and then also they probably are less likely to complain of dysuria afterwards too from having a Foley.
[Dr. Amy Park]
The Foley tortures patients. It's a bladder analgesic too.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes, for sure.
(4) Uterine Manipulator & Draping Supplies
[Dr. Amy Park]
What do you use for your uterine manipulator?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
We have V-Care now. I was used to using a residency or a fellowship. I think they had a roomie and then I came here, I was using a zoomy and a co-cup. Zoomie's good for certain cases. It's not great for a big giant uterus. It's pretty malleable, which is not what you want when you want to have some torque. We have V-Care now. I was not something I'd ever use it. A little bit of a learning curve to figure out, like a little bit different visual landmarks, I think compared to a traditional co-ring. We use V-Care now and I'm pretty comfortable with it.
I think the other big thing when I first get in, the timeout. I know we get a lot of folks that rush the timeouts. I make everybody stop what they're doing every time, and we introduce everybody by first names. That was something they did in fellowship, I love it. That's tech students, anesthesia providers, medical students, we all want everyone's name, we want to know it and we ask them until everybody feels like they're part of the team. That's going to increase safety. Someone's going to speak up more likely if we use first names. Everyone knows I'm a surgeon. I don't need doctor so-and-so in the ORs and that's based on some airline safety data.
That was something again, they did in fellowship that we try to carry into the ORs. Creating that safe environment, no one's yelling and screaming, it's all pretty quiet and calm. Even the crazier things get, the little more chill we have to be to make sure we get through things safely. Creating that environment is a huge part of setting up for surgery. Once we're set up, prepped and draped fully, I always do the Foley on the field. If you ever need a backfill, having it placed after it's draped, this is again a little pet peeve, but like if you put the Foley in first and then you drape over, then the Foley's like sitting by their butt and under the drape in the non-sterile area.
If you have to dig it out and backfill-- If you just put it in after it's draped, you've got access to it, so always after it's draped, manipulator in. One thing I've started to do for robotics cases because I'm not, I've had a few cases where again, if someone's manipulating and they're not doing it as frequently, they can pull back by accident and aren't sure where it is. I've started sewing the co-cup in. There's a couple of vicral stitches at three and nine o'clock and then sew it to the co-ring. They can't mess it up. It can't move once it's in and set, they can't pull it out by accident. An additional step, but since I'm not at bedside and I can't grab it and see what's going on, I've started sewing it in during the robotics cases. What do you use for your manipulator?
[Dr. Amy Park]
Oh, V-Care.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes. Ultimately, I think the VA we have the Arnie's Cooper Arch, which is nice. It's a little stiffer. I think they're more expensive, that's why we've not been able to get them at Miami most of the time.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Do you use a robotic drape or you use a LEVH or do you do both?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
LEVH for everything, but the robotics cases. Then we'll take, for the robots, it's leg drapes. We'll just use a lap/cole drape, and then I cut from the bottom, like between the legs all the way up, almost to the abdominal opening. To keep it from sliding off, I think one of our arm fellows came up with, you just take the ends and tie it around the handles for the stirrups. It ties it onto the feet basically, so you don't have any movement on those drapes and it works like a charm. It's the little simple things like that, but just tying the ends of the drape onto the stirrups keeps it from moving around.
(5) Achieving Surgical Entry
[Dr. Amy Park]
Then how do you achieve entry? You have the OG and do you do a Hasson on, do you do direct entry, do you use Veress?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I try to use Veress. Again, this is open in residency, open entry. Fellowship, we did a lot of Hasson. I've heard now, but I think everyone's telling me they all do open entry. If they've had no prior surgery, I'll go in with a Veress in the belly button or just right at the base of the umbilicus, and then Palmers and left upper quadrant if they've had any prior surgery. If they've ever had any open surgery or if they just had a laparoscopy, I would be okay with an umbilical Veress, but more and more data and just anecdotal stuff. Just Palmers is such an easy, safe place to get in. If they've had basically any prior surgery, I'll go in Palmers. What do you do?
[Dr. Amy Park]
I do direct.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
For all fives?
[Dr. Amy Park]
I do fives and then I do a left lower quadrant eight, so I don't have to-
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
You still don't have to close fascia, right?
[Dr. Amy Park]
-closed fascial.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Closing fascial is my least favorite part of any case.
[Dr. Amy Park]
I've had too many ilioinguinal or iliohypogastric nerve entrapments, not that it's that many, but just having a couple is too many. The rate is low, but it's like, they have so much pain from there, and then you have to inject.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
We had to go in one and cut a stitch out and redo it. It was actually a patient from another hospital or a colleague of mine, their patient. It happened to be here and we took care of it, but you also don't need to do it. This is something I learned too, is all ports bigger than five, or bigger than eight, but anything you're going to need to close, keep a midline. You can go suprapubic with a big one, you can go umbilical. The other thing is, if you need to extend it, you've got a pathology that's a little bigger and you're having trouble getting it out, you're not going to extend a right or left thoracic quadrant port. You're not going to make that bigger if you're pulling your pathology through there.
If you've got a suprapubic incision, you can make that into fan steel or mini lap. You can certainly turn an umbilical incision into a vertical midline. Being able to extend those incisions, and the fact that you're never going to get nerve entrapment with those incisions, I would say, unless there's a strong reason why you have to-- Sometimes for staplers and other types of surgeries we don't do, I can see that, but unless I'm doing like a dermoid and need to put a big port in, I try to keep everything with all fives.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Where do you put your ports?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
For normal sized uterus, the camera through the base of the umbilicus, and then right and left thoracic quadrant-
[Dr. Amy Park]
Zero degree?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
-always a five-degree zero scope, unless I have big pathology. If there's a reason why I need to use it, that's fine. It's one more variable, but for most cases, zero's all I need, I know some people are pretty married to the angle scopes, but for me, a zero gets the job done, I would say, 19 times out of 20. Right and left thoracic quadrant ports, that was a study, [chuckles] I think it was Michigan too, they were trying to avoid injuring an ilioinguinal and an OR hypogastric vessels, the ascending arteries in the abdominal wall, five centimeters cephalide to the ASIS and two centimeters medial.
It's a little high for most cases, so a lot of the mixed people are doing two and two, so finding the ASIS, two centimeters cephalide, two centimeters medial too, and you're rarely going to find anything. I can't tell you if I've ever had, and I'm sure I will, but an arterial injury through a trocar injury, if you're over there unless you're really midline.
[Dr. Amy Park]
If you skive, I think you can--
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Perpendicular to the dome, you got to go really--
[Dr. Amy Park]
Yes, you can get the inferior epigastrics if you really skive, and there's not a lot of room, or you're just traversing a lot of adipose below the skin, and you're just going at this trajectory. I have had it maybe twice or something, but if you just put a stitch around it, it's fine.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I really like the applied balloon ports. I don't know if you guys use those, but I've become very dependent on those because with especially bigger patients, the five-millimeter ports just slide out, and you're like, where's my instrument? You have to keep going back and putting it back in. The balloon ports are 88% proof. Once they're in and they're inflated, they're amazing, even for big patients, even for really thick abdominal walls, they're my go-to for sure, every time.
[Dr. Amy Park]
How do you decide which one you're going to do a two laterals versus a suprapubic, or do you always do suprapubic?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I'm an ipsilateral, so I stand on the patient's right, and I'll make two incisions on the right, an ipsilateral. I'm trying to do more and my residents will say I don't do it enough. It's just having them start over there because if I'm having them operate from the patient's left, they're going to be holding the camera with one arm and using one instrument with their left hand.
They're going to be doing a lot more operating if they're on my side. I do think suprapubic, like a diamond pattern is much better for teaching because you can share that midline port and hand it back and forth, but I trained with an ipsilateral suturing, and it's just much easier to do that. Most people I know do ipsilateral. Do you guys use-- What do you do?
[Dr. Amy Park]
I do two left-sided ports.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
You're on the patient's left?
[Dr. Amy Park]
Surgeons are on the left, and then I'm usually doing the camera on the right. I use my left hand driving the camera from the umbilicus, and then my right hand in the right lower quadrant.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
My new partner has it set up, and then my old partner would do a suprapubic. I think for myomectomies, the other thing is for myomectomies because I know I'm pulling fibroids out of a mini-lap fan steel, I just put a little gel point mini there to start the case and use that as my suprapubic port, so I don't have to make an extra incision just to get the fibroids out. I'll do that for myomectomies specifically but for straight-stick myomectomies. For HYSTs, yes, same setup always, and for the fourth port, I'll just go in between my right lower quadrant and my umbilical.
For larger pathology, you've got to be able to get around the top of the uterus. Camera's got to be at least four-ish, four or five centimeters above the fundus, because also, once you get your upper pedicles, the uterus is coming out, so it's going to come past you anyway. You've got to be able to do that. Also, you can't put your lateral ports too far down, because you're not going to be able to get across the uterus as well, you have to come over it a little bit. You have to bring your ports up a little bit further north, but it's a bowel because you also need to close the cuff. You have to keep them low enough that you can still get into the pelvis. That's where most of the action is in a hysterectomy is deep in the pelvis.
(6) The Step-by-Step Hysterectomy
[Dr. Amy Park]
Walk me through, what's your usual steps, because I assume you have the same steps over and over again? I know when I was training, it was like, restore normal anatomy. Take these pedicles first, and do it the same way every time. What are your steps every time?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Typically, assume we can see the uterus and if there's bowel and things like that like you said, restore normal anatomy. If they have anterior adhesions, C-section scar stuff, I save that for last, because in some ways it holds it up. I think a lot of times you start digging in there and it's bleeding, you can't see very well. Getting your blood supply number one is important to do early. Start with the fallopian tubes, now that we know these tubes need to come out, I get the tubes out of the way. I know a lot of people just leave them.
If you're doing a HYST without BSO, I think if you wait, get your tubes till later, there's an opportunity to forget. If you take the fallopian tubes from distal to proximal and on the mesencephalics and let them dangle in the way, and just take them with uterus, it's going to be in your way. I always take the fallopian tubes first, just as if you're doing a self-injecting sterilization, and do that first.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Are you using Ligature, or what's your bipolar?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Ligature, that's what we have, Ligature, yes. I can never get on the harmonic train. I want to know that I've sealed my vessels before I transect them.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Which one do you use, the Maryland-tip or the blunt-tip?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I do, yes, Maryland-tip.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Maryland tip, okay.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I like the blunt-tip, it was fine. I didn't notice a huge difference.
[Dr. Amy Park]
For me, the ergonomics is more difficult with the Maryland, because you have to really have your hands wide in order to close it.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Right, and I think there's two steps with the blunt. You clip it, and then you hit the button, and then you do this, versus it's a lot faster. I have larger hands, so ergonomically, it's fine. It was designed, fortunately for me, for hands like mine, but I can just zip, zip, zip right along because it's all fluid motion like that. The Maryland-tip, depending on the size. If it's a normal-sized uterus, I typically get my uterovarians first. Actually, I think it's a little easier to have the contralateral person take the uterovarians, so the person on the patient's right to get the left uterovarians, just an easy angle and very natural.
Seal three wide pedicles or three wide bites, and then go right in the middle, so you've got a bit of a pedicle on each side, and then sort of carry it along the round ligament, like the round ligament is a clothesline. You're just sealing along to about the midpoint of the round ligament, and that'll lateralize those ovaries and get them out of your way. It's that triangle of the infundibular pelvic to the uterovarian to the round, and the external iliac is that triangle, and there's pretty safe. Once you get your uterovarians, you can just pretty easily scoot along under the round to drop your ovaries laterally.
For larger pathology, where you can't get that angle and come across the uterus and get your uterovarians, starting with the rounds, either way is fine. I also have the resident's practice starting with the round, because they're going to be operating potentially independently in private practice, and they won't have the same level of assistance. The alternative is to start with the rounds, open up a window through the broad, and then take your uterovarians on your side from lateral to medial across in the same way, and that still drops the ovaries out. Then get the rounds. If you have significant anterior pathology, I'll just wait on getting my anterior broad, I'll just go posteriorly.
That's another important step that I think can really save your blood loss and keep you out of trouble. Carrying that posterior peritoneum down to the level of the co-ring posteriorly, and then finding your uterines, skeletonizing them posteriorly, and forget what's happening anteriorly. You can see your uterines, you can just bluntly, just anterior, just open up the space, just put your instrument in, open up the tips, just slowly open it up. Almost every time, you can find that white pubocervical fascia that's being pushed up by the co-cup, with having done zero anterior dissection on the bladder or the anterior leaf of the broad, and push that bladder up and out. Because in any C-section, ideally you're not putting any stitches through the uterines, you're somewhere medial to that. There should be a space, even if it's small, to where you can push that bladder anteriorly, get your uterines, and now we've gotten our entire blood supply, and we haven't even done the anterior broad, we haven't even started with the bladder.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Question. I agree about skeletonizing the posterior peritoneum, I think it's a nice trick. Do you look for the ureter while you're doing that? It usually drops it down when you pull down that peritoneum, but do you specifically take a look while you're doing that, or you just know where it is?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I always look initially, they're always just so far lateral from unless we're doing a USO or BSO, I want to see that in the sidewall when I'm taking my IP, obviously. If I've got my ovary out and I've got my round, I'll want to peek at it, but unless there's disease, like endo and things like that, it's going to be way away. If I've got the manipulator pushed way up, and--
[Dr. Amy Park]
I agree about the pushing it up and so that the cup is just pushing the ureters down.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I'm always looking for this, I call it my golden view, my critical view. It's like, you've been to London where they have like the subway signs, it's the red circle with like the blue little rectangle with the station name in it. That to me is the view. I want to see the anterior cup, I want to see the posterior cup, I want to see the ring and I want to see the vessels on either side. If I've got that ring, it's like, okay, I'm good. I now feel like I've got everything I need to see. I don't care how big the uterus is, I don't care what pathology I've got. When I get that view, it's just like, okay, we know where we are, we know where our vessels are, we know our uterines are lateral. If I've got the cup pushed up enough, I can take my vessels medial to the cup. You never need to be lateral to the cup, that's sort of your lateral margin for operating. I think you get into trouble when you start chasing, when things are being pushed up and elevated way up at the cup, everything else that you want to stay away from should be low and lateral.
If you don't have a good assistant and you're not having them really push up, you're sort of pushing everything in and down and you're putting your instruments towards those things you want to avoid, like the uterus. I think really elevating the vaginal cuff, the cervicovaginal junction, you want that up and elevated as much as possible, and I think that's going to be one of the things you'll really get in trouble.
[Dr. Amy Park]
So meaning cephalad and flexed.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Correct. Away from them--
[Dr. Amy Park]
Antiflex.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Towards me. If I'm operating on my side, I'll say, point the uterus at my assistant and like you want to stab them with the uterus. Then I'll say, okay, now stab me with the uterus and my resident can work on the left side. That allows them to understand, and sometimes, like I said, well, I'll put my hand on there on the manipulator and say, okay, you can feel how hard I'm pushing up here. We don't want to traumatize anybody, but you can push up pretty hard and by pushing up hard, it really allows us, not necessarily to keep everything bad away, but it allows us to see our anatomy on tension to help differentiate where we want to be and where we don't want to be.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Where do you take the uterines?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Just at the level of the Koh cup.
[Dr. Amy Park]
That corresponds to internal os basically, right?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes. I know that if the uterines are coming up over the rim of the Koh, that cup is the cervical vaginal junction, so I'm taking them at that level and I'm using the Koh cup as my sort of lateral border. I'm not going out lateral if I can help it. The number of times I've had to open the pelvic sidewall and get the uterine at the origin, I can count on one hand where I felt like I had to do that. It's just something even in the biggest pathology, once you get down to the cervix, I feel like I can see the uterines, it's fine.
[Dr. Amy Park]
When you take the uterines, do you go at a right angle once you skeletonize the uterines, and then do you transect it like perpendicular and then make that into a pedicle, like make it--
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes, sort of. I'll come because where our ports are coming in from lateral, that's your first bite. I just sort of work my way in more medially, and then I'll actually rotate if it's the Maryland tip because it's a bit of an angle, that'll be more of a vertical bite. Then I'll take it. You don't want to take it too medially because then you get the bleeding from the uterus. You want to give yourself a wide enough pedicle.
Sometimes, once I've got control of the blood supply and it's sealed and I cut it and there's still that part of the uterine that's like right on the Koh cup and I can't quite get to it. Again, that's a great angle to come from the opposite side, from the contralateral side. If my resident on the left side has gotten most of the uterine, but there's still a little bit of that base of it right on the Koh cup I can come from my side and I've got a much better angle to undermine it. That lateralizes the vessel just off the Koh and they can do the same thing from my side.
[Dr. Amy Park]
You go to vertical, like--
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I almost come underneath it. If the ring is like--
[Dr. Amy Park]
Parallel to the cup.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Right.
[Dr. Amy Park]
You make that perpendicular for the uterine and then you go vertical just to like skeletonize that.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Just to lateralize it, just to make sure I get every little bit of it. Yes. Because it'll retract and that's why you want to get it more medially. When it retracts, if there's a little oozing, I've got a pedicle that I can grab and seal without digging laterally. I've got a vessel, I've identified it, there's still normal anatomy lateral to that I can then pick up and seal. I'm staying out of that area because I know the uterine is coming in underneath that somewhere. I want to know that whatever I'm sealing is going to be right where I want to be.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Then tell me about the anterior leaf.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Normally, again, it's just using, as Dr. Lengyel, who is the chair now at Chicago's [unintelligible 00:44:16], "Use what God has given you." I think Ted Lee calls it tissue interrogation, and like you're just pushing in different areas and opening and seeing what gives and what opens. If they haven't had a C-section anteriorly for the broad, you can just go in bluntly with your ligature and open the whole space up.
If they've had prior C-section and there's a lot of anterior adhesive disease, I think again, leaving that anterior scar tissue for last, most of the time, you can get using the Koh cup, that ridge, you can identify the bladder and push it down and almost tunnel across over the Koh and like all the way to the other side and push the bladder down. Then you can sort of address those anterior adhesions last. Sometimes it's just concrete and you've got to get your monopolar scissors and just shave away at it.
For the most part, the bladder is lower than most of the adhesions most of the time. If you're ever not sure, back to the setup, retrograde fill your bladder. If you're not sure where the bladder is, if you can't really see, in almost every instance, coming in more laterals than you think, where the tissue is abnormal with the adhesive disease and scarring is the hardest time to figure out where you are or the toughest place to figure out where you are. Start where the anatomy is normal, laterally. Identify your bladder laterally, push your way up, if you can't really tell what's what, retrograde fill it with some saline, and then you can really push it off, worrying about the abnormal anatomy last once you've sort of figured out where everything else is.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Do you take down the anterior leaf with the ligature or do you use the cautery or do you use--
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Ligature. I use ligature for basically everything with the exception of, unless there's bladder, like it's just the last little bit is just a big fat band of scar tissue and it's probably not bladder, but if I get in, I want to do it cold, I'll just get cold scissors and sometimes use monopolar. I know a lot of places do a lot more monopolar scissors, like Bovie stuff, but I don't use it for the bladder. I'd rather get a bladder injury with a monopolar scissors than a ligature for sure. Also, bladder injuries are just so rare. It's usually pretty easy to figure out where the bladder is.
[Dr. Amy Park]
That's a question because I have heard of several cases of delayed cautery injury to the ureters or to the bladder from using the ligature and--
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Where's the ureteral injury occurring? Is it at the cervicovaginal junction? Is it at the uterovarian or rather IP, I mean?
[Dr. Amy Park]
Yes, I don't really remember, but the thought was that it was from the burning part. I use blunt, so the blunt ligature, so I'll just cut down or I'll use a monopolar cautery to sharp.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Again, I think giving yourself bigger margins. Again, when I've got my uterines, like I'm on that Koh, I'm pushing all that other stuff anteriorly. When I see my uterines, like there is nothing else in my bite but uterine arteries when I can help it. Clearly, there's some times with endo, it's just the anatomy is not the same. When I've given talks on this, when I've given lectures on TLH and stuff, like showing that critical view where I've just, that bladder is off, that posterior leaf of the posterior part of the Koh is like naked. It's just white pubocervical fascia. It's just uterines in my bite if I can help it, and it's above the Koh, so there shouldn't be anything in that bite but vessel.
Clearly, there's always a risk of injury with surgery, and doesn't always mean it's bad technique, but that's, I think, really just getting things as clean as you can before you take that bite.
[Dr. Amy Park]
I agree about going lateral to medial though, and there's like a million AAGL videos about the lateral approach to the difficult anterior dissection. Then I agree, sharp, if you can help it. The other thing I do, on a sacral colpopexy, sometimes I'll just use, well, a lot of times I'll just use the manipulator, like the Deaver for the posterior wall, and then an anterior wall, use a malleable just to spread out the anterior.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
You guys dissect so much more too. I think one of the things is like--
[Dr. Amy Park]
We dissect a lot.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Because I operate with urogynecologists, I watch them do a few typical pexies, and you go, okay, so whatever I think I'm pushing the bladder off and clearing it off the anterior vaginal wall, you can go about five times further than we're going. Obviously, you don't need to do that for a traditional TLH, give yourself a good bite to the closure, which is the other thing.
[Dr. Amy Park]
I agree. Because you know what, I've seen a couple of fistulas from not taking the bladder far enough down, and then they incorporate the bladder into the Vicryl sutures for the cuff, and it's easy to do from the--
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Not recommended.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Yes. Do not recommend. That is something to avoid easily if you just give yourself a margin and just go down a couple of centimeters. Yes. Obviously, you have to use your landmarks with the Koh and everything. How do you know how far down to take the bladder, just going past the cup or how do you figure that out?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I think it's always going to be when it's on tension, it's going to look like you've got more vagina to sew than when you're done. Usually, a couple of centimeters at least, because it's going to end up being about half that I think once the uterus is off. Colpotomy, I always just use monopolar cutting. We use a hook. I think it's a small instrument. I think the scissor is fine. It's just more active energy source out there in the world. The hook is a very small little instrument, small little tip that I can feel more confident. I personally, I control the pedal. I let the residents do the colpotomy cup, but I'll control the pedal cutting and then just make it around. Then if you can pull pathology out, great. If not, we can morcellate in a bag vaginally, or if we have to through a fan steel.
[Dr. Amy Park]
How do where to make colpotomy?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
It's just right on that ridge. Again, having that critical view, having that ring right on that, you can sort of see in the VCare, there's a little divot, like a little ridge, I think not like the Koh cups and things like that, it's more like a corner, but pretty close to the cervix is we would only [unintelligible 00:49:59] as much vagina as possible. Once you see green on the VCare, that's like we're home. Once I see that green plastic, we can chill out because we know we're there. Start anteriorly, work my way posteriorly, and do the same on the other side. Then just cuff closure after that.
(7) Closure for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
[Dr. Amy Park]
How do you maintain pneumo? Do you just stick a lap in or do you glove?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Glove with a couple of Ray-Tecs in there. We count them, obviously, because you don't want to leave that behind. Pull the uterus out, if we're going to morcellate it later, but pull out the manipulator and put the glove in the vagina. Then we'll backload our, so we use V-Loc or I guess Stratafix if it's not on formula or whatever you use, but a barbed suture, and I'll backload it so I don't have to use a big port.
I'll take the lateral port out. I put my instrument through the port. When it's outside the patient, I'll grab the stitch, not the needle, but the stitch. Then I'll use my needle driver as like an introducer, put the needle through the abdominal wall, and then backload the port over top of my instrument and pull it out the same way. I don't have to skew the needle. I'm not worried about messing with the tip. If you try to shove a CP1 through a robotic port, you'll come out and it'll fit sometimes, but the tip of the needle will get bent or will break off.That way you're not messing with the needle, bending, or anything like that.
Then closure, I want to use the mucosa. That's what I'm holding onto when I'm closing the vaginal cuff. Starting with the angle on my own side, I grab the vaginal mucosa. I have it pull across. Again, it's always on tension. My first stitch is just anterior to the uterines, coming out in the midline or just at nine or three o'clock in the vaginal cuff on the right. Then I go in about that same spot. Then I come out at about a 45-degree angle, coming out just posterior to the uterines, making sure I've got fascia.
Then I will tie my loop down medial to the vessels. I don't want to incorporate my vessels. My vessels are lateral. I know my uterines are lateral. Everything is safe, medial to what I'm doing. Same landmarks on both sides. I know that some folks will run just the mucosa and then they'll do the pubocervical fascia back. I do it all in one later. I think the toughest stitch is the opposite angle. You just got to make sure you get vaginal mucosa and fascia on both sides.
[Dr. Amy Park]
You start in the middle and go-- Isn't it double-sided?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
No, it's a loop. I start on my side, on the patient's right, where I stand, and then I'll run to the left. Then I'll get the other angle, and then I'll lock it. My last stitch on the angle, I lock my stitch so it sort of captures, like a loop falls lateral to my last stitch. It sort of sits in between the left uterine and my left angle of the cuff. I know I've got the cuff captured now. Then I run back, just sort of like not quite an imbricating layer per se, but just run back enough times where it's not going to unwind.
Some people will do, again, just the mucosa, and they'll do a pubocervical fascia later. Sometimes they'll do a full second layer. Some people will just like run it back once, a couple of stitches, and cut it. I haven't seen any data necessarily that one versus two layers is better, just as long as you've given yourself enough that barbed suture tail that if it comes undone on one or two stitches, it's still going to be intact.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Do the patients ever feel the barbs?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I have not had anyone complain of the barbs, with the exception of right when they're sort of resuming intercourse. As the stitches dissolve, the loop breaks apart and sort of you get two points, but usually that just sort of like disappears up in the vaginal mucosa. Back when I used to do post-op cuff checks, I stopped doing those after COVID and after some of the studies that were done. I think at Pitt, if they're asymptomatic, we don't do post-op cuff checks. You would see the barbs sometimes, but no, I don't get complaints. Are you getting complaints on barb sutures? Do you guys use barbs for vaginal cuff closures?
[Dr. Amy Park]
You know what, I don't really use the barb sutures. That's why I'm asking. We're doing a lot of these vaginal uterosacrals and you just get a row.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
What do you do for the TLH?
[Dr. Amy Park]
A TLH?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
What do you close it with?
[Dr. Amy Park]
I haven't done TLH in a long time. I'm just doing mostly vaginal.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Robotically, are you doing? I guess same thing, you're just doing mostly vaginal. You're not doing many hysts?
[Dr. Amy Park]
Yes, not doing that many.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Because you're robotic, so they've already had a hyst. You're just doing sacral plexy because you can't get them from below. Or not can't, but like--
[Dr. Amy Park]
For primary uterovaginal prolapse, I'm just doing vaginal surgery.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes, okay. Yes, no, barbed suture has been great and it's monofilament and the other thing is--
[Dr. Amy Park]
Yes, I like PDS, for sure.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
It closes and there's tension along the whole line, so evenly distributed across the suture line. I think it's a great technological advancement for laparoscopic surgery.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Yes, the vaginal cuff dehiscences were a huge problem for a while and that was with the Vicryl, I think.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
They talked about, was it the energy with the monopolar, was it with the robot that we thought we were taking bigger bites? I think a lot of it, ultimately, my theory is, if you've got a hemostatic cuff, I think a lot of the cuff dehiscences, and not that I've seen a lot, it's, again, I think 1% or less is about the national average and I think I'm a little below that. Most of the time, it's some kind of infection, right? It's whether they have a little hematoma that becomes an abscess that then, I think, compromises the healing a little bit and will open up that way and there's usually something else.
I think the more you do, the less blood loss, and the more you're able to keep things drier, I think your dehiscence rate is going to go down quite a bit as well. I think a lot of it, if there's no food for the bacteria, if it's not a big, giant pool of blood sitting right in the cuff, that's a bad combo. That's a big opportunity for an abscess.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Are you giving them both Ancef and Flagyl or Cefazolin and Flagyl?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
We're just looking at that right now. I haven't been adding Flagyl. We're probably going to start doing that pretty soon. We've been using Ancef, but we may switch to Cefazolin as we talked about that last time too, the Michigan study looking at Cefazolin and Flagyl. I think it makes sense. I don't think there's any, the risk is significant. Also for our endo cases when we've got potential bowel surgery, we're using Cefazolin for those too. I think it makes sense just to simplify and keep the same antibiotic for everything. I cysto for every hysterec.
(8) Considerations for Hysterectomies Involving Larger Uteri
[Dr. Amy Park]
What are your tips and tricks for patients who have those big uteri, you already mentioned putting the ports, like edging a little bit more cephalad. It's harder to manipulate the uterus, do you use a tenaculum and put an extra port, or what do you do?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
In general, colleagues always told me fives are free. If you need an extra port, put the extra port in. One extra port is going to be a lot better than a laparotomy. I think number one, it is taking your time. Bleeding, these are tough cases. You want to be able to see. With every bite, just make sure you've got it. There's no very careful dissection, very, very delicate tissue handling. No one's pulling and grabbing things.
Then when you're operating at the edge of what your ability is, take it slow. Don't mess around, waste time, but understand your anatomy. Start with if see your rounds, take your rounds. If you're going to take the peritoneums, if you can see through it, cut it, all the same surgical sort of tenants that we operate by. Sometimes, if the uterus is 30 weeks, I can't really get around to that uterovarian from cephalad to caudate. I may have to take my round, open up the broad and come up towards the head to get my uterovarians that way.
Move the camera around. If I can't quite get this bite, move your camera to a lateral port. See what I can see. Use a 30 degree scope. It's the same views. I want that same critical view. I want to dissect the posterior peritoneum and the anterior peritoneum. I want to do all the same steps on these big-- Don't reinvent the wheel. It's still a uterus. The anatomy, it's all the same blood supply for the most part. It's all the same, bladder anteriorly, bowel posterior. It's all going to be the same. Don't compromise your views. Don't compromise your expectations for what you want to see on these cases because ultimately, the vagina is basically the same. I don't care how big the uterus is. If I've got a Koh cup up there if I can get down there and see it, we have these big, giant uteruses and you finally like push on the cup and you're like, okay, so much work is now paid off. We're sort of like we're home. Now we can work on that stuff and get in the vessels. The other thing is the big uterus is the big, giant vessel. Sometimes it's bigger than my ligature can grab.
Don't forget you have other instruments with a much wider grab. Whether it's a Park or a Maryland or a blunt, just any blunt grasp where you can get a much wider grasp. Grab the vessel with that. It'll compress the vessel. Now I can get my ligature in over top of that and seal it and then seal it and seal it and seal it and seal it and seal it. Don't cut it until you've got the other uterine because if you have back bleeding, it's going to keep bleeding and be worse.
Again, go slow, get your blood supply the same way. I know there's a lot of people that will get the uterine at the origin, at the hypogastric. I've never found that to be particularly useful. The biggest uterus I've removed laparoscopically was 6 kilos, 6,000 grams. That was ridiculous. I'm not sure I would want to recommend that anyone else do that, but the anatomy is the same. It's just big and bulky, and so you got to go slide in laterally and make sure you can see your, those are the ones where you really want to see things all the way down, opening up your sidewall and those kinds of things when needed.
It's just each step, take a breath. What's the goal here? How are we going to get this? If I can't reach it this way, how can I rearrange my ports? How can I rearrange my instrumentation to get this vessel from a better angle? Just taking a step back and looking at all the ports you have, do I need to add one? You have a lot of tools at your disposal in these cases. I think sort of taking a step back and being a little creative sometimes can all of a sudden make a big deal.
I think, and I've told this to a lot of my colleagues when we're doing these hard cases, it's not usually that the whole case is hard. Rarely you'll get a case where just everything is awful. Usually, you get to a point and go, okay, I don't really know what to do right now. That's when you call for help and say, hey, have them seen by your partner or someone who's a specialist and have them come in and they go, okay, I'm going to show you this one part.
Now you can go back to doing the rest of the big case, challenge yourself, but do it in a way that's safe because usually it's just one or two parts of a case. That's really where you just, I can't see what's behind this wall. I can't get over this one hill. If I could just see the next step, I'd be fine. It's usually one or two steps, but with each case you do, you go, okay, now I know how to do this part. Now I know how to do that part. Next time I'll put the camera a little bit higher. Next time I'll put my ports a little bit higher for those reasons. I think just be patient and really allow yourself the opportunity to try to figure these things out.
The only other thing with the big giant cases is once you make your anterior colpotomy because they're so heavy, you can't use the VCare to lift up the uterus as much. Sometimes the cervix sits on the bowel and getting a colpotomy posteriorly is pretty challenging. That's when I'll use, that's like the only a few times I use a tenaculum and I'll grab the cervix and just lift it up. I'll actually take the manipulator out at that point. Now you've just got a band to posterior vagina. You can just run across safely up off the bowel because sometimes the VCare can actually limit you. It's sort of holding things down.
If you get stuck, you've already defined your anatomy, gotten your uterines, and you're just trying to get the vaginal cuff taken care of, that's a good time to take your manipulator out. It may not be helping you that much. It may actually be hindering you a little bit.
[Dr. Amy Park]
How do you morcellate?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Applied bag. There's a tissue morcellation bag. The bigger one, 17 centimeters across. The biggest uterus I've fit in there is 2,500 grams. Pretty big. That's as big as most anybody will do. I've had conversations with patients like, look, if it's bigger than that, we have to have a conversation. Are we going to make a laparotomy and taking it out one piece? Are we going to morcel it without contained morcellation? That's, I think, it's a reasonable discussion to have with patients and explain the data.
There may be occult malignancy. It's unlikely, but give them the opportunity because in that Michigan paper years ago, actually one of our former residents wrote, based on doing away with mechanical morcellator, more women are being injured from just laparotomy. If you did all those ones open, there'd be more people that have injury complications from that than leiomyosarcoma, which is a terrible disease, but it's also thankfully quite rare.
Just having an informed conversation with patients, letting them know what their options are, and the 6-kilo uterus, there's no bag for that. That was a conversation with a patient who sought me out, really wanted me to try. I was like, look, I don't think we should probably do, I think this is something that we have to be honest about what we think we can do and I'm willing to try. I'm not going to do anything unsafe. If I feel there's ever a point in the case where I don't feel like we can safely see what we need to see, we'll open and that's fine. Again, it was all fundal pathology. Once you get the upper pedicles, it looked like a regular hysterectomy. It was just 40 weeks size. There's no bag for that. Yes, in general, we do, but if we can't, we'll have an informed discussion with patients.
[Dr. Amy Park]
You do contain morcellation with the morcellator in the bag.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
You can do that through a fan steel or do it vaginally.
[Dr. Amy Park]
Yes, I was going to say there's different morcellation techniques. You can bag it and do vaginal morcellation. You can bag it and just do sharp with a scalpel. You can bag it and use a--
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I usually use scissors and we've got some long curved Mayos that are nice. The longer scissors, actually, it's much less effort, the longer lever, because chopping up fibroids and stuff. I did a case the other day with a colleague who was sort of like, was going to do a gel point up in the upper abdomen with the robots. Let's just, let's try to use all eights up here. I think we can get it out from below. Afterwards I actually left when she was morcellating and I set her up and came back and she was done in 20 minutes on a 1-kilo uterus, that was a pretty tough 1-kilo uterus, tons of prior surgeries, and things like that.
The newer ones have a firm plastic sort of like a cylinder you put in and you put an Alexis inside that and it really opens things up and keeps all the anatomy really well retracted in a way that allows you to see pretty well, even for big pathology. I think vaginal morcellation in bag is something that's actually, they've developed a pretty nice system applied did for their morcellation bags.
[Dr. Amy Park]
That's pretty awesome. I know I've kept you for a long time, but I love picking your brain and hearing the tips and tricks. I always like to say, once you know the steps of surgery, it's really just a series of tips and tricks.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
That's it. It's little bits. Each time you do one, you go, okay, that was interesting. I'll do it that way next time. That's again, same thing last time when you and I got to chat about vaginal surgery, it's like, I have to see it from the other side. I have to understand how you get to my version of that. Yes, that was a blast talking to you last time. It was fun to do this today.
[Dr. Amy Park]
I think the other thing that I'll just caution people when you're listening to this, it's like, you have to have a constant analysis of all the steps like you're talking about and where the pitfalls and just be really analytical, not just of complications, which are obvious, but things that didn't go well in the case, and try and analyze what you can do better all the time. That is one of the keys to becoming a better surgeon.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Know your limitations. That was something I think I got a lot of grief when I first started out. I got some good advice from senior partners like, don't be a cowboy. Patients are not to be experimented on, right? We need to understand our own limitations and we need to ask for help. There's no pride here. This is about patient outcomes. This is about patients doing well. Ask for help. If you don't have the person nearby that can help you do this tough case, then it's probably time for that tough case to be an easier case if it's open for you or whatever. Making sure you do a good pre-op workup and know who's going to be there that day or know what partner you might need to call in. We've got to be safe. It's amazing to have mentors and have sessions like this where we can sort of help each other figure out how to do some tougher cases. Ultimately, there are safe ways to advance your practice. Make sure folks are doing that for sure.
Thank you so much for listening. If you haven't already, make sure to follow the podcast, rate it five stars, and share with a friend. If you have any questions or comments, direct message us at _backtableobgyn on Instagram, Twitter, or LinkedIn.
Podcast Contributors
Dr. Mark Hoffman
Dr. Mark Hoffman is a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon at the University of Kentucky.
Dr. Amy Park
Dr. Amy Park is the Section Head of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery at the Cleveland Clinic, and a co-host of the BackTable OBGYN Podcast.
Cite This Podcast
BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2023, October 12). Ep. 36 – Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Tips & Tricks [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com
Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.