Hysteropexy vs Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

First, Suzette and Olivia discuss the value of keeping the uterus in place for women undergoing prolapse repairs, as well as the indications for apical suspension surgery. They also note the historical context of hysterectomy and why it has been the go-to treatment for so long. Next, the doctors discuss the advantages of hysteropexy over hysterectomy for prolapse repair, such as a shorter operative time, less bleeding, and a quicker recovery. The doctors then go into more detail about the best approaches for prolapse repair, like weighing the options of permanent sutures versus delayed absorbable sutures. They also analyze recurrence rates after prolapse surgery, specifically in the anterior compartment.

Then, they explore the data on how the choice to keep the uterus in place can stem from a woman's personal and cultural views. Olivia shares about the Value of Uterus questionnaire, a six-question survey instrument that can quantify how a woman values her uterus. It can streamline clinic visits and help to predict whether a woman would choose a uterine-preserving procedure. The doctors note that there is research demonstrating a correlation between valuing the uterus and sexual activity.

Finally, Suzette and Olivia contraindications for leaving the uterus in place. They emphasize the importance of assessing for abnormal uterine bleeding and cervical pathology before recommending uterine preservation. They suggest that listeners review the current guidelines around preoperative workup and consider transvaginal ultrasound or endometrial biopsy first. Lastly, they emphasize the importance of symptom and risk stratification and shared decision making when it comes to uterine preservation.