BackTable / OBGYN / Podcast / Episode #72
Transforming Peer Review: From Punitive to Productive
with Dr. Margaret Mueller
Peer review can be a daunting process as a physician, but there are ways to focus the process on constructive feedback and quality improvement rather than criticism and punishment. In this episode of the BackTable OBGYN Podcast, host Dr. Amy Park welcomes urogynecologist Dr. Maggie Mueller to discuss how we can improve the peer review process in the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
Be part of the conversation. Put your sponsored messaging on this episode. Learn how.
BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2024, November 26). Ep. 72 – Transforming Peer Review: From Punitive to Productive [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com
Stay Up To Date
Follow:
Subscribe:
Sign Up:
Podcast Contributors
Dr. Margaret Mueller
Dr. Margaret (Maggie) Mueller is an associate professor of urogynecology and reconstructive surgery at University of Chicago Medicine.
Dr. Amy Park
Dr. Amy Park is the Section Head of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery at the Cleveland Clinic, and a co-host of the BackTable OBGYN Podcast.
Synopsis
Dr. Mueller delves into her personal involvement in peer review, the challenges faced by providers, and the importance of these processes. Key topics include shifting from a punitive to a quality improvement focus, best practices for peer review committees, the integration of human and system factors, the role of multidisciplinary teams, and transparency. The conversation also highlights the ethical considerations and the impact of peer review on provider well-being, emphasizing the need for structured support systems. Dr. Mueller shares insights into the future trends in peer review, advocating for higher physician involvement and leadership in creating more effective and transparent processes.
Timestamps
00:00 - Introduction
02:21 - Diving into Peer Review
04:14 - The Peer Review Process Explained
07:07 - Challenges and Improvements in Peer Review
13:14 - Changing the Culture Around Peer Review
21:14 - Moving Away from a Punitive Mindset
25:12 - Education to Become a Reviewer
31:39 - Legal Considerations
32:42 - Ethical Considerations
38:31 - Future Trends in Peer Review
41:20 - Closing Remarks
Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.