BackTable / OBGYN / Podcast / Transcript #41
Podcast Transcript: Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Tips & Tricks
with Dr. Sarah Cohen Rassier
In this episode of BackTable OBGYN, Dr. Mark Hoffman is joined by Dr. Sarah Rassier, a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon and Director of the Fibroid Clinic at Mayo Clinic, to discuss the multiple treatment modalities of fibroids with a focus on laparoscopic myomectomy. You can read the full transcript below and listen to this episode here on BackTable.com.
Table of Contents
(1) Fibroid Treatment Options
(2) Myomectomy Patient Candidacy: Prioritizing Patient-Centered Decision-Making
(3) Myomectomy Work Up: MRI & 3D Mapping
(4) Robotic vs. Traditional Laparoscopy in Myomectomies
(5) How Many Fibroids is Too Many Fibroids for Myomectomy?
(6) Optimizing Myomectomy Outcomes
(7) Umbilicus vs. Suprapbic Incisions
(8) Myomectomy: C-Sections & Closures
(9) Managing Bleeding in Myomectomy
(10) Utilizing Lupron in Myomectomy
Listen While You Read
Follow:
Subscribe:
Sign Up:
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Hello, everyone, and welcome to the BackTable OBGYN Podcast, your source for all things obstetrics and gynecology. You can find all previous episodes of our podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and on BackTable.com. Welcome back to another episode of BackTable OBGYN. This is your host, Mark Hoffman, and I've got on the show tonight a good friend and another incredible guest, Dr. Sarah Rassier. She is a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon and director of the Fibroid Clinic at Mayo Clinic Rochester, and she's also the chair of the Division of Gynecology. Sarah, welcome to the show.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Thank you so much. I'm so honored that you invited me.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Oh, come on now. You're big time. We're lucky to get you. Are you going to be in Nashville in a couple of weeks?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes, hopefully. It'll be great to see everybody.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes, it's a great meeting and I learn a lot, but also seeing our friends is the reason why I go to most of these things or the main reason, obviously. I like to do all my important academic things, of course.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
It always sounds a little bit cheesy, but I feel like it re-energizes me for doing things like education and research when you see what all sorts of cool things everyone else is up to.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I leave with a million ideas. It's just the rest of the year I need to maintain that energy and excitement and enthusiasm, but absolutely. We all deal with these problems throughout the year and then you sit down and chat with someone. Either they're dealing with similar things that make you feel better or they've solved this problem and you go, "Oh, okay, great. Now I know how to deal with it." As much as anything else, I feel like it's catching up with all our buddies and hanging out and learning about their families and all the new exciting things in their lives, but also just trying to figure out how to do all this stuff that we're doing.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Exactly.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
We like to start all our shows similarly by just having our guests just talk a little bit about themselves. Tell us how you got to where you are and how you got to be doing what you're currently doing.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I have been at Mayo Clinic for about three years now. I was lucky enough to come right before the COVID pandemic. That was a fun transition. Previously, I had done all my training and lived on the East Coast. It was a little bit of a funny transition to being a Minnesotan, but I finally feel like I've come through the transition and I'm happy to be a Minnesotan and enjoying the winters, dare I say it. That's been the most recent change. I think one of the main things that drew me here was just the ability to focus on fibroids, both clinically and in my research. I've really loved developing that more specialized niche within our field.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I know that you have a fantastic group up there and being able to find your niche at a place is a nice thing to be able to do. I know in my division, it's just me and a partner and we have to do a lot. Having a partner like Tani, who does a lot of endometriosis, and Dr. Green, who we had on the show, who focuses on a lot of pelvic pain stuff, having everybody able to have their niche allows you to focus on the things that are most interesting.
I have to be honest, I think fibroids are the thing that I enjoy the most about what we do. I think endometriosis is fascinating and it's tough and there's a lot to learn, but I just always found fibroids to be the thing that were the most rewarding cases, the most satisfying cases.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I agree.
(1) Fibroid Treatment Options
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
What percentage of your practice now is fibroids?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I would say probably 80%. I still do a little bit of general MIGs and even a little bit of just general gynecology because we actually don't have general gynecologists at Mayo Clinic, which is an interesting setup. I love fibroids. I could go on about them all day, but I think it is really gratifying because in most cases, you feel like the patient will feel, if not instantly better, better within pretty shortly after surgery. I think that's just one of the things I love is the ability to make an impact.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I think I share that sentiment exactly. Whether it's a hysterectomy, myomectomy, or some of the other treatments we've got, which I'll ask you about later too, but they're common. Folks suffer with them all the time. It's nice to be able to say, "Okay, we can take care of this." With your program, obviously, myomectomies, and that's why you're here, hysterectomies, are you guys using any other treatment options, any other procedural treatment options for fibroids?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. I don't want to be too much of an advertisement for our program with this, but we're really proud to offer every possible treatment option. That's one thing that I felt really strongly about was offering all the possible things, whether it's medical interventions for shrinking fibroids with our radiology colleagues or the radiofrequency treatments, as well as complex surgical options.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes. We're just getting Sonata here. Are you guys using Sonata, Acessa, or both?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. We use both. Initially, I think when I was coming on to using radiofrequency, I had a harder time picturing where Acessa or a laparoscopic approach would fit into my practice. I thought, well, if you're going to go through general anesthesia and have some incisions for laparoscopy, why don't you just take the fibroid out, especially if you're comfortable with myomectomies and suturing?
I find that there are some patients who really want a less invasive procedure, something that's quicker, with a quicker recovery time of probably a week or two, less risk of blood loss or transfusion, or just shorter surgeries in general. I think there are some select patients who really do gravitate towards laparoscopic radiofrequency. For me, the Sonata or the transcervical radiofrequency is really amazing. I feel like that just gives you such an opportunity for great results with a very low recovery time.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
It seems like a game-changer. We're just going to be starting that pretty soon. I think those of us who operate on and manage patients with fibroids, those fibroids were like, "They're there, I can see them. You're having some bleeding, probably pretty well medically managed for now." They come back in two or three years and now they're six or seven centimeters or they've got three or four or five of them. It's like, "Man, we could have zapped this thing when it was little and kept it small with no myometrial disruption."
I know the pregnancy data is there. It's limited, but it's pretty good. I don't think of myomectomies as being a traumatic uterine muscle either. I'm very, very curious about the pregnancy data with RF ablation of fibroids too. I think it's going to be very interesting.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. I think that's really where the future is going for us. I sort of suspect that down the road in 50 years or however long, people will think like, "Oh, my gosh, that was so barbaric what they used to do," with the major procedures that we're doing for myomectomies. Especially if we could identify fibroids when they're smaller, even asymptomatic fibroids and potentially stun them and stall them in place, so they don't keep growing, yes. I think that would be amazing.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I think that's going to be the big leap because doing procedures on asymptomatic patients, it's not risk-free, but when I was a resident and I saw a bunch of open myomectomies, one of my attendings used to take a needle without a suture on it, would stick it and do it like these little small fibroids, little pedunculated fibroids and would put the Bovie on it, basically cooking these fibroids when they're real little to prevent them from getting bigger.
In hindsight, that's what we're doing now. To do it transcervically and have no incisions and have it be coagulative necrosis without the pain of ischemic necrosis, I do think that's going to be something thatI'm optimistic about. I'm really glad to hear you're having that experience up in Minnesota because to me, there's those you want, do I want to do a myomectomy when I know there's a chance I may do a second one in four or five years? Those are not a great case, the second myomectomy. I'm excited about it. I'm hoping it does what I'm reading that it does.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes, definitely. I think I'm finding the place for Acessa or laparoscopic radiofrequency in my practice is tending to be people where their myomectomy would not be easy. It's sort of a complex fibroid, maybe it's a cervical fibroid location or something that's going to be a more challenging case. Not that it's impossible, but when I'm counseling them about the risks and benefits, I'm thinking, "Okay, well, maybe do we want to just get some volume reduction," especially if it's mainly bulk symptoms for them. I think it really does help with that quite a bit.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Interesting. Yes. I guess I think about that when I counsel patients about UFE because I'm really proud of our fibroid program with radiology. They come to our clinic. It's been a really nice program for our patients, very patient-centered. I tell them, we don't need to make them go away. You were fine and asymptomatic up until about whatever, six months, two years ago. This is a time machine. This is going to bring these fibroids back a few years to when they weren't causing you trouble, and hopefully, they won't grow.
If that's our goal and avoiding a major abdominal surgery, then I think that's an important goal. I guess what I'll find out when we're doing the transcervical approach is which ones we cannot address through that approach and where the laparoscopic approach may be a benefit. That's interesting. I've been watching both for a long time, but this is the first one where I was like, "All right, I think we need this." I'll let you know we end up learning from our cases here.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Definitely.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
We've talked a little bit about how you manage fibroids. Tell us about the patients who decide on myomectomy or for whom you recommend myomectomy.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I think this is one area where my practice has really evolved over time. I think when we're in medical training, we have this paternalistic way of counseling patients like, "Okay, here's the procedure you need." For most of us, myomectomy was sort of the no-brainer procedure for people that had symptomatic fibroids who wanted uterine conservation.
(2) Myomectomy Patient Candidacy: Prioritizing Patient-Centered Decision-Making
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I feel like I have shifted into more of a patient-centered decision-making where we really try to share the decision making and you go through all the pros and cons because there really are so many options now that it can be overwhelming. I think patients sometimes still try to push me in terms of like, "Well, what would you do if it were you?"
I tend to reply with anecdotes where it's sort of like, "Well, if you're the kind of person who really prioritizes recovery time, getting back to work, getting back to working out, maybe you want one of these non-invasive or interventional shrinking procedures. If you really want to do something that's more aggressive, definitive, lower risk of recurrence, then here's where we're thinking," and try to counsel people that way. I've also noticed lately that even if fertility is not a priority, a lot of patients are really interested in uterine conservation. Even when we're in the mid to late 40s, perimenopausal timeframe, I'm seeing a lot more myomectomy patients in that group too.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
It's funny you say that. A lot of my practice has shifted that way too, whether it's sterilization and things like that, or before it was like, "Oh," the counseling we would get from some of our senior attendings is like, "Well, they're too young," or whatever. Listen, I trust adults to make decisions for themselves. I trust that when we provide them with, to the best of our ability, the counseling that could help them make that decision, that when they make a decision, we feel like we have to trust our patients.
I think that when it comes to fibroid management, it's like a buffet. "Here's what we got. Here's what can be expected for this particular treatment or that treatment." I think that's what's allowed our program to be successful as patients get choices. I noticed that in fellowship when they had an alternative to hysterectomy that ended up being probably their busiest hysterectomy clinic because patients felt like, "Well, at least you gave me a choice. Ultimately, I decided on the hysterectomy, but I wasn't told hysterectomy was my only option. I realized what the options were."
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Exactly.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
"I decided on it myself," which is a very different place for anyone to be about their own care. To be able to offer them everything, go, "Okay, this is what I want." When I started the program with radiology, people thought I was nuts. Why would you give away a hysterectomy? I'm like, "That uterus doesn't belong to me, first of all. If you're worried about that, maybe we're in a different business here."
Of course, what happens is you build the program, patients come to see you, and some of them ultimately decide on surgery, whether it's myomectomy or all these options we're talking about. Then they tell their friends, "Oh, they have everything there." I think it becomes a great way to build a practice. It's been interesting. I think that transition of giving patients options and educating them as opposed to like, "Here's what you need." It still happens out there for sure. I do think that's a really nice patient-centered approach. I would expect nothing less from Mayo.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. I always say if we're doing a really good job, we're going to eventually put ourselves out of business because the goal should be to get things that are less invasive and potentially non-surgical. One of my biggest soapboxes is that hysterectomy should not be the knee-jerk reaction for anyone that's done with childbearing or not interested in fertility because there are a lot more consequences that we're learning about for potentially comorbidities that occur over time, even if you keep your ovaries in. I'm a big believer in offering, when appropriate, uterine-sparing procedures.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
That was literally one of the senior attendings. Actually, this is a guy who retired and trained all the people that trained me in residency. He used to come back to Grand Rounds. He would say, "After you're done having kids, the uterus is a useless organ. It should just come out." I was like, "Well, luckily, we've learned a few things since then."
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes.
(3) Myomectomy Work Up: MRI & 3D Mapping
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
For myomectomy, it sounds like, again, providing patients options, whether it's patients who want uterine preservation for pregnancy or whether it's because they just don't want a hysterectomy. Then what about your workup? When they come to see you in clinic, they have fibers, they want surgical treatment, how do you evaluate patients? What's your clinic workup?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I think we're pretty spoiled in terms of working with our MR radiology team here. We have a really excellent GYN radiology group. We do get a lot of MRIs. We try to be thoughtful about not overordering it on everybody. I will say, unless it's a really simple-looking myomectomy, I typically will get some MRI imaging for people just for surgical planning. Oftentimes, especially if they're considering various options, that's helpful to tell them if they're a good candidate for embolization or focused ultrasound or things like that.
I usually have an MRI with some pretty awesome imaging. We use vaginal gel, which is really helpful too. I feel like that's not something I see in a lot of outside facilities, but that really helps with delineation, especially cervical or lower uterine segment fibroids. That helps me with counseling too about the route of surgery. Also for me just planning out, what am I thinking? Do I want to try to shrink this uterus ahead of time? Where will my ports be? Will I need to do a mini-laparotomy? What will the positioning look like?
I'm pretty heavy on the imaging in addition to the exam too, feeling the width and mobility of the uterus as well as just the overall fundal height. Everyone's torso is a little different. How much room do they have between the fundus and the costal margin? Is it realistic to do a purely scope case or what are we trying to think outside the box here? Things like that.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I have a very similar approach, MRI, and we're lucky to be where we are, I think because you have done some 3D modeling and printing and those kinds of things. I remember, and anyone who wants to learn about fibroids just needs to look up Dr. Rassier or Dr. Cohen. There's a lot of her work published.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
There's a ton out there that you've done, which is amazing work. For me, it's that 3D model and it's looking at all three axes back and forth and back and forth. I've got one here. Here's where the uterine arteries are. Here's where IP is. I think this is where the tube is. It looks rotated to me based on where the cavity is. I'm going to have to make my hysterectomy in this direction. Which fibroids can I get out through which incision? Try to have as much of a plan before you make an incision. Yes, I think a lot of it is that 3D mapping in my mind of how we approach it.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes, I totally agree. I think that's something that comes with experience. I find that that's something that the trainees tend to have a little bit harder time with in the beginning until they do more and more of these cases is seeing things in a three-dimensional field, especially if you're a straight stick surgeon where you are working with 2D vision usually.
I sometimes, I think, liken it to sports psychology, how you're running through the game in your head before you actually get on the field. I definitely do that, especially with my challenging cases of running through the steps, how am I going to prepare, and doing most of the planning before you even make an incision.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I've had that exact same conversation with my trainees. It's that visualizing the win kind of thing, like, how am I going to actually achieve this goal? Seeing it in my mind first, it makes it so much easier. Oftentimes when you get in there and actually see the uterus, I don't know if you ever get this feeling, but today we had a case, I had a plan for it. You get in there and you go, "All right, we're done. Okay, big fiber, then put your cul-de-sac, the case is over." I know all the steps, it's any worries of what might be when you see it, you go, "Okay, I can boop, boop, boop, see my views and we're done."
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Exactly.
(4) Robotic vs. Traditional Laparoscopy in Myomectomies
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Myomectomy can be a little trickier because, unlike a hysterectomy, the two major blood supplies or four, depending on who you're asking, the fibers can be anywhere, right? They can be any size, they can be any number. How do you counsel patients on your approach? If we're talking about abdominal, large incision, mini-lap, are you doing any robotics or are you doing only traditional or conventional laparoscopy?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I've started to think that I may need to get a little more into the robotics realm, especially as I'm valuing the ergonomic benefits of not bending over and leaning over long laparoscopic cases, but I definitely trained very straight six-heavy. It's like, if you're a hammer, everything's a nail. I feel very comfortable with just the flexibility that conventional laparoscopy affords me. I really like that.
I think sometimes for the bigger fibroid cases, it's nice to be able to be flexible when you need to start up very high, super umbilically, but then also work down low later. I really don't use robotics hardly at all at the moment, but it's something I keep in mind.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
It's almost like we trained at the same time.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I actually just got back on the robot after seven years, primarily in one aspect to get my residents some more training because they wanted to do more and more of it. A lot of them are doing it when they come out. Myomectomy, I was like, "That's the reason why I got to get back on the robot." Doing all these hysterectomies, all these closures, straight stick. It's cool that I can do it, but my shoulder disagrees at the end of the day.
To be able to do my myomectomies robotically now in fellowship, I did almost all robotics. I had to make that transition on my own because we didn't have a robot where I was operating for most of the first 10 years of my practice, but I've just gotten back on within the last year, and a little bit of a frustrating curve when you first get back on.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes, I know. There is some humility required to switch platforms when you're so good at one option because you're going to inevitably go back a little bit, be a little slower, a little less efficient. Not that we can't do the same steps, but I think that's a hard hurdle to make yourself be slower.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
There were definitely some grumpy Mark moments in the OR. My first few cases in the rep were like, "Just keep going, it's okay." I was like, "I'm never doing another robot again." Again, no complications. This wasn't like the case didn't go well. It's just like, "Oh, we forgot this thing, and let's go grab that thing." It's extra steps. We've become so routine in our processes for the surgeries that we do to change it. It's emotionally challenging. At least it is for me, but no, I think, Amy and I, Amy Park and I've talked a lot about ergonomics. I will say when a cuff closure is one thing. Also, most cuff closures are in the same axis, right?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Right.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
The biggest reason for me with robotics was that the hysterotomy, I might need to make a vertical hysterotomy or at an angle that is not super easy from the direction that I'm working. That's part of the reason why I made the switch. I'm glad I did, but also, like you said, it's nice to be able to offer those through a different approach. Just doing conventional laparoscopy for your MIS cases, but what's your decision tree when it comes to offering a laparoscopic approach versus a mini-lap versus an open case?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I have really transitioned to more hybrid options lately, which I just equate to thinking outside the box. I feel like I really try to push minimally invasive whenever possible, but sometimes if you have super numerous fibroids, lots of little teeny tiny pebbles in the uterus, or just the size where you just don't have enough room to get your visualization and manipulation, sometimes you have to think, "Okay, is this better that it's done open?"
I think one thing I do is I use a lot of Lupron in my practice. Even if it seems like when you first see the patient, you're like, "Ooh, this is not going to be feasible laparoscopically," I'll still give it a try, trying to shrink it a little bit with Lupron and see if we can get some benefit.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
You're doing that for pre-op prep for myomectomies?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes, not for everybody, but just for the extreme cases.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Interesting.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
For example, if the fibroid is 10 to 15 centimeters or bigger, then I'll say, "Okay, let's think about shrinking it." Not for everybody, but I'll offer it to the patient. Or if I really don't even have a hand's breadth of distance between the costal margin and the top of the fibroid, then I think, "Okay, maybe this could get a little smaller and be more feasible." I've been doing a few cases lately, they've been challenging, but they've really been successful with what I call a hybrid approach.
We know we're going to have to do an open approach for whatever reason. Let's say they have 20-plus fibroids in there, but they also have a really big dominant fibroid to where the open would have to be a huge vertical stem to stern incision. To try to make it a smaller, more manageable, potentially a Pfannenstiel or a "large mini-lap", what I'll do is I'll try to treat the dominant fibroids laparoscopically if I can. If there's a handful of bigger fibroids, I try to at least detach those laparoscopically and then make a smaller open incision. Trying to think, "Okay, it's not just MIS versus open," but trying to think, "Okay, even if it is open, can we make it a less invasive approach?"
(5) How Many Fibroids is Too Many Fibroids for Myomectomy?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Less invasive. Yes, exactly. Is there a number of fibroids where you're just like, "This is not a good myomectomy case, there's not going to be much useful uterus left," or is it just counsel, and we'll take a shot?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I think when it's a dozen or more fibroids is where I start to have the gut instinct of like, "Okay, what are we thinking here?" Not only just for, can we feasibly get all the little tiny ones out, but how much time is it going to require in the OR, that kind of a thing. I'll usually offer it to the patient and say, "Okay, I will get as many fibroids as I can laparoscopically. I might get all 20 fibroids, but I may not be able to get all the small ones. Is that okay with you? Or would you say I'd rather have an open procedure with a potentially bigger recovery and then get every last fibroid that I possibly can?"
I also use the mini-laparotomy that we do for tissue extraction as a benefit here too. Sometimes with these cases where it is like, let's say, 15 to 20 fibroids, lots of little tiny ones, I will just make the suprapubic mini-lap, make it a little larger. Maybe five to six centimeters instead of three to four. I can actually exteriorize the uterus after I've taken off the big fibroids. It's like, again, a hybrid. It's mostly laparoscopic, but I'm getting the little teeny ones out, making sure I can palpate and use that to my advantage.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
That's how you do your tissue extraction, is through a mini-lap Pfannenstiel?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Well, potentially umbilicus is my more preferred location for cosmesis, but if it's going to be a larger incision or if I think I can utilize it for the surgery, sometimes if there's a difficult anterior lower uterine segment fibroid, I'll say, "You know what? That'd be easier to suture through a mini-lap than it would be laparoscopically," or thinking if there's a lot of small fibroids that I really want to manually palpate, that's what I would choose to do a suprapubic mini-lap, so I could use it for the surgery too.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I think that it just goes back to your visualization, right? Okay, if I get this one out, how am I going to get this out? All the different steps. I was lucky in residency and fellowship to get a lot of exposure to mini-lap, to doing a lot through just one little Pfannenstiel incision. I think it's like the most powerful, useful incision a gynecologist has. The benefit versus hysterectomy is the uterus moves around, you can bring the uterus up to that incision. Even for a 10-centimeter fibroid, you can move it around underneath the skin. You can get a ton done through those incisions. Is there any limit to the number of fibroids that you'll offer to remove through a midline laparotomy or through a big incision?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
No, I think the highest number I ever counted was 101. That was in a pretty extreme case, lots of little baby fibroids.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Oh, come on.Really?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. I think it does come down to patient selection too. If you have a, let's say, 49-year-old, no desire for any sort of fertility preservation who just wants to have a fibroid procedure and they have innumerable fibroids, probably I'm going to counsel them towards hysterectomy. For these patients that have a really huge fibroid burden, but they want to preserve their uterus, I think that especially with fertility concerns, and that's what I would try to be as aggressive as I can.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Are you just bivalving the uterus and digging them out and trying to close the whole thing? That seems to me to be a worry that I have, is if you're making 30 incisions on the uterus, I don't know that we have that data, but certainly something you worry about in their pregnancy.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Exactly. I would say these are not the most common cases whatsoever. Most of my cases are under 20 fibroids by far, but I have seen the bivalve-ing technique. That's not something I use frequently. When I have that many fibroids, I'm going to want to be extra conscientious about the hysterotomy location to try to get as many as possible through each site because I do worry, how much are you creating a Swiss cheese uterus that's not going to really give you the benefits you're looking for?
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
A hundred fibroids. I think I saw close to 30 or so at one point in residency and I've taken out, I think, 10 laparoscopically, or 10 or 12 is, as many as I feel like is worth doing. Certainly, a straight stick, but 101, that's got to be some kind of record, but not one I'm interested in trying, it's like the six-kilo uterus I took out. I'm not interested in trying to top that record. I have no interest in doing that ever again if I don't have to.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
No, me neither.
(6) Optimizing Myomectomy Outcomes
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
All right. MRI exam we've said is key. Choosing our approach based on all of those things, giving patients options. Let's focus here on a laparoscopic approach for-- we can certainly bring in what you do for all of them, the abdominal ones as well, but patients in the OR, what are we doing to get through this case and get through it safely and optimize our outcomes?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I think the first thing I really focus on is the port placement. Assuming we got the positioning and all that just down pat because I think you can really curse yourself during the case if you don't place your ports correctly. Especially for more challenging cases with bigger pathology, I'll often start with a high leftover quadrant port just to make sure I can get the lay of the land and I don't end up putting my port to places where I'm not as happy. Then like we talked about before, just pre-planning like, "Am I going to need to use the mini-lap for the case, or is it just going to be purely for tissue extraction," and getting all that set up ahead of time?
A couple of other things that I've been using more recently that I didn't use to have these thoughts in my head, I have cell saver or cell salvage machines available if I have one of these crazy cases, which again, it's not that common, but one of these cases where I think there's a high chance of opening or it's a more extreme fibroid number, it's difficult to use with laparoscopy, but you could put it through a mini-laparotomy site and suction out the blood to potentially recycle to the patient. Just thinking ahead, do I want anything more extreme like this?
Another one that's outside of my usual toolbox is the laparoscopic ultrasound. I know a lot of other services may have ultrasounds for kidney surgery or other things, but there's a ultrasound that comes with the laparoscopic radio frequency device that I just-- it's reusable. I just use it for my myomectomy cases as well. Not for all of them, but for the ones where there's a couple of small intramural ones where you can't really visualize it or palpate it that easily with laparoscopy. Sometimes it's nice for those little intramural guys that you want to make sure you don't leave behind, but they otherwise might be a little harder to locate.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Interesting. Those are the ones where I have the MRI pulled up and I'm looking and I go back to the OR, and I'm going to pull it up again and turn around to the patient and go, "I think it's here." Then you dig and you're like, "Oh, thank God, there it is."
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
No, I think that's a really interesting idea to add to. Like you said, they're there, they're not necessarily small, but they're deep and they're intramural and they should come out. That's a really cool idea. Interesting. Does that just go through a 10 or a 12, or what do you put that through?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes, it goes through a 10. That's part of the planning too, as I usually try to operate with all fives unless I have to do a tissue extraction or something like that.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I hate closing laparoscopic ports. It's fives for everything unless I absolutely have to. Basically, the only time I ever really use anything larger than a five is if I'm doing a gel point, I'm using my mini-lap. I started doing my tissue extraction at the end, but then I realized, "Well, I've got a gel point, I can use that the entire time and I can pass sutures through it, I never have to use a big incision."
(7) Umbilicus vs. Suprapbic Incisions
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Talk to me about why you choose belly button or umbilicus versus suprapubic because I personally have gone almost exclusively to suprapubic because I think in terms of cosmetic, I think in terms of healing, I always felt like the hernia rate or at least what I've read is the hernia rates appear to be lower through a Pfannenstiel, mini-lap Pfannenstiel than through a larger umbilical incision. What can you tell us about that?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. I feel like it really is patient-dependent. If someone is obese, has a prior hernia repair, or it seems like they're more prone to hernia, then I definitely want to avoid the umbilicus or sometimes people have sort of like subtle subclinical hernias that you notice on exam now that you're a belly button expert. I definitely avoid it in those cases, but I have some patients that they really would like for cosmesis to avoid any other bigger incisions elsewhere.
I also don't operate using a suprapubic port. It's an additional incision that I wouldn't already be using for my surgery, whereas the umbilicus, I'm just expanding a preexisting incision. I feel like I've to some extent become a belly button plastic surgeon over my career. I really spend a lot of time thinking about how to reconstruct it. You can get a sense of, "Okay, this is going to look really good," or, "This is actually not the best umbilicus for a big incision. That's not going to go well together."
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I definitely feel like I got really good at my suprapubics and my belly button plastic surgery skills maybe are not up to the Sarah Rassier level of expertise. I definitely feel like that's an area for professional and surgical development on my end because I do feel like it's one of those things that-- we have large patients where we are. I know a lot of people have big patients, but I just feel like there's a lot of complaints about the belly button. People are very picky about their belly buttons. We'll definitely add belly button expert to your list of credentials in post to make sure we have that in there as well. I'm assuming that means you're an ipsilateral sower, ipsilateral ports operator.
I was trained that way too, but for my myomectomies, I was using a suprapubic, I was using that Pfannenstiel port. I would just do an ipsilateral, or the diamond rather, not ipsilateral, but the diamond port configuration for myomectomies specifically. I think, yes, it makes sense if you're going to use that umbilical port anyway to do it that way.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. I've been trying to challenge myself to really only do small mini-laps at the umbilicus. If you have a huge pathology where you're like, "Okay, this needs more than a three-centimeter of any lap to be efficient," then I'll go suprapubic for sure. I'd say I'm probably 70/30 on my distribution, so I try to keep it like three, three and a half centimeters at the umbilicus.
You probably do all the same stuff. My tips are that the corona or the ring of the belly button tissue, if you can keep your incision within that to the most degree, it's like an invisible incision at the end. I usually do a vertical incision through the base of the umbilicus, and if I have to go beyond that coronal ring of tissue, I just try to go vertically either superiorly or inferiorly a little bit, and that usually heals pretty nicely.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Are you going directly through the belly button, like you cut it in half, or do you go around the base?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Just vertically, just straight through. Yes, superiorly to inferiorly, just straight through the base. A tip that one of my old colleagues at Brigham taught me was how to tag the fascia to the subdermal umbilical base. Basically, after you closed your fascial incision, you grab a little bite of fascia and then you do a little U-stitch on the base, the absolute densest tissue at the base of the umbilicus, in that little subdermal tissue, and then just mirror it on the other side. Fascia, skin, skin, fascia, and it really brings it down and recreates a nice innie. That's something that I think helps a little bit to hide the incision.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
That's a video that needs to be made, I think, for one of these meetings, so you can show me exactly because it is like 3D reconstruction in that area. I think some people go around the belly button and I've seen other surgeons will do a big crescent or around it. It doesn't look great cosmetically. The ones that go sort of straight through seem to heal and look the best because it mimics one of the natural creases and folds in the belly button. Maybe I'll just have to get more used to that.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. I think I'm the opposite of you in terms of my suprapubics. I feel like I get more complaints about cosmesis in terms of that. I think it's just whatever you get really fast that gets better.
(8) Myomectomy: C-Sections & Closures
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Interesting. I will say for myomectomies though, if they're getting a C-section, I think I have to talk to Tatney about this too, if they're getting a C-section, then they're going to get a Pfannenstiel anyway. Even if it's cosmetically similar, rather if it's cosmetically not as preferable for our patients, they're going to get a bigger one through there anyway. If we're doing it, then that's what I usually counsel to my patients. If they're patients who are trying to get pregnant, then that may be an option. Are you recommending all patients who get a myomectomy undergo C-section for delivery?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. I feel like that's a tricky one that I usually try to weasel out of because I'm luckily not doing any obstetrics.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Ask your obstetrician.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. I do basically tell them that I don't really believe in the whole “if the cavity is breached or not.” Basically, if you have an extensive myomectomy involving significant myometrium, I think you should probably get a C-section or at least be counseled about that. If people have more exophytic fibroids where we're really hardly touching the myometrium and it's just more cirrhosal work, then I'll really encourage them to discuss that with their OB. Maybe that could be something that would be a trial of labor. I think I usually just give them the op notes and say, "Make sure to show your pictures to your OB and explain what happened."
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I knew you were smart. Yes. Unless it's pedunculated, we're digging in there and tearing this thing apart to get it out. I don't mean that literally, but these big internals. If they're large enough to require a myomectomy, for the most part, we're making pretty big incisions or if they're small fibroids, there's usually a bunch of them. Forget if it's in the cavity or not. If I'm making 80% cut deep into the uterine wall, whether the last little bit of endometrium was compromised or not is not why they're having a uterine tear in my mind. I also like to sleep at night. Call me crazy.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Exactly. I don't know where that urban legend about if the cavity is breached or versus not breached came from, but I really don't think that there's much data to support that. I also think if I did obstetrics still, I'd have a 99% C-section rate. I'm probably not the best person to ask.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I think one of our oncologists was a generalist for a year and I think his C-section rate was 80% or something crazy. Watching those tracings is not for the faint of heart. That's something that is why I think you and I are sitting here talking about myomectomies and not C-sections.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I think that when we talk about the 3D modeling and 3D sort of approach to enucleation really was what we're talking about, what instruments do you use? How do you get your fibroids out? Then talk to us about closure.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
For the incision planning, I actually spend quite a lot of time. Sometimes I can be sitting there for several minutes in the OR before I've even made my uterine incision, especially when they're larger or they're close to the corneal structures, just to really make sure that I feel confident that, once you make that incision, if it extends, is it going to extend into the utero-ovarian? Are you going to have enough room to get your huge fibroid out? Like you said, I don't prefer to do vertical incisions because of my suturing position, but do I need to? I spend a lot of time just planning out the incision.
I don't worry too much about getting every single fibroid through one incision as much as just making sure that it's very thoughtful, whatever I'm doing. I like to use the harmonic scalpel again, just because that's how I trained. I think whatever you are most comfortable with, you're probably the best at. I think there's a lot of other tools that are great as well. I like the harmonic because it has a little less thermal spread than some other options. I don't feel quite as bad about the cirrhosal or myometrium that I'm going through. I'll usually make my incision with a harmonic and then try to do some blunt enucleation combined with some sharp dissection if needed.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
It's the one thing I use a harmonic for, not the one thing, but the main thing I use a harmonic for. When I'm doing hysterectomy with large vessels, I want to seal them before I cut them, whereas I feel like for a myomectomy, it's like a perfect device. It cuts, it can help sort of curve and follow the contour of the fibroid. Like you said, it's just enough sealing. We're minimizing all those little bleeders. We're not cooking this thing. I agree. I think it's the ultimate device for a traditional or conventional laparoscopic approach to myomectomy.
(9) Managing Bleeding in Myomectomy
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
One thing I forgot to ask, OR setup and those things, what are you doing to minimize blood loss? I think I actually listened to one of your talks years ago and just totally copied at least what you did then. I'm curious if I need to update my protocol. What are you doing for minimizing blood loss besides obviously surgical approach and technique and those things?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
It probably is not much different than what I would've said years ago. I try to be conscious about anemia optimization ahead of time. I really love using iron infusions. You just get so much of a quicker bounce back on your blood count. I love that along with suppression of menses or Lupron if it's really severe. Then in the OR, I pretty much universally use what I call a pharmacologic tourniquet. I use intravenous tranexamic acid, rectal misoprostol.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
One gram IV of TXA?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes, exactly.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Then I think 800 micrograms or 1,000 micrograms of meso per rectum?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes, I usually use 600, but I think there's some variation of what's been reported for miso, and it's tolerated quite well per rectum. One thing our anesthesia team often asks us is in ortho, they usually repeat the TXA. I usually just give it once at the beginning. Then I'll use a dilute vasopressin during the case too.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
That's exactly what I do because I probably copied a few exactly from your talk. It works great, honestly. The number of times I've had to transfuse, unless someone is severely anemic and some of these myomectomies, you're cutting muscle bleeds, but I think it dramatically reduces little stuff that can build up over a long case.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. I'm thoughtful about whether I want to do any structural hemostasis, like vascular clips of the uterine arteries or tourniquets, but I find that I don't need it too much. I'm sort of one of these, if it's not broken, don't fix it. Sometimes for these extreme cases, this is another one of these "thinking outside the box" things. If I have a suprapubic mini-lap for these huge cases, I might put a tourniquet in through my open incision, just like you would for an open hysterectomy. Make a hole in the broad and put a Penrose strain or something similar as a tourniquet. I don't do that often at all. I'd say that's more for these extreme cases, and same thing with clipping the arteries.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I've obviously gotten to the uterines laparoscopically and visualized them if I had to get them, but the number of times I need to do that for a hysterectomy, one hand. On a myomectomy, I've never felt like that was necessary. I feel like you said, if you do these things and you're thoughtful in your approach and you're relatively efficient in your nucleation and your closure because I think, in residency, we did so many myomectomies that were open, but the tenet was speed.
Be efficient. This thing is going to bleed until we're done. Go, go, go. Just be efficient with your steps. Don't rush, but every second counts. Once you get those layers closed and you've got a hemostasis, mechanically that's going to be the biggest way that you can create hemostasis. I think that other stuff buys you some time, no, that's exactly what I do as well.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I think there are some groups that are really, really great with using uterine artery clipping, like temporary clips. I find that in extreme cases, the anatomy is more challenging for that. I think it does take someone who's quite experienced with that technique. That's an option, but I really don't use it routinely.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes. That's not something I do. We've had them in the room. I'm like, "Oh, this is one. This may be the one." Then it was totally fine. I know I could do it. I'm always curious how many people are doing it because they need to or because they can.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Just routine.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes. It's interesting. I agree. I don't feel like I've needed it.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Your comment about efficiency, that's my number one thing I'm always talking about is from the moment you make your hysterotomy incision until it's closed, it's going to continuously ooze. You want it to ooze because if the myometrium is ablated, it's not going to heal well. Sometimes you can't tell because you're in your little zone and you don't really see, there's actually a pool of blood accumulating by the liver. I think, just consciously looking at the time, making sure you're making forward progress, especially if you have trainees involved, being thoughtful about how that is progressing with the efficiency of the case is really important.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
No, I definitely understand that zone where you just-- what's the term for when you're in that…
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
You're locked in.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Time is, yes, meaningless. You're just working and you go, go, go. Yes, it's been oozing down there that whole time. Okay. Closure and layers, right? Is it always going to be a barbed suture for you?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
For me, I'm pretty much always a barbed suture. If I know that I've gone through the endometrium, I'll usually do a smooth suture for endometrial, over-sewing over the endometrial cavity. I don't know if there's any data. It's just more so that's how I would do it open. I'm trying to replicate it laparoscopically.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I do the exact same thing. I just feel better knowing that whatever's inside is smooth and maybe would reduce the risk of there being intrauterine adhesions.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. I have some colleagues that use barbed, so I'm sure it's fine, but that's just how I do it. I try to think about obliterating the dead space. There's not really a pocket for hematomas to form as much. This is the part that I think is the hardest for people to grasp when they're learning is how to close this huge gaping hysterotomy and make sure that the myometrium really approximates well and that you're-- I equate it to closing a book or closing a clamshell, just getting it to rebuild itself. I do multiple layers with the barbed suture and then a separate cirrhosal closure.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I have the same vision in my mind. It's almost like you have to like to see a building that's fallen down and put it back together one floor at a time. It's without fail when these big ones, you start closing the inner layers, and like, "Is this the one that just never comes together? Is this the one that we, because it looks like it's not going to close." Then with each layer, it's boom. By the end, I say the same thing, "It's looking a little more uterine again." As long as you just close the dead spaces back and forth and back and forth and just put it together like a book, just closing it, you almost have to sort of visualize how it's going to go together. I'm going to have to bring this part here and this part there.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Exactly.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I think that is tough for trainees just to see that.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
There was a study I remember from a while ago that looked at the published cases of uterine rupture after a myomectomy. I remember that one of the key things that was common in all the reported cases was the few number of layers. It's just like one huge layer. I truly try to focus on a multi-layer closure. I describe it to patients as a plastic surgery reconstruction of the uterus. It really is like rebuilding the uterine wall.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
No, I think that's exactly right. I think getting deep enough too, I think make small skin incisions, but make the big enough uterine incision that you can get in, see deeply, if it's an open case, get your finger in there and feel how deep it is, making sure, like you said, you're not leaving any dead spaces because it may look close above and there's a big, giant hematoma forming below.
If you have to expand, extend the hysterotomy to allow yourself to get a deeper closure, I know it's heartbreaking to think about making it bigger, but if it means you get to close it better, it's something we teach for sure.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I also think just, especially for people that are just starting out, it's not the absolute worst thing in the world to open or to create a small mini-lap. If you're not getting an adequate closure, it's not laparoscopic or die. It has to be what's in the patient's best interest. I think thankfully that doesn't happen often, but if you feel like the closure is just not going to be coming together, that'd be an indication for a little bigger incision to make that more optimal.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes. Whether it's you by yourself and you have to just, no cowboys here, right? Do what's best and what's safe. You and I are in places where if I need to call someone to come take a look, whatever, we can. I do think myomectomy is that one of the cases, myomectomy is an endosurgery also, but it's one of those that it's tough to do four years of residency and come out, in my opinion, and feel confident doing and comfortable doing a laparoscopic myomectomy.
There's a lot of moving parts and a lot of technical challenges to those cases that I think it's tough to pick that up in four years. I think that's one of the big things for MIGS fellowships or whatever we're going to call it going forward is getting a lot of touches and a lot of reps on myomectomies because those are the ones that are fun, great cases, but learning can be challenging.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I think sometimes even the fibroids that seem a little bit easier, the exophytic fibroids are either on a pedicle and people might mistakenly think that they're easier, but those can bleed quite a bit.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
They make the mistake of lopping them off at the base, right?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Exactly.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I'm like, "No, no." You have to make a little turtleneck around it, so you have some cirrhosis because otherwise, it'll retract and you'll just have a big ulcer that you'll never stop the bleeding. Yes, those are easy if you do them right. If you do them wrong, boy, well, those are the ones that bleed the worst sometimes.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Exactly.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Tissue extraction, I know we've talked about this endlessly in the last 12 years of our careers, but tell us a little bit about how you get fibroids out.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I'm a huge proponent of contained extraction. I think, in my opinion, everything should be done within a containment bag when feasible. It can be power morcellation if you have it or you want to do that and the patient's amenable to it. I usually do manual extraction with a scalpel, but I have heard a lot of people say, "Well, the cat's already out of the bag. If you're doing a myomectomy, the fibroid has been dissected out. You could be spreading cells through the cavity."
That's definitely true. I explain that to patients that this is not an oncologically sterile procedure. This is going to potentially disseminate some cells from just enucleating the fibroid. I think that the potential for leaving little tissue pieces or leaving little fibroid chunks in there as you're morcellating is really significant. We're seeing more and more cases of these peritoneal fibroids after prior myomectomy or prior hysterectomy. Those are pretty morbid in terms of if you have to go in there and reoperate on them in some cases.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Interesting.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I like the containment bag. I think it doesn't eliminate the risk, but it might minimize the chance of leaving a little fibroid piece behind.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
No question with the mechanical morcellator, we were shooting little pieces of fibroid bits everywhere. I think that we're morcellating by hand as well now. It's the little bits and it just keeps it together. There's a lot of fibroids, putting them in a bag, it's a smart way to do it. Are you using a fishing line at all to keep them?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
If I have a lot of tiny fibroids, I'll do that. Create a string of pearls where I have a suture that's in there. Then as I'm collecting them, I'll just string them up. Or if you already had a mini-lap for the case, let's just say you made your suprapubic mini-lap at the beginning, I'll just take out the smaller fibroids as I go just to avoid losing track of them. That's the worst. You don't want to lose track of it and then spend forever searching for small fibroids.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
30, 45 minutes looking for that one. Make sure you count as you go because otherwise, is there another fibroid? You don't want to find that MRI in six months and realize that you left it there for sure.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I also like to do what I call excessive irrigation. I sort of say I'm in recovery for being an over-irrigator because, at the end of the case, there had been fibroids potentially sitting in the pelvis the whole time. I just try to do several liters of irrigation to ideally try to dilute if there's any residual tissue spill or cellular spillage that's in there.
I think another option is the posterior cul-de-sac is another opportunity for removal that I don't use that often, but there may be some patients whose umbilical or suprapubic is not going to be either a good option or necessary. Potentially, you can take some fibroids out through a posterior colpotomy and the vagina accommodates stretching a little bit nicer too. You can potentially slate that way.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
When I was retraining on the robot, that was funny because the guy was like, "Have you done this before?" I had to watch a surgeon,- he was a really nice guy. He was a good surgeon, and got to watch a guy operating, and he took four or five or six fibers out through a posterior colpotomy, and it looked super smooth the way he did it. I guess I get a little nervous about, number one, any type of vaginal incision, dehiscence, or infection. Also, again, if they're going to get a C-section, this is a patient who we already know they're going to get a C-section. I don't know. I see the value in all of it. I think it's another good option for V-notes, for example. Are you doing V-notes at all?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
We're talking about it. I haven't done any cases, but I think it's interesting for select people, not for every case for sure.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
My partners have done a few. We've done the training and stuff, but that was one of those, I felt like if you could learn that doing the posterior colpotomy for tissue extraction would be very similar and a similar approach that would allow you to get comfortable doing that as well.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I think it's important to talk to the patients too because especially if some of these fibroid patients are young, reproductive age, sexually active, they might not want a vaginal incision that's going to potentially have a little longer pelvic rest, or God forbid, some sort of dyspareunia happens from it. I don't think issues with it are common, but it is important I think to chat with the patient ahead of time and see what their preference would be.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
That's great. I think we've gone over a lot. I think your process is-- you've seen as many of these as anybody. I think your insight is invaluable. Again, the reason why we do this show, if you and I were in Nashville in a few weeks talking about this, I would be talking to you about this because I'm genuinely curious about what you're doing and the fact that we get to do this and now have a few other people listen to it afterwards that I think is awesome. Tell me about what the future for myomectomy looks like in your mind.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I think, like we were talking about, putting ourselves out of business, doing some more preventative work. What is it about any environmental lifestyle risk factors that we could modify? There's some work on vitamin D deficiency. Are there any other substances or supplements people could be taking to decrease their risk of fibroid formation? What can we do to identify them before they're a problem, either using new medications like the GnRH analogues or some of these radiofrequency procedures, something that we can do to stop them before they get to be as big of a problem? I think that would be really, really interesting.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
When I tell people, med students who are picking their profession or their specialty, I'm like, "Imagine whatever that procedure you love to do. Imagine we come up with a pill that makes that procedure obsolete. Would you still like that specialty? If you're curious about the medicine, if you're curious about treating fibroids, being a gynecologic surgeon is fantastic. If you just like myomectomies, think about what 30 years from now looks like because your career will be, a big chunk of that will be long after that stuff can be developed."
I think there's a lot to be said for trying to minimize the number of myomectomies we do. I think these technologies we talked about earlier on this evening are going to be things that hopefully prevent the number of myomectomies, at least certainly the big ones down the road. I am excited about that for sure.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
I think there's a lot of work to be done with just advocacy and patient education, especially in groups like Black women who tend to get fibroids earlier or have more aggressive disease, and just empowering people to really find these things before they become the 15-centimeter that requires a huge surgery.
(10) Utilizing Lupron in Myomectomy
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I had one more question. Lupron. I was always taught in residency, Lupron messes with the fibroids, makes them mushy, hard to nucleate. Sounds like you're using it all the time for myomectomies. I've had a couple that I've done that other providers had given them Lupron. I was like, "Oh, man, this is going to be tough." It wasn't. It was totally fine.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes, I agree. I think there are some cases where the fibroid is degenerated either naturally or from Lupron, where the tissue planes can be a little bit more yucky from degeneration, or if you have like an adenomyoma picture. In general, I don't shy away from Lupron for that reason. I think sometimes if you have a lot of little tiny ones, it can take something from like five millimeters to being almost impossible to find. That's one consideration too.
I use Lupron pretty liberally. I think it'll be nice if we can use something like Elagolix as well, to avoid the flare effect that people have with Lupron. Then potentially, if the patient has an adverse reaction, they can just stop it as opposed to waiting for the injection to wear off. That'll be really interesting too.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Are you using much of the GnRH antagonists?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes, we offer them to a lot of patients. I feel like the financial hurdles are still quite significant.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I feel like that's true with Lupron too, though. Is it easier for you guys to get Lupron where you are than some of these pills?
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
We can usually get Lupron approved for the presurgical indication for fibroids. I think for Elagolix, I've had a really hard time getting that for fibroids. It seems like it's only for endometriosis that people, insurers are willing to do that. We've had a few cases of really difficult parasitic fibroids where they're not operable and thinking, "Okay, can we use these GnRH analogues for trying to manage this?" It's been hard to get insurance approval for anything that's off the traditional indication, but I think it's a good idea for sure.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
So much cool stuff is coming. Yes, it's interesting. All the genetic stuff that we have no idea about, right? All the targeted therapies that we're just totally in the dark about.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes. It's embarrassing, honestly, when patients ask us what causes fibroids, why did I get this? It is the same as endo. It's embarrassing, you have to say. It's been hundreds of years and we don't really know. Here's some possible things, but it's a lot of unanswered questions.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I had the same exact conversation with my patient, it's like, "Sorry. Anyway, here's what we know we can do about it," even though there's certainly an opportunity to learn a whole lot more. It'd be nice if we knew where this stuff came from, so we could, like you said, address the root cause as opposed to just dealing with it at the end of the day.
In the meantime, until those things come along, I think all of us now know a little bit better how to do myomectomies from Sarah Rassier. Thanks so much for being on the show. I know your time is valuable and we are so grateful that you allowed us to pick your brain a little bit this evening. It's so good to see you and I am really looking forward to hanging out in a few weeks.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes, definitely. I think it's so cool that we have such similar practice patterns, even though we trained at different spots. I think great minds think alike. It was really nice chatting with you.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes, it was great. No, because I have the exact same feeling about it, because we had very different training programs, different practices over the last dozen or so years. We've sort of ended up from doing this a long time and seeing a lot of the same things, having a lot of the same sort of practice patterns. It makes me feel a little bit better about what we're doing. Those of you out there that aren't doing it, just do it like we do it and you'll be better off.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
Yes, exactly.
[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Exactly. All right. Great seeing you. We'll see you soon.
[Dr. Sarah Rassier]
You too.
Podcast Contributors
Dr. Sarah Cohen Rassier
Dr. Sarah Cohen Rassier is a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.
Dr. Amy Park
Dr. Amy Park is the Section Head of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery at the Cleveland Clinic, and a co-host of the BackTable OBGYN Podcast.
Dr. Mark Hoffman
Dr. Mark Hoffman is a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon at the University of Kentucky.
Cite This Podcast
BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2023, December 21). Ep. 41 – Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Tips & Tricks [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com
Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.