top of page

BackTable / OBGYN / Podcast / Transcript #76

Podcast Transcript: Clinical Pearls: Managing Endometriosis Post-Hysterectomy

with Dr. Emad Mikhail

There are many challenges when it comes to operating on a post-hysterectomy patient, especially when they have endometriosis. In this episode of BackTable OBGYN, Dr. Emad Mikhail, an associate professor of OBGYN at the University of South Florida, discusses the intricacies of treating endometriosis after a hysterectomy. You can read the full transcript below and listen to this episode here on BackTable.com.

Table of Contents

(1) Hysterectomy & Endometriosis: Myths and Realities

(2) Ovarian Conservation vs. Oophorectomy

(3) Retroperitonealization & Ovarian Suspension

(4) Deep Endometriosis: Evaluation and Imaging

(5)Hysterectomy Challenges Post-Op

(6)Knowing Your Limits, Surgical Judgment & Clinical Decision-Making

(7) Commitment to Endometriosis Care

Listen While You Read

Clinical Pearls: Managing Endometriosis Post-Hysterectomy with Dr. Emad Mikhail on the BackTable OBGYN Podcast)
Ep 76 Clinical Pearls: Managing Endometriosis Post-Hysterectomy with Dr. Emad Mikhail
00:00 / 01:04

Stay Up To Date

Follow:

Subscribe:

Sign Up:

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Welcome back to another episode of BackTable OB-GYN. This is your host, Mark Hoffman, and I've got another good friend and guest coming on the show today, Dr. Emad Mikhail. Emad, how are you?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Hi, Mark. How are you doing?

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I'm good. Thanks for coming on. We appreciate you and it was good to see you in person recently down in New Orleans. That was fun.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
The pleasure is mine. Thank you for having me today.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Our show is, if it's good, it's because we are lucky to have such great guests who take their time to come on. You're no slouch. Dr. Mikhail is Associate Professor of OB-GYN at the University of South Florida, Chief of his Division of Gynecologics and Specialties, and Director of Inpatient Gynecology at Tampa General Hospital. He's going to talk to us today about endometriosis after hysterectomy, which is something that is certainly a challenge for many of us. As we do in every episode, we like for our listeners to get to know our guests. Do us a favor and just tell us a little bit about yourself, your practice, and really how you got to be where you are, because I think one of the things that really made me want to do this was just hearing everybody's path to greatness. It always seems so daunting, and then you hear folks that have done amazing things and realize they shared some interesting ways they got there that aren't necessarily the way we thought. Tell us about yourself, your practice, and how you got to be where you are now.


[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
I came to the US in '08. I finished medical school and I finished the general surgery training in Egypt. Then I came to the US, I moved to Toledo, Ohio for OB-GYN residency at the University of Toledo. It was quite a change in weather and a lot of things, from Cairo to Toledo. Finished my residency, and I wasn't sure what I'm going to do with my life. I was not sure, until one day I went to AGL and I found, oh, this is maybe for me. I applied for MIGS fellowship. I didn't get it the first round, so I didn't match. Then worked as a generalist for a couple of years and re-applied and matched in fellowship. I did fellowship in University of South Florida, and then I stayed on and now I am the Division Director at the University of South Florida.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
That's a great story. It's so many people that I've talked to along the way that are, again, doing great things like you are have had a less than linear path to their success. What was the reason you came from Cairo to Toledo?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
I had a young family and it was very hard for us to see a path of where we want to be if we stayed in the same place. We decided--

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Were you from Cairo?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Yes. I'm from Cairo, born and raised. I say, maybe it is time to move and find an opportunity somewhere else. I applied in the match and I got Toledo.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I'm in Kentucky and I've been to Ann Arbor a couple of different times in my life, so I've driven through Toledo a handful of times or at least driven around it to get up- certainly through it to get to Detroit when I go up there. I think that used to be part of Michigan. There was some war way back when, where I-01–

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
I know.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
The Toledo War, something like that. I don't know. That's not what people are here to listen to. Toledo, and then fellowship in South Florida, and then have stayed on there the whole time. You and I have spoken over the years about practice building and those kinds of things. Because where you were, were the only mixed person for a little while, right? Were you always part of a group? I can't remember.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Definitely. I finished in 2016 and I was the only mixed doc there for seven years. I only hired my partner last year.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
It's a big transition going from one to two, having done that now a couple of times. Congratulations for that. Building things is tough, but it's also- it can be incredibly rewarding.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
It is very rewarding. We're so lucky, since then I hired a mixed partner and then I hired a pediatric adolescent gynecologist, and now we're hiring- thinking of expanding more. It is very exciting time for us.

(1) Hysterectomy & Endometriosis: Myths and Realities

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Wonderful. Having success in building programs comes from building a practice and from excellence in clinical care and surgery. Clearly that's how you've done it. I think when we think about some of the most challenging cases in our MIGS world and GYN surgery, I think of the repeat surgery, right? Once you've gone into a space, operated and come back, that's a big part of how we counsel patients. It's a big part of how we address potential complications is, if we're going to operate, remember if it doesn't provide the results that you want and we have to go back, that next surgery certainly can be very challenging. Before we get into the second surgery, talk to us about the role of hysterectomy and endometriosis. I think it's something that certainly a lot of our patients think about as being curative in that sense. Talk to us about what we understand about hysterectomy as a treatment for endometriosis.
[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Thank you, Mark, for this question. This is a very important topic is that when to do a hysterectomy in patients with endometriosis from the patient perspective as well as from the surgeon perspective. Some patients come and say, if I do a hysterectomy, I'm going to get cured from endometriosis, get cured from pelvic pain, and I'm good to go for life. This is very rarely the case. Actually, hysterectomy, when you think about endometriosis, it is basically an X-ray trial disease because endometriosis of the uterus is actually called adenomyosis. Doing a hysterectomy does not necessarily treat endometriosis. It is a great step to do if you are treating adenomyosis or if you are treating very significant cyclic pelvic pain and dyspareunia.
For endometriosis, hysterectomy usually does not cut it. You have to many things, number one, make sure that you excise endometriosis that's present outside the uterus, and then do a hysterectomy as a complementary treatment in cases that the hysterectomy is indicated. Also make sure that the patient does not have a concomitant- other pain generators that would come as a result of residual symptoms or recurrent symptoms.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
What are examples of other causes?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
You are the expert in this, interstitial cystitis, gastroenterology, myofascial pelvic pain. Those are very commonly occurring consistent symptoms that hysterectomy will not address.

(2) Ovarian Conservation vs. Oophorectomy

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I like that word you chose. It's not something that can be there. It's something that's actually often and more likely to be there along with endometriosis. Those conditions, IC, IBS, musculoskeletal pain are often commonly co-diagnosed. Yes, it's not just that these are other things on your differential. These are things that are more likely to be found even when you do find endometriosis.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Agreed. It's extremely common to have those conditions in patients with endometriosis. On the other side, from the surgeon perspective, it is very hard to go to your surgeon and then the surgeon will tell you, oh, I'm going to remove your uterus, and this will cure all your problems. This is actually- when you think about it, this was the education and the surgery training in gynecology 50 years ago. Do a hysterectomy or actually do an hysterectomy and an ophorectomy and leave all the disease behind and the patient will be okay, which is not the case.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Let's talk about why that's not the case. I think when we talk about hysterectomy, we're talking about uterus and cervix traditionally, but we have to counsel about whether or not to leave the ovaries. Many women who are suffering from endometriosis are of reproductive age, right? Younger, premenopausal, oftentimes remote from menopause. The decision to take out ovaries is not a small decision. Clearly, if they're getting a hysterectomy, they've made the decision that they're not interested in future childbearing, but potential impact on bone, heart, other systems that are not small deals and how we counsel on that. I think historically, the thinking was, make it menopausal, problem solved, right?
They don't have hormones, but that's number one. It's a big decision and we have to think about, is it worth it? Number two, is that going to solve the problem? Talk to us about hysterectomy with BSO, without BSO, as it relates to endometriosis, and what you understand about the likelihood that patients still have symptoms post-op.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
One important point that I have to emphasize is that deep endometriosis nodules secrete their own estrogen as a mechanism of self-survival. Removing the ovaries of the patient and push them into surgical menopause, specifically when the ovaries are normal, not diseased, I believe that this is not the right decision. Removing the ovary as a source of estrogen does not cure the endometriosis. Actually, the endometriosis will still be there, will still profilate, and will still cause symptoms. ACOG, in the last practice bulletin, reports about if the patient is elderly, 60 or older or 65 or older, they can offer them an ophorectomy with potentially no harm. If you have a premenopausal patient, taking out the ovaries has a huge implication on the patient health. If the ovaries are normal, an ophorectomy is not indicated. Excision of endometriosis is the way to go.
One caveat that I have to emphasize is that if you do a lot of pelvic dissection, opening the pelvic spaces, specifically complete peritonectomy of the ovarian fossa or the patient has deep endo and you're treating that and you open all the retroperitoneal spaces and you leave the ovaries, there is a likelihood of the ovaries getting really retroperitonealized. Become underneath the peritoneum. Then this actually by itself causes pain, and if for any reason a repeat surgery is indicated, the surgery becomes significantly harder. Ways to prevent that scarring has to be thought about ovarian suspension, something like that, until the space heals off and the ovary does not become retroperitonealized.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Talk to us about how you do that.

(3) Retroperitonealization & Ovarian Suspension

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
If you end up doing a peritonectomy or open the parietal space specifically and the ovary is normal and you are keeping it, I usually suspend the ovary to the ipsilateral round ligament. It keeps it above the space until the space is retroperitonealized. I know other surgeons who suspend the ovary to the abdominal wall with a temporary stitch that can be removed in two days after. Different ways people are doing to prevent that falling of the ovary into the dissected space, and then it becomes retroperitonealized.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
If you're sewing it to the round ligament, are you using just a Vicryl? Are you using something permanent?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Yes, no, I don't use something permanent. I use absorbent stitch, that I- get absorbed in a week or two. By that time, the peritoneum regrows and the ovaries will not be retroperitonealized.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Now, I think this is one of those areas where we just don't have a lot of data or is there data on that? From the last time I looked, I don't know of any.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
No, actually, there is very scarce data about this, and the main reason is that we cannot do just repeat laparoscopy just to find out if what we did last time worked or not. This is unethical. Any surgical randomized trial will not ever be done, because we cannot do a second look laparoscopy anymore.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Right. It was easier to do that back in the day, I think, but these days we have to be very thoughtful about the surgeries. We talked on the show a bit about the peritonectomies and how aggressive to be, and there's a wide range of opinions on that. I'll probably sit somewhere in the middle. I think there's some value to peritonectomy when you're taking away disease. I think some folks will take away even a normal peritoneum, and sometimes you find little lesions, but at this point, I think we're in more of the expert opinion phase of this. I'm always curious to know what people think about the value of doing wide peritoneal resections when they have visualized or known endometriosis that appears relatively superficial.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
This is a great question. The answer to this, if you ask 10 people, you will get probably 10 different answers. My thoughts, if there is a lot of disease widely dispersed into the peritoneum, like let's say ovarian fascia peritoneum, there is a lot of disease, there is probably skipped lesions elsewhere. Doing a complete-- We call it a butterfly wing peritonectomy. Doing a complete peritonectomy in these cases might be very valuable. If the lesions- you have two lesions very far apart, and the intervening peritoneum is completely normal, you might be doing too much and you will risk having severe scarring afterwards that I'm not sure if actually we're providing a lot of benefit. I think there is a phase of judgment that the surgeon has to employ to see what better serves the goal. One thing I learned throughout the way is that surgical saying that less is more. Not necessarily that you can do the step, the surgical step, you have to do the surgical step.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes. So much of it has to do with the true pathophysiology of the disease, right? If we think it's something that is-- At the cellular level, there's going to be stuff we can't see, right? If we're doing a "complete peritonectomy," we know it spreads, peritoneum grows back, is it going to spread if we're not getting it all? It's hard for me to visualize in my mind how we're "getting it all," right? Because there's going to be peritoneum left on the round ligaments, or the pelvic side walls that are more anterior, the abdominal. We're not taking it all. There's some disease and there's going to be some disease likely on the sigmoid or on the microscopic disease. Whether you think it spreads from there, we're always leaving something behind.
I think that's where understanding how the disease comes about, where it comes from, can really help us understand what we need to be doing. Clearly, some people are benefiting from wider resections. I think it's important to have surgeons who know what they're doing, who understand and feel comfortable in these spaces. It's always something that I just- it's always tough to tell patients, I just don't know. That's the reality of it for most of us.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Actually, in my experience, a lot of patients really appreciate when you say, I am not sure. I'm going to do my best, but I am not sure. Actually, they see this as a sign of confidence, as a sign of experience, not as a sign of being naive. I use this a lot, when I'm not sure, I say I'm not sure. The concept of complete cytoreductive surgery that people adopt from ovarian cancer into endometriosis, again, it is very debatable. Again, this is a benign disease. Complete prosectomy has its own complications. Again, judgment is important.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
No, I think that's a good conversation. I think it's important to tell patients- to be transparent. Look, this is what I believe to be going on. This is what I understand about it. Also to say, I don't know at all. If you want to get another opinion, you're welcome to do that. I do that every day in clinic. I let people know what I feel. We certainly can grade, I feel confidently, I feel really strongly about this. Also I can promise transparency, I can promise honesty, I can promise effort. I can't promise results either. I can't promise outcomes. Let's talk a little bit about, since we got into it a little bit about superficial endometriosis, let's talk about deep endometriosis and the difference between more superficial lesions and deeper lesions.

(4) Deep Endometriosis: Evaluation and Imaging

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
I have a passion towards deep endometriosis. One thing that it is really makes me a lot- have that passion toward the disease is that you probably have less recurrence risk if you do a complete excision. You probably will have a better resolution of symptoms if you do complete excisions compared to superficial endo. If you do the more aggressive surgery in deep endometriosis, you're most likely achieving far better outcomes. That's why I think this way about deep endometriosis. Definitely the surgery is very hard. Definitely if you tackle deep endometriosis after hysterectomy, it becomes way harder. Sometimes when we do a hysterectomy, sometimes we miss disease, or sometimes we don't dissect enough to find the deep disease, or sometimes we do not do the proper preoperative workup to know that there is deep disease that needs to be addressed during the hysterectomy.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
How do you evaluate for deep disease? What's your workup?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
First thing is I listen to your show, and I remember your conversation with Dr. Ted Lee about the value of history taking. I still remember that. I cannot emphasize this very well that how much you listen to the symptoms and try to think about which symptom can be translated in what anatomical location. By listening to the patient, you almost are painting a mental model of the anatomy, where is the location of the disease. Then you can- examination, this is something that we all have been trained during our training about, but utilizing expert imaging, and I cannot emphasize this enough, ultrasounds are not created equal. MRIs are not created equal. If you are a GYN surgeon who decides that you're going to treat patients with deep endometriosis, you have to have access to expert imaging. Either you learn how to do ultrasound for endometriosis yourself or you have a partner or somebody you can access who knows how to do, deep endometriosis ultrasound examinations, and you have also a radiologist who is trained and is interested to develop MRI experience in deep endometriosis.
We have great radiologists, but some of them, they really want to excel in imaging of endometriosis and some not so much, which is okay. But if you are going to tackle deep disease, you have to have those two team members, an expert sonologist and an expert radiologist.


[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Do you read your own ultrasounds?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
I have a partner who is a GYN sonologist and she does all my ultrasounds.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
That's great.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
She does deep endometriosis ultrasounds. Actually, I ask myself every time, do I really need to get an MRI after her scan?

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Oh, wow.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Well, sometimes we still do.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Then you have, I'm assuming, a close relationship with your radiologists and do you have a special pre procedure set up that you do?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
We actually have a multi-disciplinary team meeting for pre-op and post op patients. In this meeting we have mixed surgeons. We have RDI specialists, we have the GYN sonologists, we have the radiologists who are the team who are interested in endometriosis imaging. We have our colorectal surgeon. We do this, maybe, every other month and then we go over cases and for surgical planning. Actually, we come back and present the cases post operatively, showing them the laparoscopy or the robotic images. Actually, everybody learns. We learn together and get better together.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
No, I think that's wonderful. It's nice that your organization, at least your colleagues are supportive of this, because it is- Medicine is a team sport. I've been reading ultrasounds for 12 plus years now, plus fellowship and residency on top of that. I looked at countless MRIs, but having folks who do it and are focused on and are experts in ways that I won't ever be, it's really nice to have those people. We're lucky, where I am, that we only had [unintelligible 00:23:19] Wendaline VanBuren and Dr. Tatnai Burnett on recently and we talked about that relationship and the value and that partnership and using MRI to find those lesions. I personally use a lot of MRI when I have concerns, primarily if there's bowel symptoms. I think if it's not bowel-related, I feel pretty comfortable. On the bladder, I feel pretty comfortable. The adnexa, and certainly I can operate on the bowel, but if you're operating on the bowel and you have colorectal surgeons in your department operating next door, you got to be pretty careful about operating on, in a sense, somebody else's organ, right?
If you have a complication and you had that expert next door, you have to be asking yourself, why would you not ask for their help? Luckily, I've got some pretty not just talented, but thoughtful and hardworking colorectal surgeons who actually care about endo, which is which is pretty rare and unique, too. Being nice to your friends and your colleagues in the OR, ultimately it can end in great patient care. Using MRI, and we've gone through this a little bit, but some symptoms that make you think more about deep infiltrating endometriosis. What are some of the red flags for you in taking history or doing an exam that make you think, man, I probably ought to get an MRI.

(5)Hysterectomy Challenges Post-Op

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Again, listening to the symptoms, and I want to focus about the post hysterectomy patients, because this is the topic with our discussion today. Patients who had a hysterectomy and then they come with significant pain, they have cyclic vaginal bleeding after hysterectomy. This is not normal. This actually raises the flag quite a bit for deep endometriosis of the vaginal cuff, and I've seen quite a bit of this. You do an exam and there is a nodularity in the cuff [unintelligible 00:25:10] as if there is still a cervix. You feel that nodularity, very hard nodule at the vaginal cuff and the patient has total hysterectomy. Sometimes you are lucky when you do a spec lab examination, you show a bluish discoloration of the vaginal cuff. It gives you the clue already, but this is rare. Usually you look at it and you don't see much because it is deeper. In those patients, for example, you're imaging, you do the ultrasound, the special ultrasound, you do the MRI with dye. I have a certain protocol for MRI. Do a vaginal dye and a rectal dye, and then you start to see those lesions.
One of the other things is that bladder endometriosis after hysterectomy. Patients come and tells you that before surgery, I never get to have a history of recurrent UTIs. Now I have significant recurrent UTIs for years, and then I have hematuria. This is not normal. You start to think, okay, maybe there was bladder endo that it was left behind. Actually, the bladder endo, it is so easy because you don't do a lot of homework. Actually they come from the urology. The patient goes to the urologist, hematuria, either cyclic or non-cyclic. They get a cystoscopy, the urology gets a biopsy, and the urologist is like, he done the homework for you. He give it to you on a plate, this is a bladder endo and you have to manage. Same thing for bowel, like erectile bleeding or severe dyskinesia that has a trend or a pattern. This is also not normal. The patient's symptoms, as we talked, give you the clues.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
No, I think those are the- we talked about it before, but listening to your patients, understanding and also knowing to ask the right questions, right? Bleeding per rectum or bleeding in your urine, certainly, go see colorectal, go see urologist. Is it cyclic? Is it something that comes and goes? Those are clues. Certainly, if you have your ovaries, it makes it more likely that they would be cyclic, but you can also get deep and infiltrating endometriosis. It's not in the bladder or in the bowel if it's not transmural. How do you how do you- what are the signs, what are the clues to finding a deep endometriosis that's not in one of those organ spaces?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
The most common locations that we have seen is vaginal cuff, colorectal, bladder, abdominal wall, and then parametrium. Parametrium is less frequent, but still, people can have parametrial disease, and this is the hardest one out of all for many reasons. Number one reason is that there is no specific symptom for the parametrial deep endo. Bladder deep endo, there is a specific symptom, hematuria, cyclic UTIs. For vaginal, post-hysterectomy, cyclic vaginal bleeding, specific symptom. Cyclic dyskenesia or rectal bleeding, specific symptom for colon and rectal deep endo. But parametrial deep endo, it does not have a specific symptoms except of pain. You have to do more workup, and it is harder. I think it is the hardest place to visualize, even if you have an expert ultrasonographer, showing the parametrial is the hardest. I would say, 100% of the time. Patients with parametrial disease, they will need an MRI.
Again, not everybody can read those MRIs because think about post hysterectomy, there's a lot of scar tissue. Actually, in imaging for ultrasound and for MRI, we look for organs that we are familiar and then we build the image around it. We start by looking for the uterus, right? The first thing you do when you do a transvaginal ultrasound is that you find your uterus and then you look around the uterus. Post hysterectomy, there is no that defining organ that you can start your scan with. You lose your pivot point that you relate to. Then you start to find out other nodularity and other locations. Definitely parametrial is the hardest. Another easy one that the patient gives you the answer for is abdominal wall mass. They come and they take your hand and put your hand on the nodule and say, this is it.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
You're talking about primarily post-Caesarean scar abdominal wall endometriums?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
The vast majority are post-C-section, but I've seen patients with abdominal wall endo without C-sections.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Really?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Again, this is rare. I've seen it in location that was no incision in the past, but most commonly after a laparoscopic site. I believe that usually there is some sort of an endometrioma. One thing I really want to emphasize, if you are doing a repeat surgery of any sort, you have to get the operative note. You have to read the previous surgery operative note in any--

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
If you can get it.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Yes. You have to read the previous surgery note, because most of the common reasons why people have laparoscopic port site deep endometriotic nodules is an uncontained retrieval of an endometrioma. They get to do an endometrioma and they just pull it through the skin. Those patients come with implantation that forms a nodule in the port site. But you are 100% right. The majority comes after Caesarean section.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Yes, we see quite a bit of those and those are fun cases. Again, working with your general surgery colleagues, folks that are good at taking care of hernias in case you have to take a bit of fascia out. We've talked about the evaluation, the workup. Surgery is really where I think a lot of us get nervous in going back and operating on someone who's had a hysterectomy. Talk to us about some of the challenges, how you approach a surgery if you find deep and inflitrating endometriosis somewhere, post hysterectomy, assuming post BSO as well, or it doesn't really matter either-or. But talk to me about how you approach those lesions, whether it's bladder, bowel, or parametrial. Rectovaginal is really where I think of the most in those spaces, post hysterectomy, but talk to me about your sort of surgical approach. Are you doing mostly straight stick, robotic combination?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
I was doing a ton of conventional laparoscopy, and then I became more and more and more robotic prone. Now I am- maybe 70% of those cases, I'm doing it robotically.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Did you train robot primarily or primarily straight stick?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Primarily straight stick. I did the transition because I have seen- specifically because I do a lot of cases with a multi-disciplinary team. I have the reconstructive urologist, who when he hears that I'm doing a conventional laparoscopy case, he becomes really not happy.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Urologists do not like straight stick laparoscopy at all.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Indeed. Colorectal, we have a big division of colorectal surgery and they are very competent both ways, so they don't care as much. I personally becoming- really seeing the value of robotics, specifically in those redo surgeries, because the visualization is so much better. You can see the planes so much better, taking into account that the planes are probably gone. One other clue is that you have to see who was the surgeon before you. If it was an oncologist, you have to be very, very careful because that all the spaces are opened and you have to be very careful. If it is a mixed surgeon who does a lot of endo, you also have to be careful because they do the same approach.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Those spaces, the retroperitoneal spaces, have been opened and they are no longer, as one of my [unintelligible 00:33:57] oncologists, Diane Yamada, used to say, the safe port in the storm. Are no longer those places where you can go, ah, now I can see what I want to see because they've been opened, they've reperitonealized in ways that is going to look very different.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
I 100% agree. You know what I tell myself in every single case? Do not expect to find the organs in the way you expect to find them. That ureter that you think is sitting in the ovarian fossa going lateral becomes suddenly so medially pulled into the mesentery of the rectus sigmoid colon. How? Because of the previous dissection. Sometimes if people open really lateral spaces, I found cases where the external iliac vessels are pulled medially into the endometrioma. It really depends on who did the surgery and what spaces have they opened. The more spaces they dissected, the more surprises you will see.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
They are the toughest cases. I think those of us who do it a lot know, when we counsel patients about these surgeries, why you don't want to just go in, oh, we can just go back in a few months. If we're going to do this, let's make sure the surgery is one that provides an outcome because the second, third, and fourth surgeries, and I'm sure you see that. I see it a lot where I am. I'm usually the third or fourth surgery in line. You go, man, that would be nice if we were called first, but it can be challenging. But yes, when you go into those spaces, oftentimes they have been opened up, they have been altered. Those are the toughest surgeries, I think, that we- some of the toughest surgeries that we do when you add in that- and the endometriosis plus the distorted surgical anatomy.
Talk about your process. Is it the same thing every time you have ureterolysis? Do you start higher up in the pelvis where it's been undisturbed? Are you just doing- opening everything up first and then going after the lesion? Are you focusing on the lesion, leaving other stuff behind? What's your approach? I know everybody's a little different.

(6)Knowing Your Limits, Surgical Judgment & Clinical Decision-Making

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Yes, I start high, I start at the brim. It is almost the same thing if there is adnexa still there, the adnexa get dissected and it moves out of the way. If I dissect the ureters in all those cases, because the ureter is probably stuck either to the lesion or to the bowel or to the residual adnexa. Freeing off the ovary and freeing off the ureter, this is the start. It's a bowel disease, so I free the bowel. If it's a bladder disease, I free the bladder. You think about it, I use manipulation in all the organs. What is the meaning of that?
I have a vaginal cuff manipulator. It's a post hysterectomy case. You cannot use a uterine manipulator. There is no cervix. You use a vaginal cuff manipulator specifically made for this. You use a rectal probe in all cases. You have to use a rectal probe. Most commonly and easily available is to use an incisor as a rectal probe. For the bladder, in all these cases, I backfill the bladder to see the contour of the bladder. Sometimes I use a fully catheter guide. A guide inside the fully catheter metals, a guide. Then I push it so I can see the borders of the bladder. For the ureters, I'm becoming a big fan of ICG. Now, in all repeat endo, retrograde ICG, it takes three minutes and you see the ureters so amazingly.
The beauty about this is that, do we need to do ureterolysis in every single case? Probably not. If we don't see the ureter, we have to do ureterolysis because you're going to injure it. If you have ICG and the ureter is very far from the lesion, you don't have to fully strip the ureter and risk its vascularity just because. No, we can actually see the ureter very well. If you don't need to come close to it, don't come close to it. Think about this. In redo surgery, I technically manipulate all organs of somehow. You know whatI mean? Of some sort.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
You're not using stents. ICG for the ureters is enough for you to see what you need to see.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
I used to use lighted stents, which is an indwelling, stays in the whole time during the surgery. It is six French, so it is thicker. Then everybody gets hematuria at least for the first day. Then when I started doing way more robotics, I found the idea about the Firefly and the retrograde ICG. There's no indwelling stent, the ureter just has the ICG injected inside, and the polycatheter.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
How do you get the ICG into the ureter? Just through ureteroscopy or--

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
I use a polycatheter, no cystoscopy, and I put the polyc inside the ureters for very brief moment. I inject and I remove it away, and it stays. Sometimes I have done cases that lasted for eight hours and still you can see the ICG until the last minute. You use a polycatheter inside the ureter, but you just push the dye, remove the catheter, the ureter does not becomes bulky because of the stent inside. It's practice-changing for me.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Wow. There's so many different things that we can do. It just shows the value of doing tons of endometriosis surgery. I've operated a lot in the last 12 years, but there's always somebody doing more. There's always somebody who's thought of things you haven't thought of. That's the beauty of, not just the show, but meetings and keeping in touch with our colleagues who do this, because there's always a way to do it better than we're doing it. You have to be open to the idea that there's-- Even if you're doing great work, there's always that opportunity to think, oh, man, let me think about how I can try something new or better. Not that we all have to change everything all at once, but every one of us has hard cases. When you get into a situation where it's challenging, oh, that idea you had would be really helpful right here.
That's something I haven't done. I've never used retrograde ICGs, so that's really interesting. The idea of using a probe every time, the vaginal cuff manipulator, and the bladder, refilling every single time, really is those extra steps that you think, ah, should I do it? Should I not? If you're doing it every single time, you get used to it, you recognize those visual cues. It really allows you to be a little bit more certain in those areas where there isn't a lot of certainty if you're not really using something to identify those organs.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Yes. After hysterectomy, and think about hysterectomy itself induces scar formation. Endometriosis itself is a scar-forming disease. Dissection that was done, especially if you have done a lot of dissection, all these factors makes the surgery way harder. Actually, you are 100% right, this is the value of discussing with your colleagues. For example, I'm going to tell you something interesting. For abdominal wall endo, for me, that's a really straightforward case. It's a subcutaneous case. You cut on it, you excise it on block. If you cut the fascia, you repair the fascia. If you have a very big fascial defect, you have your hernia friend, he will help you. Done. It's not a big deal. Actually, I just have seen videos lately of people doing laparoscopic removal of the abdominal wall endometriosis.
Actually, we did a course at AGL, and Dr. Ted Lee was one of my co-faculty, and he was showing that you always think about the abdominal wall endometriosis as it is a subcutaneous superficial fascial lesion. There is some cases that it is a subperitoneal nodule, like you can get access to it from within easier than from without. He's showing that, how he did it laparoscopically and put the mesh laparoscopically. Again, this is the same concept that you mentioned. It is the value of we learn from each other all the time.



[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I'm lucky to have such talented and smart friends who are so generous with their time. So many people have- for our patients, have spent time with me, have done these courses like you've done, like our colleagues have done. It is a great circle where you give to someone, they give to someone else, it always comes back around. You mentioned that hysterectomy and endometriosis from prior surgery, all those things lead to scar tissue. Something I've found to be really challenging is to know what should we be taking out? What is the lesion? What is normal scarring? Because there's plenty of folks that have scarring that don't have endometriosis. Vaginal cleft is a scar. What do we take out and how far to go? A lot of opinions, oh, this is fibrotic, it all has to come. No, here's just the one nodule here, are we really going to go through and take out all the scar tissue that in a few weeks will again be a scar tissue? How do you know what's what?

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Again, you're asking very hard questions, but this is actually what I did for myself. When I excise a lesion, I name it in a way that gives me a clue when I review the pathology. For example, let's say peritoneal disease. When I'm sure it is endometriosis, I call it, I have my OR nurse, they call the lesion peritoneal endometriosis of the specific location that it was. When I'm taking an a peritoneal area, which I am not sure what it is, I don't call it endometriosis. I call it peritoneal biopsy suspected endometriosis. So that when I review,-

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
That's smart.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
I review my pathology reports and I compare my judgment every single time. How many times I was correct? How many times I was not correct? When I thought this is only scar tissue and actually came back endometriosis, when I called it endo and it was not endo. By time, you revise yourself and you keep learning, when you over call it, when you under call it. Then after a while, because you are revising yourself every single time and you are making yourself to go back and look at the images, and then you get better. For the deep endo, when I first started doing deep endo, I didn't know how it looked. It looked funny. This is not normal. I didn't know what is this. Then again, same philosophy, that everything I excise, you have to name it in a way that makes sense to you to be able to judge if you over call or you're under call compared to the pathology, because the pathology is the gold standard.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
It takes a lot of repetition and doing and doing and doing, but also there's additional steps you're taking of naming it in a certain way. It's such an ingenious way. Did you come up with that or is that something that someone else was doing? You thought about, because to me, that's- it's such a simple,-

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
It's very simple.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
Easy thing to do. When you're doing all these biopsies and some are endo, I don't remember which was which, and going back and taking pictures. By giving yourself that little clue, it's such a brilliant- it's a brilliant, simple little way to help yourself get better at identifying endometriosis. I love that. I think that'll be the thing that I take away the most from this is, it's a little thing that you do that's like, oh my God, it's so genius.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
No, and it's very simple, as you mentioned. One other thing that I really found very important is that you try to fight your ego. Because if you are the endometriosis person in the department, everybody will say, oh, I'm going to send it to Mark, he will just do it. But every single one of us will have a case that they should not do. For example, it is very hard for me to say, I'm going to stop or I'm not going to start a dissection where I don't see the end clear. You start when the end in your mind. I had patients where there is lesions invading the internal iliac vein. I say, I'm going to stop. This is something that, I don't know, some people have a hard time taking that call.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
No, it takes being self-aware. It takes being humble. I got some good advice. I think I told Arnie, every time I see him, but on the show too. That he told me when I was coming to Kentucky, listen, you're the first mixed person down there. Certainly we all get good training and fellowship, but you're a new surgeon, you're not seasoned yet. Don't be a cowboy, because if you do these things out beyond your scope, people will never send you patients again. It's not good patient care. Live with that. Your way of saying it is a little different than mine, but in my mind, I have algorithms for the case, right? If I see this, then this, if I see this-- If there's a question mark here, in any one of these steps, don't go down that path, right? If you don't have an answer for what you're going to do in this situation, don't start, because you can't go backwards in surgery.
I tell patients all the time, when you're talking about hysterectomy or some other IUD or pills that you can stop, or, hey, I can take your IUD out. I cannot put your uterus back. Just thinking about, how you get to these points and decisions for surgery, we're really good at taking stuff out. We're really bad at putting it back. Being able to have the self-awareness, take a step back, big picture, okay, what are we actually trying to accomplish here? What's the end goal? Will we still accomplish our goal? If the goal ultimately is patient safety and good outcomes, we have to weigh all of that. Yes, it does take some humility. It does take some ego. You don't want to be scared either, right? You don't want to take patients at OR and just dabble around, and they've gotten a surgery they didn't need. Knowing your skill level and knowing the surgeries you want to do and committing to it, because I think one of the challenges we have in our profession is folks that operate a little bit. When you're operating a little bit, just like if you did a little bit of OB, it's not fun when you're dabbling in something and get into really challenging things.
Having that self-awareness, that support structure, knowing what your practice looks like, who your partners are, what your support looks like, and that's different for every practice, but knowing where you fit in the scheme of things. You are not the center of the universe in that situation. I think that's a great point. I think that you have to be very thoughtful about that, but yes, just understanding what's the goal here? Why are we here? That's the biggest question we surgeons can ask ourselves, I think.

(7) Commitment to Endometriosis Care

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
One of the things that I really want to mention, that if you really want to do deep endometriosis surgery, you have to devote a lot of your practice to that. I would say, at this point, I- maybe 75% of what I do is endometriosis. If you like something and you feel that you are actually have passion, it gives you the time and energy to learn more and get better and spend time and not just do it once in a little bit. You do it all the time.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
No, and I think that's true, and our fellowships are pretty variable. Some even have some urogyne, but some are very fibroid heavy, some are very heavy and deep endo. Where I trained at the time, there wasn't as much advanced endo, and that's something I had to learn about over the years. I've had some good partners I've worked with over the years and I've had to develop that skillset. Fibroids, man, we were all over that. That's a big part of my practice. Whereas, some practices are so big into endometriosis. Sometimes you say, listen, this is a challenging case. I've certainly referred patients to my colleagues outside of my institution, because it's not about me. I think ultimately, if patients know that, they'll send the word around that you're a good doc and your practice will be fine.
This idea that, oh, you're giving up a hysterectomy. It's not your uterus. You got to go make sure the patients are in the right place. Sometimes it's hard for us to admit. It doesn't happen often. It certainly happens less often the longer you do it. Ultimately, I'm for good patient outcomes. There's no pride in any of the work that we do. There's no ego. It is simply just trying to surround yourself by good people, good partners, good teammates, good OR staff, and the patients deserve us to be paying attention and doing the right thing.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
The other thing that I would add, and I agree with everything you said. One thing I would add is that you want to minimize intraoperative surprises. There is no, I'm going to start, I'm going to look and see what I'm going to do. No. If this patient has bowel endometriosis, we're not going to find out in the operating room. No. We're going to find out before. We're going to discuss the management. We're going to talk about risks. We're going to have colorectal surgery available. Somebody that you know and you operated with and not like, catch him on a fly while he's flying out of town in one hour. No. Everything is planned.

[Dr. Mark Hoffman]
I am with you. I do not like going-- Sometimes it's hard because that means we have to wait a few more weeks to get to the OR or things like that. But I tell them, look, I've said this a hundred times, a thousand times, patients understand complications. They understand it. Really don't like surprises. Listen, looks like there's really bad endo, we may have to do a resection. You may wake up with an ostomy. Is this what you want to do? This is based on what we're seeing, feeling, finding, this is a significant risk for you. We'll try to do a primary reanastomosis, but ultimately, this is a possibility. They wake up with an ostomy and they're thrilled, but if they thought they were going in there for a simple hysterectomy and wake up with something like that, that's incomparable in terms of the impact on the patients.
You have to do the extra work, and it can be challenging because patients, understandably, they're in pain. They're suffering. We do not want to delay their care. We do not want to delay their treatment. You got to go be the physician and say, listen, I'm sorry, but I need to make sure we get in there and do it right the first time. No, I think that's how I practice, too. I want to schedule it with the people I know that can do the right job at the time. I've got my surgeons that I want to work with. I have my people that I want to be there. I want their input and their availability. Like you said, not like, hey, are you around today? What's going on? Where are you? Can you pop in for a few minutes? No. This is a partnership. This is, we're doing this case together, and it's going to be the best thing for the patient. I love that. That's a great point, and I appreciate it.
I think we've talked really about, number one, that this is something that we have to consider in all patients, even if they've had a hysterectomy. Hysterectomy, and we talked about this with Keith Isaacson, peritoneal endometriosis probably is not the explanation for dyspareunia or uterine pain, right? There's some adenomyosis. Hysterectomy can be part of the treatment plan for pain. For peritoneal endometriosis, it's certainly deep disease, hysterectomy is not the answer. Getting comfortable in those spaces, especially when they've had a hysterectomy, is really that pre-op workup, that pre-op history, that pre-op evaluation, getting all that imaging. At the end of the day, sending the patient to somebody who's done this a ton, there aren't a lot of mods out there, but there's enough out there doing great work that we need to understand if our patients are coming in after hysterectomy, known endometriosis, you have to have your flags raised, be aware, and think, man, this could be maybe one of the hardest cases we could see, and make sure that they get the best- our patients get the best opportunities to get a good outcome.
I appreciate it. It's late for you. You've made time for us. I think this is something that I definitely learned from, and I think our listeners will appreciate it too. Emad, such a good time. Always a pleasure to see you, and catch up, and thank you so much for coming on the show.

[Dr. Emad Mikhail]
Mark, thank you so much for having me.

Podcast Contributors

Dr. Emad Mikhail discusses Clinical Pearls: Managing Endometriosis Post-Hysterectomy on the BackTable 76 Podcast

Dr. Emad Mikhail

Dr. Emad Mikhail is a gynecologic surgeon at Tampa General Hospital in Tampa, Florida.

Dr. Mark Hoffman discusses Clinical Pearls: Managing Endometriosis Post-Hysterectomy on the BackTable 76 Podcast

Dr. Mark Hoffman

Dr. Mark Hoffman is a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon at the University of Kentucky.

Cite This Podcast

BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2025, January 14). Ep. 76 – Clinical Pearls: Managing Endometriosis Post-Hysterectomy [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com

Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.

Up Next

Surgical Considerations in Chronic Pelvic Pain with Dr. Mark Dassel on the BackTable OBGYN Podcast)
Endometrial Ablation: Past, Present & Future with Dr. Ted Anderson on the BackTable OBGYN Podcast)
Laparoscopy in Pregnancy: Key Considerations for Surgeons with Dr. Craig Sobolewski on the BackTable OBGYN Podcast)
The Business of Gynecology in Canada with Dr. Jonathon Solnik on the BackTable OBGYN Podcast)
Surgeon to CMO: Navigating the Career Shift with Dr. Mark Hoffman on the BackTable OBGYN Podcast)
Non-Opiod Pain Management in GYN Surgery with Dr. Paula Bilica and Dr. Steven McCarus on the BackTable OBGYN Podcast)

Articles

Rethinking Hysterectomy for Endometriosis: Is it Really the Best Solution?

Rethinking Hysterectomy for Endometriosis: Is it Really the Best Solution?

Topics

Learn about Career Inspiration on BackTable OBGYN
Hysterectomy Procedure Prep
Learn about Urology on BackTable OBGYN
bottom of page