BackTable / Urology / Podcast / Transcript #96
Podcast Transcript: Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Practical Startup Guide
with Dr. Matthew Allaway and Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges
On this episode of BackTable Urology, Dr. Aditya Bagrodia, Dr. Matt Allaway (Perineologic Biopsy), and Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges (UC San Diego) discuss benefits and procedural tips for the transperineal prostate biopsy. You can read the full transcript below and listen to this episode here on BackTable.com.
Table of Contents
(1) Rationale for Switching to Transperineal Biopsies
(2) Performing a Biopsy in the Clinic: Necessary Equipment
(3) Beginning the Procedure: Needles, Blocks & the Learning Curve
(4) Equipment Preferences: Advantages & Drawbacks
(5) Cognitive & Fusion Biopsy Techniques
(6) The Freehand Technique in Prostate Biopsy
(7) Step-By-Step Walkthrough of a Transperineal Biopsy Procedure
(8) Takeaways: the Value of Transperineal Biopsies
This podcast is supported by:
Listen While You Read
Follow:
Subscribe:
Sign Up:
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
Hello everyone and welcome back to the Back Table Podcast, your source for all things urology. You can find all previous episodes of our podcast on iTunes, Spotify, and at backtable.com. This is Aditya Bagrodia, your host this week, and I'm very excited to introduce our guest today, Matt Allaway, who's a practicing urologist in Cumberland, Maryland, and also the founder of the Paraneurolgic device company, which has largely made transperineal biopsies disseminable in the US. Also, Juan Javier-DesLoges, one of my partners here at UC, San Diego. Matt, Juan, how are you guys doing today?
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
Great.
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
Fantastic.
(1) Rationale for Switching to Transperineal Biopsies
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
Hey, thanks for spending some time with us this afternoon. As I was preparing for this podcast, I was thinking to myself, I grew up on transrectal and fire biopsies, my blocks worked, my clinically significant cancer detection rates for zones three, four, and five were 30%, 60%, and 90%. Every year or so there was a patient who got a bout of sepsis from his biopsy. Why rock the boat? Why do I need to change anything?
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
That is the question and there are two answers to the question. Obviously, the first is complications, which span from rectal bleeding, to infections, to sepsis. In fact, in Norway, they've essentially banned the transrectal biopsy because in that smaller country, they had a handful, five to eight, of deaths a year from a prostate biopsy. We've got complications on one side and then we have cancer detection on the other. There's definitely a building body of data that's showing that the transperineal approach offers the trajectory in order to really sample the prostate properly.
To understand the prostate you've got to understand that these zones are all pancaked within each other and it's not shaped like a rectangle or a box. It's a complicated sphere and we know now where the cancers are hiding and we know just by simple logic of geometrical vectors that going transrectal is not doing the best job of capturing the disease. Those I think are the two issues that in my life pushed me to dedicate the last eight years of research and work in industry to try to change that.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
I think when we think about any intervention, whether that's a surgery, a procedure, a drug, we often think about safety and efficacy. In some ways, I'm a little bit proud of myself because I do think you can teach an old dog new tricks and I've shifted towards transperineal biopsies. One of the reasons I really thought it'd be nice to have Juan on is Juan has really spearheaded our program here at UC, San Diego, in terms of moving these biopsies, which are being done by a former member of the department primarily in the OR, to the clinic.
I thought we could just walk through. You're a practicing provider, academic, private practice, small group, or large group, and one fine day you decide that it's time to start doing transperineal biopsies. When you make that decision, let's just walk through that whole process of making this a reality. Juan, what were some of the first things that you thought about when you were like, "I want to do transperineal biopsies and I want to do them in the clinic?"
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
Back in 2001, one of my mentors, Dr. Parsons spearheaded our transperineal prostate biopsy program. I had done transperineal cryoablation and some SpaceOAR as a resident, but I'd never really done biopsies and he had encouraged me to do it. He said, "If you know how to do those, you understand how to look at things in transperineal, you should think about doing the biopsies." I was a little skeptical about it. As a resident, I had really only done fusion biopsies with the Artemis machine transrectal and I came to watch them in the OR.
The biopsies were about 50 minutes long plus turnover. We were doing somewhere around six biopsies in a day, if things were going well in our outpatient pavilion. It just was clunky to use one of your words. Then, my mentor left; he went into industry. Suddenly, I was the only person that knew how to do transperineal prostate biopsies in the department. I was like, "Well, how can I make this more efficient and effective?" I basically looked at every ultrasound you could find. I looked at every biopsy attachment. I went to the AUA course. I met Dr. Allaway there.
(2) Performing a Biopsy in the Clinic: Necessary Equipment
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
Before we get into all the details, you had the benefit of having somebody who was able to teach you and a mentor. Let's say that you don't have that benefit, you didn't do cryos or transperineal biopsies. What are the bare minimum equipment requirements that one would need? Matt, say that my platform is, I have a UroNav machine and a BK ultrasound that I use to do MRI ultrasound fusion biopsies in my clinic. Is that sufficient? Can I do a transperineal biopsy tomorrow?
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
The table that you use, the procedural table, I think is an important consideration because of the stirrups. You've got heel crutches, you've got the stirrup for the heel, and you've got the fancy sort of yellowfin stirrups, which would be like the Rolls Royce of sorts. If you're going to start your program using heel stirrups, and Juan, I don't know if you appreciated this, but when patients are in that position and they're nervous, they tighten up their legs and they actually push themselves away from you, so they're moving and sliding away from you. You really should switch over at least to the knee crutch because the knee crutch allows them to relax their legs. If they're in the heel stirrup, they have to use their leg muscles to support their knees so they don't flop aside. That's really important.
Number two, your ultrasound equipment. You mentioned you got UroNav with a BK. There you go, you're all set. Now, Juan will definitely jump in on this, but the probes, the transducers, many urologists don't even understand what they're holding in their hands. Yes, I have a biplanar probe, why can't I use that? No, we're talking about a linear array, not a micro convex biplanar probe. You can do transperineal biopsies with a biplanar transrectal probe, but the skill level to do that is quite different than if you're using your brachytherapy biplanar linear transducer.
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
I think I looked at every single ultrasound on the market from GE, Hitachi, BK, to the cheapest $30,000 probe that you can buy, I can't even remember the name of it. In addition to that, you really need to be able to determine the difference between the transition zone and the peripheral zone with the probe. Based on the quality of your probe, you want to make sure that the ultrasound is high enough quality where you can really define the peripheral zone and the transition zone.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
We've entered this conversation assuming it's a foregone conclusion that we're going to be doing this not in the operating room. Juan, you're loud and clear that the time of the procedure, the cost, the anesthetic, all of that, it's something to consider. Certainly, for me, one of my biggest reluctances heading into this were: what if my block doesn't work or how's my familiarity with the anatomy going to be, given that I used to use end-fire. What I did, as you know, is shadowed you, worked with you, participated with you for 10, 15 cases. I said, "Okay, I think I can handle this." Then, I started doing my own cases in the operating room. Any thoughts on starting out in the OR versus the clinic? Do you have any strong opinions, Matt or Juan?
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
I think starting in the OR has an advantage to put a plug in there. I do think that the AUA course is quite helpful for new learners. I had been doing it a year, by the time I went to the course. You pick up on a lot of little nuances that some of the other people are doing. I think just some didactics, plus doing them in the OR, would be helpful for anybody just starting up.
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
I would say those that just jump right in. I've trained hundreds of urologists in hundreds of different settings all throughout the world. I would tell you that in the US those that start under anesthesia sometimes they're not sure when to cut the umbilical cord. When am I ready to do this under local in the clinic? The ones that just dive in in the clinic, they actually get over that learning curve of getting comfortable knowing how to get the patient through it. I think they develop a good local anesthesia program faster. If you're in the OR, you always can lean on that anesthesia, so I think it's up to the individual. Those using fusion, sometimes they feel, "Well, when I trained on fusion, I prefer the patient to be under much better control, more relaxed, and I prefer it being done under anesthesia."
Well, I don't think that's the case anymore with transperineal. I think the whole point of what I worked on was I worked and developed everything with the precision point in a surgery center that we own and operate. I have a grid stepper that sits in the corridor. I never once used the grid stepper to do the biopsy because I knew that wasn't the path to mainstream the approach. The path to mainstream this approach is we've got to do it in less than 15 minutes under local anesthesia. We've got to make this teachable, we've got to make this deployable in the widespread urology community.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
This is a podcast so most people can't tell that I'm grinning and I'm grinning because I've taught myself some things like robotic retroperitoneal lymph dissection, even robotic cystectomies were not something that I was trained on in residency or fellowship, necessarily. As I reflect, I think it was actually moving transperineal biopsies to the clinic that provided me the most anxiety and consternation among all the different things I do. Your cut-the-umbilical cord analogy totally resonates with me.
I guess, that's debatable, depending on your comfort going into this and having partners that are familiar, if you want to start in the OR and also your familiarity with side-fire versus end-fire probes, I suppose, you could make a decision. Basic equipment, just basic, basic equipment, if you needed this, you wanted to watch like 10 YouTube videos: it would be a biplanar linear ultrasound probe and a grid stepper, things that your hospital already may have in the OR or do you even need the grid stepper? What would you say to that?
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
Well, I would say, this may be another discussion point. I don't want to hijack the grid dialogue, but I think Juan would probably agree with me that the grid, first of all, the experience with freehand versus grid is quite different, in my opinion. I think that people think the grid technique simplifies it because it's like playing battleship: just stick it in the hole and it goes where you think it's going to go. If you really study the trajectory of the biopsy needle, you're really having to insert a lot more needles to finesse that biopsy needle exactly into that seam. Now when I teach, I say you're playing an instrument; it's like learning to play the violin. Your music is the prostate under ultrasound, you have to read that music.
Every prostate is a little bit different. Transrectal was like "Boom, boom, boom", and you're done. There's very little appreciation for finesse and where you are in the prostate. You tend to cluster cores, even though you don't realize it. You've got to be able to read that. As a result, I think the grid is just too limiting and I don't think it serves a purpose of training wheels to help you do something better in the clinic setting. That would be my opinion.
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
I think the grid is the historic way of doing the biopsy, that's how original transperineal biopsies were done a long time ago. We've made so much more progress over time with the attachments.
(3) Beginning the Procedure: Needles, Blocks & the Learning Curve
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
The music analogy and the finesse totally resonates as well. The first ones I did, under supervision of course, it's just like, "Okay, good, I can see the anatomy. I can see where we want to inject our blocks. I can clearly even familiarize myself with a new way of describing the process." It's not like the base, mid, apex, needle, and lateral. Now, we're talking about posterior middle, interior middle, lateral, and so on and so forth.
I think there's a learning curve. Maybe on round one I can identify the prostate reliably and biopsy it and not have things like skeletal muscle or adipose tissue, which I think sometimes people in their early days have, or a lot of fibromuscular stroma or so forth. It is a process and it is a little bit more nuanced perhaps than the transrectal approach. We've got an ultrasound. That's mandatory. We've got an actual biopsy gun, whether that's a disposable or reusable. Is anything else even required at this point?
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
I think you need a needle sheath. You don't want to stick the patient 20 different times. I know that there's a couple of groups out there that have looked at the disposable angiocaths. I'm a little hesitant to use it. When I was a resident, I saw that when you re-shoot the needle through a plastic angiocath it can actually shear off the plastic. We use a metal biopsy needle sheath similar to what Dr. Allaway does. I think that's the minimum. Do you actually need the attachment? I think you could make an argument for not using it. It makes it go much faster though when you have an attachment there.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
I feel like for people that think about this all the time these mundane things are not something you spend time thinking about. Explicitly, you're talking about like a 14 gauge metallic needle. You've got your ultrasound probe in the rectum, you're going to place that at the ten and two o'clock position and try to get it to just set the apical most aspect of the prostate. Does that sound about right?
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
Yes, 16 gauge probably I think.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
16 gauge. You get that in there and then basically, you're going to take your biopsy gun, secure that needle in some type of position, which is challenging, I think we can all attest to that, then take your course. That's bare minimum. Now, you can do it in the OR. You don't have to necessarily worry about your blocks. I think of course if you could do a block that would be maybe better for the patient but that's the basics. Is that true?
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
Yes, and I think you just mentioned the block. We've talked about the anxiety of those first cases under straight local. The block here is distinctly different from a block for transrectal. A transrectal block injected at the base of the prostate, the old Mount Everest sign is approaching the hypogastric nerves. The transperineal block is a combination of mostly pudendal nerve and hypogastrics.
The hypogastric nerves live underneath the pelvic floor muscle. They're between the pelvic floor muscle and the capsule of the prostate at the apex. All your pudendal branches then splay out in the subcutaneous tissue. They tend to be in higher concentrations, intimate with the muscle. The training, I think, on learning how to do this right, not being too medial, being more lateral, understanding the nerves that you're blocking is part of this whole training concept. It's really not just about poking the prostate through the perineum. Yes, that's going to reduce infections, but I was working with a group in Michigan and their pathologist said, "Our cancer detection dropped when we switched to transperineal." I said, "Wow, really?" I dug in deeper and they were using a grid stepper and they didn't even realize it, but they were basically biopsying the transitional zone. A bad transperineal biopsy could yield potentially lower cancer detection than a transrectal, for that reason. The training is the biggest monster for us to tackle.
As Juan mentioned, you've got these hands-on courses, but there's no phantom in the world that simulates the feel of the perineum. There's no way to learn this other than being in the room with the urologist and walking them through it. I decided to tackle this at an industry level, which means I've got to try to convert the US and the world into this technique. These people, they've been practicing, some of them for a couple of decades. We can't wait for the residents to be matriculated through their training programs to make this movement happen. That's going to take 20 years. That's really the big challenge. I think the key thing is proper training and support because sometimes we have to be there side by side with urologists for 15, 20 cases before they're ready to fly on their own. That's a big commitment and no courses or PowerPoint presentations can make up for that hands-on experience.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
I definitely appreciate that. I've been here for a year-and-a-half and it took me a year and a half to do enough, commit mentally that this is something I'm interested in: do them in the OR under supervision, do them myself in the OR, and then in the clinic. I absolutely hear you loud and clear. We've mentioned the AUA course. Matt, it sounds like you were also available to do some proctoring mentorship. Before we get into some more of the details, any other resources that you guys have found to be particularly helpful on top of that?
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
I think the room. You don't want a crowded, tight room; you don't want too many people. These are more logistical things, but I think you've got to consider this. I find that a nice room, good temperature control, preferably some music playing in the background. This stuff sounds pretty corny, but I'm telling you it makes a world of difference.
Training your staff to spend most of their time focused on the patient experience and you as the urologist focusing on how to do the job almost by yourself. When I do the biopsies, I have a clipboard that sits on the patient's super pubic area and I have my blue pathology sponges and I'm putting my cores directly on the sponges myself.
As soon as they're done handing off the local anesthetic, spinal needle, et cetera, at that point going forward, with the biopsy gun, I'm doing it all by myself. The one staff member working with me is focused on that patient. Creating a room environment with preferably some yacht rock music in the background makes for a very nice experience for the patient. That's where we get these pain scores down to a level that's comparable, if not better than transrectal.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
A couple of thoughts on that, Matt. I don't think it's corny at all. I think a little squeeze of the pressure bag during a cysto, having some nice zen yoga music or whatever in the background can totally help diffuse some of the anxiety. I'm on board. Then, just having staff that cares and understands that this is a big day for that patient, even though it may be your fourth biopsy of the day. We very intentionally have walked through a bare-bones approach to transperineal with as much or as little formal involved hands-on mentoring type of training.
Now maybe we can switch to more ideal land. I want to do this, I want to do it right, and let's just say you got a million dollars at your disposal. I'm in academics, so I'm going to go to my chairman and say, "I've got a couple of capital requests here." Maybe we start out with the probe. Juan had mentioned that there are a couple of different options out there. Assuming you don't have any vested interest in these companies, any probes that you think might be a little bit more amenable to doing transperineal biopsies?
(4) Equipment Preferences: Advantages & Drawbacks
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
Well, I created the precision point to be agnostic. I understood that on the West Coast, they like Hitachi and they like BK, but you see a little more concentration of Hitachi. In the Midwest, East Coast, it's predominantly BK, but you've also got GE. You have some of the new smaller players. You've got Terason which is sold by the sales team at Hitachi, which has now been bought by Fuji, and GE bought BK. You've got Terason, you've got the Arietta with Fuji, you've got the BK systems, then you've got Mindray and you've got SonoSite, which are the lower-cost systems.
In Europe, about 20% of our users use the transrectal probe. It's not the linear side fire probe biplanar. It's actually the old transrectal probe. We tried to do that in the US, but let me tell you, if you've got the money and resources and you have the option of either in the holster or ultrasound, you'll never choose the micro convex biplanar probe. You'll always go grab your biplanar linear transducer. Now, BK has one advantage over the competition. You can run a live dual screen, so you can run sagittal and axial live, simultaneously. That's a huge advantage for the new learner because they can start to wrap their head around seeing the biopsy needle flash from both perspectives.
When I developed the system, I used an old BK that was called a pro focus. You couldn't run them live dual because once you learn the technique, you're going to pretty much depend on your sagittal array. When you look at the sagittal linear transducer array, why does it cost so much money? It costs so much money because if you look at how long that array is compared to a micro convex, each one of those diamond crystals is positioned by hand. Each crystal has a wire going in it and a wire going out of it. It's almost theoretically impossible to make a proper probe and sell it for much less than about $15,000 because somebody's got to make a little bit of profit. I've had people use every level of equipment and I think Juan hit it right though. You've got to be able to see the delineations between the zones. I personally use a BK Specto because if you've got people coming in, I have people coming into my training facility all month and if they don't have access to fusion, we've got to teach them cognitive. I think having both live images simultaneously really helps you train somebody on how to do a proper cognitive biopsy. That's one big advantage.
If you just look at linear arrays technology, I think the Fuji is excellent. I think GE has a new system where they've re-released the biplanar probe with linear. I think the visuals on that are quite nice also and then when you get it, you get what you pay for like anything else. I think most urologists need to understand that if you're going to make this transition, I don't really have users that say, "Oh, I use transperineal for this and I use transrectal for that." It's pretty much a shift and once you make that shift, you might as well invest in good equipment that's going to last you. Do you want to drive a Tesla or do you want to drive a Chevy Volt? The choice is yours, but I'd probably pick the Tesla if I could. It's capital equipment and you get a lot of hemming and hawing at the university levels on capital purchases, but you get what you pay for and the quality equipment lasts longer, but please, respect the probe too. I tell people, "Handle the probe more carefully than a baby." A baby can bounce. An ultrasound probe doesn't bounce. It hits the floor and you're out. You're out $15,000 to $20,000, so remember that.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
I appreciate that, Matt. I'm pretty sure if you just showed them a bill from the last urosepsis, I had a nice ICU stay with ID, and everybody and their mom consulted, the financials level would be pretty compelling. Good. Juan, we've decided that we're going to purchase our linear probe and I hear you loud and clear, especially as a historic end-fire guy, the dual live view is massive, so specifically you can see the prostate and the axle views and the side views as well. That's really nice.
Now you mentioned, Matt, cognitive versus a true fusion. Juan, I believe you were trained on OR cognitive fusion. Some of it was fortunate that we needed some work on our previous MRI ultrasound fusion machine. How did you decide that it was probably the UroNav transperineal transrectal fusion software that we were going to go with?
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
When we were looking at it, we looked at KOELIS and we looked at Artemis and we looked at UroNav, which I think are basically the three major platforms. I think micro-ultrasound has some fusion which is like a fancy or less fancy cognitive version. The Artemis does not translate well to transperineal because it is a fixed arm. You really need to be able to move your arm around and have more of a fixed needle as opposed to a fixed ultrasound.
Many of the hand motions that you use when you do a transperineal are quite different from transrectal. When we do transrectal, we move the probe in and out of the rectum and we do a twisting motion or a roll. We roll the probe back and forth to do the biopsy. When we do transperineal, it's like the old aircraft terminology, you pitch the probe up and down so you can access the anterior and the posterior and you move it medial and lateral. Those motions, for the large part, really the only one that I could find worked well was the UroNav system. I realize there are other people that do it with some other stuff. For us, I think UroNav made the most sense.
To go back to the capital equipment cost, all the stuff we've bought, we use it for SpaceOAR in the clinic too. It's multi-use. Just because you bought a transperineal probe doesn't mean you can just do biopsies. You can do the SpaceOAR, which we're looking to roll out soon. It can be used for multiple things.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
Pitch and yaw, so basically, we're thinking about the anal verge as a fulcrum and we're going to drop our hand to sample more anteriorly. We're going to elevate our hand to sample more posteriorly. Is this correct?
(5) Cognitive & Fusion Biopsy Techniques
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
Yes, it's a whole new set of hand motions so much so that part of the training exercise, when you're working with urologists that have been out there for years doing transrectals, is untraining them on the habits of transrectal and teaching the new hand motions. To the fusion concept, I think when I train people on, let's say, UroNav, what I'll do is I'll actually cover the UroNav screen and force them to use their brain to anchor the biopsy needle in the vicinity of the ROI, requiring them to actually look at their own MRI and then anchoring the needle in to the capsule in the vicinity. Then and only then I take away the cover over the UroNav screen and then they introduce secondary motions and then they biopsy.
If you think that the fusion system is going to do the job for you, I compare it to this, we're trying to teach you how to play a stradivarius, but if you just think that fusion by itself is the only thing you need to know is watch that green circle and hit it, that's like playing guitar hero. You don't really know how to play the instrument. It's playing music and sometimes it's pretty good, but you've got to know. Cognitives like a Rand McNally Atlas. I'm trying to get to San Diego to visit you guys. I look at Rand McNally Atlas and I drive that way.
Fusion is like using your iPhone with one of your map apps. In 200 feet, turn right, turn left. Juan, you can please chime in, but you've got to use both of those skills. If you're not using your brain and reading that music, you could really turn the fusion experience into something like "Uh-oh, I didn't even get prostate tissue with that ROI. I got skeletal muscle or fat." If you know how to do two together, one plus one equals three. It's like icing on the cake to just be able to say, "I feel really good about it." Check cognitive, check fusion.
Then I actually sometimes like to go back after the neal is in the prostate, go back to your axial array, just on your ultrasound screen, and look for that flash and then remember the image you had in your head of the ROI on the axial T2 image and say, "Yes, that makes sense." Then, Juan, do you inspect your cores? I think you need to look at the DM core too because if you hit the ROI and it's really cancer, it's going to be dense and the core looks much different than a non-cancerous region that's all flimsy and fragmented. That's the way I kind of teach it.
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
I don't think I've looked at the cores themselves, but it's a thing that I think I'll start thinking about doing. I completely agree with you, for cognitive, one of the things that we're doing, but we're cheating now. We've asked for access to the radiologist DynaCAD software where we can actually just see the whole length of the ROI and how they mapped it out because when you look at the MRI reports, there's one spot, but the ROI is actually quite longer. I do a combination between the two because there is registration error as hard as you try to avoid it. These tiny, little, subcentimeter lesions can be very easily missed even with the Fusion software. I think actually really knowing both really has made my biopsies better because before when I was a resident, I just was on auto drive. I was an autopilot. Artemis was going and I would just aim for the target. Now, I do Fusion, UroNavs, but I also, as you mentioned, do a little bit of cognitive, simultaneously.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
A couple of comments, and I certainly appreciate that perspective. One of the things that was a pleasant surprise is that the actual registering of the prostate with the UroNav, if you're going to go with a transperineal approach, is not markedly different from a transrectal approach. That wasn’t like an entire new skill set to learn, which I appreciated. I absolutely hear you. I think that using your analogies, which I like, Matt, I think doing a transrectal approach where you see the prostate, there's very little doubt about what exactly you're seeing. The base, and the apex, and the SVs are all fairly there. Might be the equivalent of coloring in a coloring book and then perhaps really understanding the prostate and where the lesions are are going to be something like a higher-quality piece of art. It is nice.
That was one thing that was not so intimidating when shifting towards the fusion biopsies that are actually registering as pretty comparable. Now, we've got our ultrasound probe. We've decided to really go hook line and sinker. We've got ultrasound fusion software. I also got to say, prior to coming here, I always thought that cognitive fusion biopsies were an absolute tier B option. I think that they may have more of a role transperineally. Any opinion on that?
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
I think Juan hit it on the money. I actually have a DynaCAD workstation myself. I do all my ROIs personally. It's good for teaching urologists, it's good for teaching residents, and you become really familiar with that patient's prostate. You're like, "Oh, that lesion is la, la, la." To Juan's point, if you're going to miss the lesion transperineal, it's going to be from the medial-to-lateral perspective more or less. Once you anchor your needle in the capsule at the apex and then you fire in the SEMA tissue in the relevant zone, the needle's passing all the way from the apex to the mid prostate, maybe the base, if it's short enough.
With transrectal, it's an apical to basal issue too. You've got two different ways of messing it up: if you're too medial or too lateral, or too apical or too basil. With transperineal, we eliminate that problem, and so you just plow through that. To that other point about looking at your cores, if you look at your core on a blue pathology sponge and you see two really robust meaty cores, you know that's not falsely thick because you went transrectal and veered in the TZ because the TZ cores will look like a cancer core. If you stay just in the PZ, for example, and it's a dense, thick core, you got two cores. You know you hit it out of the money. You're done. Move on. Do your systematics and call it a day. If they're flimsy and fragmented, then you might take three or four until you're certain, but you can move easily from medial to lateral saturating around the ROI. I think that's why we saw the results in that.
Juan, did you guys read the manuscript in the Journal of Urology from that big, multidisciplinary, young urology collaborative, where they compared transrectal to transperineal fusion? They had hundreds of men in both cohorts. All the men that were done transrectal were done with fusion. The transperineal cohort was done in a mixed-bag fashion, meaning I think only about a third of them were done with Fusion software. Transperineal beats the transrectal on cancer detection of all grades. This was a group of about 15 urologists. Juan is an ace. You have to remember that not everyone's a maestro. In urology, you've got various levels of skill sets. We have to make this reproducible. I think that study shows that it is reproducible in that fashion. That was a pretty exciting paper.
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
I was going to say, yes, I read it also. I think one of the biggest differences when you go transperineal is the whole core is a peripheral zone, or it should be. When you go transrectal, you can get a fair amount of transition zone in there, kind of a mixed core. I think that that does improve the cancer detection rate, in my mind.
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
Then when you're going anterior, think about a transrectal, your vector, it's like taking a pool stick and poking up at your ceiling to get an anterior lesion. With transperineal, you're flying into the anterior zone exactly. In fact, the Italians, when I train a lot of Italians in Italy, they have the ultrasound screen upside down. The anterior prostate looks like it's posterior and vice versa. Sometimes I feel like doing that in the US so that people could really study the anterior prostate with such commitment as they do the posterior peripheral zone.
I don't know, Juan, what your experience has been, but I'm fascinated with anterior disease and I'm fascinated with how much we've missed historically and how much lives up there. It's really wild that when I trained on my 12-core transrectal, I never touched that tissue. Never. MRI told us, "Hey, guys, it's over there at the ceiling. What are you doing down there?" That was a great lesson. I think we find a lot of cancers up in the anterior horn. To get that transrectal, your vector is so biased that you often are in the capsule, in the tissue, and then out of the capsule. You're really not getting a representative sample.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
I'm again, grinning because in some of my early experiences, I did have a little bit of oversampling of the anterior fibromuscular stroma. Suffice to say that was never an issue, problem, or a concern when I was going transrectal.
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
That deserves a slight pause though. If I could only selfishly grab a moment and get your opinions. Anterior disease, everybody thinks it's anterior transitional zone. I believe firmly that no important cancers originate from the transitional zone. I have never once found a posterior transitional zone high-grade tumor that didn't invade from the peripheral zone. Not once. I've been talking with pathologists that still do whole mounts and they're like, "You're right. Never seen it." Then why would there be anterior transitional zone, high-grade lesions, and never in the posterior TZ? Doesn't make any sense at all.
Thus, it does not come from the TZ. Where are these anterior tumors coming from? They're coming from the peripheral zone that sweeps, or they're coming from some tissue. I could bore you to death showing you MRI images of these tumors that just seem to be riding very, very anterior and then they grow into the TZ. They grow easier into the TZ from anterior than they do posterior. That's why they're often larger tumors too. Not because we missed them with the past two biopsies.
(6) The Freehand Technique in Prostate Biopsy
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
I think they're all intriguing points. Obviously, the access to vasculature and the ability to disseminate right there with the DVC or things I think are all important or intriguing from a pathophysiology perspective. We've talked a little bit about the probe. We've talked about fusion versus cognitive. Now, we've been talking without explicitly describing it: the freehand technique. When I would first hear discussions and debates on this, I honestly was just like, "What in God's green earth are they talking about?" Maybe I'll give it my relatively newcomer description and have you guys fill in the gaps.
Basically, you have a device that attaches to your ultrasound pro. I'd say it's maybe about 4 to 5 centimeters in height. It's got like a C-ring that you can tighten a screw and that attaches it to your probe. Then you've got a little bit of a seal with little slots in it. The purpose of that is that you can place any type of needle, whether that's your needle for local anesthesia injection, or whether that's an introducer sheath. Kind of a conduit to take you from the edge of the perineum to the apex of the prostate, where you can repeatedly pass your biopsy gun to sample various parts of the prostate.
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
On the money, yes, that's the way to describe it.
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
This is where I think I can tell a story. When I decided to ditch transrectal, literally, the decision was one day I woke up and said, "I'm not doing this anymore. I have the brachy probe. I got a good ultrasound. I'm not going to use a grid stepper. I got to figure out how to." I did cryo, but when I did cryo with the prostate, I never actually used the grid. I completely did it freehand. Then, I would use a Bookwalter retractor and then I would tie umbilical tape after I stuck each probe because I wanted to introduce the needle at biases because the prostate is not a box. I'd string all those probes together after they were stuck and lasso it to the Bookwalter, and then I'd freeze and do my thing.
I thought, "I'll just freehand it like that, but I need some kind of a cannula." In 2014, I published and I also presented at the AUA and got the best of the best video award for basically the freehand technique. I thought I was the first to do it, but the credit actually goes to the Italians. They beat me by years, but they didn't really make a big deal of it. They published on it. I never looked at the publication. I'm a private practice guy who was just trying to do a better job for my patients, but in the US it was establishing this new technique. People were throwing rotten tomatoes at me at the presentation. They're like, "Hold on, dude. Who are you? What are you talking about? How are you going to teach this?" I said, "We've got to come up with a way to make this reproducible and doable through only two punctures." The grid you're puncturing the perineum with each throw, with you're describing a metal stacked grid. It's basically you take a grid plate and you cut every column out except for the one that lies over the sagittal array, but you still poke, poke, poke, poke. The magic was to try to reinvent this by combining a large stiff coaxial needle with a guiding mechanism to do all these motions.
I think you have to separate in the pack. I call that the true coaxial needle technique. I call it chopsticks. We're back to an analogy. Eating food with chopsticks, you can do it, but I'd rather eat my food with a spoon or a fork, because I think I could do it faster and a little better. Not everyone can learn it this way. In fact, I got an email this morning from California. I can't identify the urologist: my first 62 transparent needle biopsies were done with a metal cannula and the time, effort, misalignment, and mistargets were too disadvantaged for me to ever go back. My cancer yield was also inferior to that achievement precision point, and then it goes on and on. That was the problem I faced when I tried to teach people. In the right hands, it can be done, but there are different ways to skin a cat here.I think you've got to choose your tool based on where your skillset is and what you're trying to achieve and really look at your results too. That's how I would summarize it.
(7) Step-By-Step Walkthrough of a Transperineal Biopsy Procedure
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
I like that. I think that's very practical. I can envision it. All right, now we've done our equipment, we've got the ultrasound probe, we've got a freehand device. I think the one that you've created and optimized, Matt , if I'm not mistaken, has probably been the one that's most commonly used. We've decided to do this either fusion, cognitive fusion, or MRI fusion and now it's D-day.
Juan, I know you to be a very thorough guy. Walk me through in gritty detail what this looks like from the patient walks in the room, even made with prep, enemas, all that kind of good stuff, and maybe I'll just pepper in some questions here and there, some clarification, we'll get Matt's input also.
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
Going back to when I said we were doing about 50 minutes in the OR now we do in about eight minutes and before I even bring that patient into the room, I mean we did an in-service with the nurses with PowerPoints, reviewed everything that I specifically wanted in the room. The patient walks in, he puts a gown on, he gets himself in position with his legs and the stirrups, we use paper tape to tape the scrotum up. We then shave the perineum but not the median raphe as I impress upon the residents. Then we use the Betadine stick. We don't use any wet prep to prep the perineum. In terms of an enema, originally everybody got an enema, now I just do it if they have a history of constipation. In terms of antibiotic use, when we were first doing them, everybody got Keflex or Ancef when they're in the OR. Then when I became an attending in July, I just said, "I'm just not going to give it anymore and see what happens based on the Lancet oncology publication," and nobody got an infection. I selectively will use antibiotics for somebody who's got an external catheter, somebody who's got a history of recurrent UTI, or if they had a perianal fistula or even a perianal fistula repair. Any of those high-risk patients will still give them some antibiotics.
Now we're getting ready for the biopsy. I have the nurses mix up the lidocaine. I borrowed this from Matt here, but we do a combination of 1% lidocaine mixed with basically an equivalent amount of normal saline. It comes out to about a half percent of lidocaine with some sodium bicarb to take off the acidity of the lidocaine. I do a skin block.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
Real quick. I'm going to pause there for just a second. 20mL of 1% lidocaine, 20mL of saline, 20mL of bicarb, is that right? For a 60 milliliter total mixer?
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
Yes. I think it's actually more like 28mL of normal saline, 28mL of lidocaine 1% and then 4 CCs of the sodium bicarb to make a total solution of about 60 ccs.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
What type of needles do you have when you're ready to do your blocking and so forth? 30 gauge needle for a superficial skin wheel, and where are you doing these?
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
I use the 30 gauge, it's a small needle because I want to make a good wheel here. I use about 10 CCs in the skin bilaterally. Also go a little bit deeper.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
With ten and two o'clock? Three and six o'clock? Where are you putting these in?
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
Ten and two o'clock.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
About a centimeter or so above the rectum, is there a variable if you've got this say it's the perineologic device, typically slot 2, 3, 4 broad guidance. I mean, of course everybody's anatomy is a little bit different.
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
I don't know if there's a right answer, but I can tell you the way that I've taught myself to do it is I look to see where the levator muscle is before I put my block in because that is where the needle is going to go in the skin. It's like roughly two o'clock, but I always put my ultrasound in and then look where the levator is going to be and then it's about 10 or 2, but sometimes it's going to be a little more off in either direction. I don't know, Matt, if you have an opinion about that?
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
It's almost something I almost have to show visually, but he's describing exactly the way I approach it.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
Okay. We do a little wheel and then you maybe, what is it, a three centimeter head towards the later and levator and anesthetize the tract where your next round of anesthesia is going to go?
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
I don't know if you know this, but we recently just switched our spinal needle. Before I was using, I think it may have been a minute, like a 22 spinal needle or something like that, but it was so flimsy. It would dive off in different directions in the perineum. I think we recently switched to either 20 or 18. That kind of stiffer longer spinal needle to just go after the levator and bolus the tract before the muscle in the muscle behind the muscle.
Again, that's something I learned, it's like a plug for the AUA course even though I promise I'm not actually lecturing at it. That's what I learned there and I've used it and it's worthwhile for me.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
We get our blocks in and I don't know if the rest of the listenership would have these concerns, but that was certainly a big first anxiety hurdle for me to get over. I can say in my experience that the patients are doing perfectly fine, of course just like a transect muck or whatever here. Again, you might have somebody that doesn't get perfectly anesthetized and I think you can just add in a little bit more, just inject a little bit more local. Okay, good.
A wheel with a 30-gauge inject some of the track, then get to the levators and that's again going to be your hand movement more kind of right-left than so much of a rotation. Is that correct? Okay, good. We've anesthetized the track. We have gone and either done a fusion with our software or planning on doing a cognitive fusion and now the 14 or 16 gauge metallic sheath needle goes in. Is that right, Matt? Is this what you do?
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
Yes. The precision body, I prefer to call it, is more like a trocar more because the design doesn't have the dimensions of a coaxial needle. It's a 15 gauge trocar with an inner lumen of only 18 gauge. It provides extreme stiffness because you're asking it to shift in these various positions but not bend or sway. The tip is a diamond cut because it's just got to be barely sharp enough to pop through the skin, but once it's deep in the tissue, you don't want it to be like a coaxial needle that has sharp sides to it, because as you're shifting medial to lateral, up and down, you don't want to theoretically be slicing through any tissue and result in a hematoma. That locks into that space. I call it the perineal scruff.
If you have a dog, you grab the dog by the scruff and again, shift it all over. We're anchoring the scruff and we're moving the scruff and gliding over the fascia of the pelvic floor muscles in concert with the probe in the rectum actually distorting the prostate to position your trajectory exactly the way you want to fly into the prostate. That would be a simple way of describing it. It's obviously a little bit more dynamic and it takes a little practice.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
Got it. Ideally, when you get your coaxial trocar in, where do you want the tip of that trocar to be?
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
You don't want it to be in the muscle, you want it to be in the subq tissue, but the track that Juan describes from the skin to the pelvic floor, you're creating a lidocaine tunnel. The access trocar sits in the lidocaine tunnel and shifts in any position. You don't want the needle to be in the muscle. It's going to lock it and could potentially do some damage, I would predict, but just sitting there probably, it varies from patient to patient based on perennial thickness, but it's going to be a few CMs from the pelvic floor.
That's really useful real estate because that's like you're flying your plane into the prostate, you use that little bit of space to use the bevel of your needle and glide into the prostate. Unlike transrectal, which is once you commit, I mean, as soon as the biopsy needle exits the needle guide on transrectal, you're committed to tissue, but not with this. With this, you have the opportunity to visualize your trajectory and say, "Okay, I'm going a little lateral, I'm going a little anterior." Then you add a little secondary hand motion and anchor in the capsule at the right location.
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
I think this is where there's probably differences in attachments, which is where I think Aditya is talking about. The nice thing about the precision point of the perennial logic is the trocar needle is hubbed with the skin. When the needle comes out, you can see the tip of it right at the edge of the ultrasound sometimes. I think that that is the point that Aditya is asking about is that we actually use a much longer metal needle sheath. It's about 13.8 centimeters.
Again, I had gone through several iterations to see what was the appropriate needle length or biopsy needle sheath that I needed to use. Our needle tip, the trocar needle, it's just the tip of the ultrasound because if it's in too far, you can't shift up and down. If it's out too far then you're out of the skin. The way that the precision point's set up, it's perfectly in place because its hubs are so close.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
Okay. It sounds like no matter how you get there, that needle right at the tip of the ultrasound is what we're shooting for. Is that about right, Matt?
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
Yes, and Juan brought up a good point that I try to teach people. I've always used the 20-gauge, six-inch spinal needle for the very reason that Juan brought up because the 22, which is what we use for transrectal, it's so flimsy. It's flying all over the place and sometimes you lose track of it. We're now doing a cadaveric dissection to show in great, great detail exactly what we're trying to accomplish with the block. Because I think there's some misconceptions out there. They talk about the subapical triangle. That's confusing, Juan, isn't it? It's almost suggesting that the block is done right under the urethra. You're doing a space ore.
I actually used to include that part in my block, but now I only do it if I need it. I do what's called a tap test. Before I start my biopsy, I divide the prostate into four quadrants, it's called a tap test. The patient's laying there and you're watching their eyes and you mimic with your spinal needle, you mimic where you're going to go with your biopsy needle and you tap the pelvic floor. Right posterior quadrant, I tap medial and then I come out and tap lateral, don't say anything to the patient, you just watch their eyes, and the eyes never lie.
If they feel any pain, they can't hide it because transperineal cannot be done without a proper block. Transrectal can, I did almost my whole career, I pretty much did half of my biopsies without any local because they don't feel pain. I do the tap test and then if they feel something on the tap test, then I already have my spinal with the lidocaine and just add a little and then wait a minute and then recheck the tap test. Plus that also gets you comfortable with the anatomy to see how you're flying in and check your alignment and make sure you're pointing, shooting correctly.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
Yes, that's great I think you're ready to go, right? You can assess things with a relatively smaller gauge needle and re-anesthetize or anesthetize further, should it be required. I actually spoke to Juan about this just last week. One of my earlier ones I actually had difficulty visualizing the prostate on one of the hemiprostates and he had a couple of good pieces of advice that it's always absolutely mandatory to do a rectal exam. You could have some residual stool in there that can obscure the imaging, make sure that you have plenty of lubricant between the cover or sterile condom or whatever you may use and the probe and then also a significant amount between the probe and the rectal wall. I think Juan's adopted a technique of actually injecting a lidocaine jelly syringe just to really maximize the amount of lube because some of the anatomy, I feel like seeing that little slip of muscle lateral to the apex can be a little bit more nuanced than transrectal. Any tips and tricks in that department, Matt?
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
Yes, we call that the rectal slurry. What I do is I stopped doing enemas. Okay, completely. I've never regretted it. Now one out of 50 cases, you got that guy, he's loaded with poop. That's a disaster. Okay, but maybe 1 in 50, 1 in 60. For those I actually just do a dam lavage with a 60 cc catheter tip syringe and just go to town. Because if you can't see what you're doing, you're just going to struggle.
The enemas don't really help that much in my opinion. I think Juan's got a great idea. If the guy's got a history of constipation, if he'll admit to it, then maybe I should do that. Now I don't put the rectal slurry in every time. What I do is I go in with the probe first and if I've got a beautiful look and I can push my probe parallel to the floor and straight down and still see the prostate, I'm good. Just get started. If there's a bit more stool in the way, then I pull the rectal slurry, which is about 40 ccs, and squirter in there and it pushes the poop out of the way. Rectal gas, now that's going to make your experience really frustrating. I find that the guys with enemas, if anything, had more gas. Gas is a killer. I always keep an 18-front red rubber catheter in the room. I don't open it for every case. We call this “fracking for gas”. I like it because it's controversial, fracking for natural gas. It sticks with people.
You take your probe out, you stick the red rubber catheter in the rectum and then you put your probe in underneath the red rubber catheter and you can see it on your axial array. Then use the tip of your probe to steer that red rubber catheter into the gas pocket to the actual gas. You're putting it through the poop, which is the shale rock and you're depositing it in the gas pocket of natural gas and venting it and you can actually hear an audible when you're done too. It's like, "Yes."
Then leave your probe in and then slide the red rubber out and deposit it on a chuck that I place underneath the patient on the floor because you're going to get lube, some blood, some other nasty stuff and to make your turnover of the room faster, keep a little chuck on the floor and lay the catheter on the chuck because sometimes these gassy fellas gas will re-present, especially in the cases you're doing in the afternoon. I find out that the gas load is nasty. I'm a urologist, I like urine, but I don't like this stuff. The afternoon is where you probably need the catheter a little bit more than the morning cases.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
All right, hey, I think that does show that there are some tips and tricks that all of us can take away, but definitely super helpful just to maximize getting a good look at the prostate, which is kind of what the whole experience has preceded on. Okay, so we've got it in anesthetized. We've got our trocar in at the tip of the probe and I do want to be respectful of everybody's time here as we approach an hour, but essentially different styles out there, but a little bit of a different way to think about the prostate more anterior, mid, posterior, lateral medial and then if they've got a longer prostate, a bit more work to get to the base. Are those your basic mapping biopsies plus targets?
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
Yes, going back to our original way that we were doing it and how we've evolved over time. Originally the way that our program was doing this transperineal, it was just a straight U-shaped medial-lateral layer tier, medial-lateral mid-halfway through the prostate medial, lateral posterior. As I was starting to do more of them, I followed it and then I was starting to look at my outcomes and I was like, there's something off here. Then I just realized that I think I'm missing the base of the prostate. Then I started looking at all these different types of templates because there's really no agreed template. It's basically what people have talked about in their experience.
Now what I do and what I have the nurses set up for is a 16-systematic template biopsy where we do that standard U-shape configuration. Then I watch the needle in real-time and I determine am I getting all the way to the base of the prostate to capture the base of the peripheral zone? If I don't feel that I am, or if I'm a little unhappy with posterior biopsies, then I'll do those extra four cores.
Then for the ROI, I do basically the UCLA penumbra where basically one or two in the middle of the lesion, then just the shadow of the lesion with another total of four biopsies. That's the way we do them. I generally try to do the ROI first, in case you do get one of those hematomas that blocks your visualization. I've had one really bad pelvic hematoma I think in the 200 that I've done. Outside of that, that's my basic system for doing them.
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
This discussion of templates I think unfortunately would require more time than we have because this is where the wild west is. You've got a lot of gunslingers out there doing transperineal and we really haven't agreed on what's ideal. For me, as I tried to pioneer this, I can't screw this up. What I did was I used the grid saturation data to guide me initially. Those are the ones with the grid stepper, taking 50, 60 course craziness, but that's always considered like in the PROMISE trial, that was the gold standard on not missing cancer.
We started looking at all these different templates, Ginsburg, this preceded music and all that and the U-shaped thing. Ginsburg was a good one. It's almost like a modified barzel. Then we just started tweaking. We went from Rosen columns to sectors. What we found little known to us, there was an Italian researcher running the same play. We both were like, "What is the sweet spot?” How can I get the best cancer detection with the least amount of core? What is that number now? I'm talking about no MRI. You've got no MRI, you just got a clinical suspicion. The number was 20. Dr. Pepe in Italy does exactly 20. Now everybody looks at me and they're like, "Oh man, you're crazy. That's too many cores." I think you have to bespoke it a little bit and look like Juan said, you just have to watch how you're flying in and appreciate where did I hit and where did I not hit.
I do think that we've got to get this template thing organized. We've got to come to some understanding because if transperineal does not increase complications with more cores and the patient tolerates more cores, why not grab a core between the ten and two o'clock position anterior because actually, we find a lot of cancer anterior medial Ginsburg template, which is the one used in Europe. It includes that area too. I always grab samples in that area. Again, it's a long discussion.
I think the most challenging thing for urologists is transitioning from transrectal to transperineal. It doesn't match. They take their little box with their jars and they're like, "Well, okay, which one's apex medial then?" It's apples and oranges. You've got to rethink the whole template, and that's where it comes to reading your music. I think you should pick a template that's good.
In the MRI world, I think we can adjust the systematic sampling, but even there, it's a little bit wild west right now. My goal is that every patient comes in and I can look them straight in the face and say, "I sampled that prostate and if there's something there, I found it." I think the overall cancer detection should be about 70%. That includes all PI-RADS, all players, and I think it should average about 55% clinically significant if your template is done properly. That's what I've found. That's based on, I've done over 2,500 cases myself, I've participated in up to 5,000 total, and I've looked at data that's made me just quite sick to my stomach, so many cores of data. This is an exciting area and I think you guys being at the academic level can really contribute to this aspect of the whole biopsy.
(8) Takeaways: the Value of Transperineal Biopsies
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
Well, I appreciate that. It's nice when we start moving from fundamentals, I suppose, to refinement. Absolutely, a lot of very intelligent, experienced people are working on this. Yourself included. Well, hey, maybe I'll start out as we wrap up here, parting thoughts with the listenership. Again, I finished my training in 2016, so blink of an eye, I'm in year seven. To be perfectly candid, it was intimidating.
Ultimately, I did believe that there's a lot of value, primarily from a safety perspective, and then also potentially from a diagnostics perspective. I think with some support from your colleagues, it's quite feasible to start doing this. In my early experience, there's nothing catastrophic that's dissuaded me. I'll start with that and maybe we could have a thought from each of you, Juan and Matt, as we conclude.
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
My concluding thought here is that we work many times in isolation. I was doing the biopsies in the basement of the OR for a year, never having actually really interacted with anybody else doing them. Then I went back to interact with all these people at AUA. You can learn a lot. I would continue to revisit the way that you're doing the biopsies to see what else you can learn from other peoples to see if there's an opportunity for you to improve your outcomes. That would be my suggestion. Work in isolation, get your technique better, and then just go back and relearn it again from somebody else, or learn other ways you can improve yourself.
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
I would say that transperineal, obviously I've committed this chunk of my life to this purpose of evangelizing this whole movement of sorts, but if we look at the experience we had in the UK, the UK, they were doing all grid-based in the operating theater under general. We came in there with some fresh new ideas, and now 80% of all the prostate biopsies last year were done this way, this precision point methodology in the clinic setting, and roughly 20% are done by nurse practitioners.
We're starting to train in the US with nurse practitioners. We can do it. We're trying to make biopsies fun again. It's fun. It's rewarding, it's satisfying, it's the future. The guidelines are shifting. They've already shifted in Europe. Time to jump in. It's not as sexy as robotic prostatectomy, but in many ways, that's how that became successful. Like-minded people got together, started talking about different techniques, different nuances, and the field just completely shifted to that robotic movement. I think we've got a lot more obstacles in the way than the robotic movement, but I can't tell you the momentum that's growing out there. It's really palpable. It's very exciting. Thanks to gentlemen like yourself at the academic level, because the dude from Cumberland, Maryland, he's tainted. He's industry, wears different hats. You guys are the ones to do it. Thank you.
[Dr. Aditya Bagrodia]
Well, hey, Matt, Juan, thanks again for offering your experience, your insight, your candor about the whole process. I think in the 21st century we all recognize that, one, you've got to evolve with the times, and two, it takes a village. I don't think industry is evil and we're all holier than thou. It's a total team-based approach. As long as everybody's moving in the right direction trying to help out patients, the future is bright. All right, guys, have a wonderful evening. Thank you again.
[Dr. Matt Allaway]
Thank you very much.
[Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges]
Thanks.
Podcast Contributors
Dr. Matthew Allaway
Dr. Matthew Allaway is a practicing urologist at Urology Associates in Cumberland and the founder and CEO of Perineologic.
Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges
Dr. Juan Javier-DesLoges is a urologic oncologist at UC San Diego in California.
Dr. Aditya Bagrodia
Dr. Aditya Bagrodia is an associate professor of urology and genitourinary oncology team leader at UC San Diego Health in California and adjunct professor of urology at UT Southwestern.
Cite This Podcast
BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2023, May 3). Ep. 96 – Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Practical Startup Guide [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com
Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.