BackTable / VI / Article
Planning for HCC Radiation Segmentectomy: Mapping, Margins & Dosage
Jack Felkner • Updated Dec 3, 2024 • 40 hits
Radiation segmentectomy is an advanced, minimally invasive treatment modality used to manage primary hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic liver tumors, particularly in cases where surgical resection is not feasible due to tumor location or underlying liver dysfunction. Performing radiation segmentectomy involves extensive planning and attention to detail to deliver an effective dose of radiation to the tumor while minimizing damage to healthy liver parenchyma.
Interventional radiologists Dr. Tyler Sandow and Dr. Juan Jimenez explain how they plan for HCC radiation segmentectomy, detailing their approach to pre-operative mapping using cone beam CT, how to determine radiation margins, calculating the appropriate radiation dosage, and when to incorporate subsegmentectomy techniques. This article features transcripts for the BackTable Podcast. We’ve provided the highlight reel here, and you can listen to the full podcast below.
The BackTable Brief
• High specific activity, selective mapping, and a "big-to-small" approach in radiation segmentectomy are essential to ensure complete tumor coverage, minimize liver toxicity, and reduce complications.
• Cone beam CT, rather than traditional cross-sectional imaging, is the optimal imaging choice to accurately map and confirm complete tumor coverage in radiation segmentectomy.
• While they generally aim for a baseline dose of 400 gray in radiation segmentectomy, Dr. Sandow and Dr. Jimenez may escalate to higher doses (up to 1,200 gray for small volumes) when needed, with careful consideration given to proximity to sensitive structures like the porta hepatis, while adhering to consensus guidelines.
• In treating centrally located tumors with multiple feeders, the team prioritizes precise mapping using cone beam imaging, selective feeder targeting, and subsegmentectomy techniques to deliver high doses to the tumor while minimizing liver exposure. This is especially important in complex cases with extrahepatic feeders, where careful radiation control is key to preventing complications like radiation burns or bowel damage.
Table of Contents
(1) Tumor Mapping & Margins in HCC Radiation Segmentectomy
(2) Cone Beam CT for Navigation & Volume Calculations
(3) Determining Dosage in HCC Radiation Segmentectomy
(4) Addressing Large, Central Tumors with Radiation Segmentectomy
Tumor Mapping & Margins in HCC Radiation Segmentectomy
Success with radiation segmentectomy hinges on precise identification of tumor feeders through detailed mapping and a "big-to-small" vessel selection approach. By prioritizing selectivity and complete tumor coverage, operators can avoid missing critical areas, which often occurs when focusing too narrowly on individual vessels. Dr. Jimenez and Dr. Sandow emphasize the importance of Cone beam CT for assessing tumor enhancement and ensuring accurate treatment.
[Dr. Juan Gimenez]
High specific activity matters. We do believe that. The only way to do that is to treat as close to day-of calibration, which is on the same day as you can. The problem with that is with increased specific activity, your dose goes up too. Then you have to make sure that you minimize adverse events. The only way that you can minimize adverse events is by treating as small an amount of liver as possible to take care of the tumor. Otherwise, you're going to end up with a lot of specific activity, a high dose in a big volume.
That's what's been shown in all the studies like Target, for example. Beau has some articles too showing that it's about the size, the amount of normal liver that you treat that results in complications not necessarily the dose. When you put all of that together then you're basically left out as we need activity, we need dose, we've got to stay safe. The only way to achieve all those three is by getting as selective as you can. Then you have to go fish all these little vessels out to a point as to you've got to do all these things, your mapping has to take five hours.
We boil down our technique, literally – it's not ours. There's three papers that pretty much summarize everything that we do, and it's not my idea. Like I said, I'm not that smart, but I'm a great copycat. No, for real. One of them is Ran Gabas paper. There's an ACR Society of Nuclear Medicine consensus paper, and then there are the consensus guidelines for dosimetry where the most one updated one is from 2022. Basically, those three papers together are what we use.
Mapping is simple. If you just think of what the purpose of the mapping is then you can understand what it is that you need to do to get it right. Basically, the purpose of a map is to identify all tumor feeders, vessels that are going outside the liver, any potential extrapolate supply. With that being said, literally ours is a protocol. You have to-- always start by reviewing your imaging and try to identify any variant anatomy. Then stick to it. Power runs, heat. No matter how strong you are, you're not going to be able to inject five for thirty. You can't do that. Power runs. Start with the celiac. If needed, do an SMA and then go from big to small, either common or proper hepatic.
Do we do this for absolutely every treatment? No. If you only have left-sided tumors, yes, just into the left. If it's only right, right. If you somebody between segment IV or segment Va you have to interrogate both the left and the right because invariably you will have feeders from both.
Then cone beam. Cone-beam CT is the main state of our practice. Again, it's the same concept. Start big. Do a lower and then get smaller. Start getting selective and more selective until you make sure that you get what you need.
What people are going to say, Y90 don't work or have a residual. Wherever you deposit the radiation, it will kill that tissue. Whether it's liver, stomach, heart, esophagus, it doesn't matter. If it goes in there, you're going to end up with a hole. Whenever you have some leftover or some residual, it's not because the radiation didn't work. It's because you didn't put radiation there. That's why the concept of do a lower spin and then get smaller and make sure you have complete coverage is extremely important.
I will tell you, we use a lot of 2.0 French microcatheter so the liver -- a lot of times, we will not select those arteries you're mapping because they can get spasm or they can get dissected, and then you're not going to be able to treat. You have to be able to identify knowing that that will introduce an unknown at the time of delivery because you may have to spend a little bit of time but then identify everything. You may have bilobar disease, take the time to do it and just follow that big-to-small approach.
If you're on the right lobe, start with the right, come in on the right, anterior division, posterior division, Va, VI, VII, and cone-beam, all of those things, and get smaller. Then, I would say, take your time to look and be very objective about the images. Don't let your ego get in the way. That's how you end up missing things. I would say, take the time to write a mapping even when you have to select and interrogate a lot of vessels. If you do it that way, it will take you at most two hours.
Now, when a mapping takes four to five hours, and when you do the complete opposite, so when you say, "Oh, that solution is segment II. I'm going to go to segment II," and then you don't see anything. Then you start backtracking and backtracking and basically, you end up higher radiation doses, more time, more spins, more of everything. Start big and go small. It saves you time, literally. Everybody that comes through our practice, all of our trainees, that's how we tell them how to do it, and if you, ourselves included, deviate from that, we pay the price for it.
Then just come up with a treatment plan. Do it all at once and then decide. If you know that you have to treat four or five vessels, sometimes, yes, it'll be easy. That can take you about an hour. If you're sub-selecting multiple tiny branches, two of French, very tortuous anatomy, divide it. Just do two at a time. Don't get mentally exhausted and then give up. Just do two, bring them back two weeks later, do the other two, and then just get your imaging. We've learned from our own mistakes to say that our technique has evolved significantly since we first started doing this.
As of today, I can tell you that's what works best for us, and that's what's allowed us to replicate the results of, so like Tyler likes to call them the Y90 giants and I agree with him, all of these guys, but it's just having-- being very methodical and paying a lot of attention to detail.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
There's a lot of questions that I wanted to dig in on that. One of the things that strikes me is complete coverage of tumor. If you're going and sub-selecting each vessel, the way I think about it like on ablation is you want to hit the tumor. You also want to hit the margins around the tumor. Is that a consideration whenever you're treating?
[Dr. Juan Gimenez]
Yes, you'll always have a margin. Unlike, I would say, ablation, which you can get very just a tumor when you ablate that space if you want, if you think of vascular territories there, you're always going to be angiosomes-- that's a term Beau likes to use-- and triangular in shape. You're always going to have a little bit of a margin. We see the biggest issue is you miss part of the tumor and so–
I'm not talking about a centimeter. It's a couple of millimeters. That's where the lobar cone-beam is so important because on that lobar cone-beam it has multiple thing. You can see the entire enhancement, part of that tumor. If you get too selective and you miss something, also, if you do a right lobar and you didn't see complete enhancement, that you may have to go to the left or you have a phrenic or something else going in there that you have to look for, that's where the issue comes.
You're always going to get a margin no matter how selective you are, at least that's been our experience because there's always a little bit of normal tissue. The most important thing is the more selective you get you may just stop isolating other branches and maybe supply that you may miss. I can tell you, it's very easy to do if you just go straight to a vessel and you see a nice, round enhancement area like, "Oh, I got it all," and then you go look back and I'm like, "Oh, yes. I guess, I missed this little edge." That's it.
Listen to the Full Podcast
Stay Up To Date
Follow:
Subscribe:
Sign Up:
Cone Beam CT for Navigation & Volume Calculations
Cone beam CT has become an essential tool in radiation segmentectomy. Dr. Sandow and Dr. Jimenez now use cone beam CT alongside traditional imaging to guide treatment planning and confirm complete tumor coverage during the procedure. Overlaying segmental and subsegmental cone beam images after mapping helps verify that all tumor feeders are addressed, reducing the risk of missed areas. The integration of navigation software like Siemens EmboGuide further improves feeder selection and catheter placement, though cone beam CT remains essential for confirming coverage.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Do you guys use any of the software, the software like OncoSuite that helps you select the feeders or–
[Dr. Tyler Sandow]
To select feeders? No. We have navigation software with Siemens, like EmboGuide. We don't use it routinely. I will say to plug one on this cone beam CT thing-- he's a big advocate for lobar cone beam. What he does, and I think we all should do, he goes back after his mappings and will confirm that he completely covered the tumor in the same way with all of his segmental or sub-segmental cone beams. He will confirm that he had complete coverage of the tumor. He actually overlays them to make sure that he had everything laid out well. I think that's the only way to make sure that you covered it and you aren't going to be surprised about any bad responses or suboptimal responses. We do use dosimetry software though.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Before we get to the dosimetry software, which I do want to talk about, I wanted to talk about how you guys calculate your volumes or the volumes of tumor treated are based off. Do you use it off the old cross-sectional or can you just calculate it off the cone beam?
[Dr. Tyler Sandow]
We love to use cone beam.
[Dr. Juan Gimenez]
Yes, cone beam.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Cone beam?
[Dr. Juan Gimenez]
Everything straight from cone beam.
Determining Dosage in HCC Radiation Segmentectomy
In radiation segmentectomy, the goal is to deliver an effective dose to tumor volumes while minimizing exposure to surrounding tissues to prevent complications. Key to this technique is understanding the relationship between dose, volume, and safety, especially when treating tumors near sensitive structures like the porta hepatis or bile ducts. In Dr. Sandow and Dr. Jimenez’s practice, the standard dose is typically 250-300 gray, though higher doses up to 1,200 gray may be used for small volumes of tissue. The principle of "dead is dead" suggests that once the tumor is sufficiently irradiated to necrose, increasing the dose further does not improve outcomes.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
We've talked about it in a roundabout way as far as you guys try and get selective as possible, high dose matters like as far as hitting 400 gray. Can you get a little bit more specific about when you're ordering your dose? You already know the volume that you're going to be treating, you want to minimize or keep the volumes as low as possible. When you're dosing these patients, you care necessarily if it's 500 gray, 600 gray, or you just try and pick a vial that is going to be above 400?
[Dr. Tyler Sandow]
Dead is dead.
[Dr. Juan Gimenez]
I would say our baseline is 400s. There's a little bit of caveats to that, but we've gone as high as over 1,000 gray to perfuse volumes and tumors. Granted, small volumes, putting 1,000 gray in a 300 to 400cc volume, that's dangerous. Small volumes, yes. The biggest caveat that we noticed that we try to be careful is close to a porta hepatis and that common bile duct because you may get some issues with the bile duct and then you end up with strictures and they need biliary drain. I would say close to the hilum, be a little bit careful. If you're peripheral, right there next to the gallbladder doesn't matter.
Tyler has a case, like you showed, so 1200 gray, segment V, right there next gallbladder, and nothing happened to it. We've done it next to the colon, next to the stomach. We have not seen any complications from the procedure itself. It's not an issue for transplant according to our transplant surgeon. We have been told sometimes if you're going to go to resection, not necessarily transplant, there may be some adhesions that may make the operation a bit more complex. We'll just say 400.
We do follow the dosing recommendations from the consensus guidelines. If you look through all of those, and most of this comes from a dosing sphere, they'll tell you that you need to put at least 205 to tumor, preferably 250 to 300. We try to follow that as our lower end of radiation. We cannot get that much into tumor, then we might have to switch to a different modality. Using 200, even close to that porta hepatis region has been safe for us.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Does this mean everyone is Week 1, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday treatment, or virtually–
[Dr. Tyler Sandow]
Just about. Now, we will occasionally – if you're treating really small volumes like, let's say, if you're only treating 25 mLs worth of volume and you put in the smallest file size you can get as a 350q, and you're going to put that in 25 mLs worth of tissue, that's going to be close to – I'm trying to spitball. I think it's 1,200 gray. Now, talking to people, and you never know who you're talking to about this, 1,200 gray can make people nervous because they just associate gray with, "Oh, that's too hot. I'm going to cook my hands on it," or something. Granted, dead is dead. If it was going to be dead at 400, it's going to be dead at 1,200. Really, dead is dead.
I like to come back to that whenever we're talking about radiation delivery. Occasionally, rarely, we'll deviate into a Week 2 Monday, especially if it's a small volume and we want to keep our radiation in the porta hepatis region. We want to keep our actual gray low in the 250, 200 range. We'll deviate a little bit. I would say, again, 90% to 95% of our deliveries are in that Week one, Wednesday to Friday range.
Addressing Large, Central Tumors with Radiation Segmentectomy
A subsegmentectomy approach is often used for larger tumors, allowing for higher doses to the tumor while sparing healthy tissue. However, careful radiation control is needed to avoid complications like radiation burns or bowel damage, using techniques like selective infusion and slow dosing. For patients with underlying liver disease, monitoring bilirubin and albumin levels is key, and segmentectomy volumes should be limited to under 20% of total liver volume, with split doses for larger treatments to reduce liver decompensation risks.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
There's another scenario that I wanted to get at. Some of what we talked about is the tumors that you can just dunk all over like the ones where you can achieve a 25 ml volume. What about if you have a centrally located, maybe away from the porta hepatis, but big tumor, centrally located, multiple feeders, how do you tackle it?
[Dr. Tyler Sandow]
We are cone beam crazy. Our team expects us to do cone beams. We go in there with the anticipation to get-- we will cover every possible feeder. I think there's multiple ways to do this. I don't disagree with the philosophies. Our practice, we want to make it subsegmentectomy because we know that if we can maximize dose to tumor and limit dose to normal, we have a better opportunity to come back on the backend. If we don't perfuse the whole liver with dose, even though the majority of it might get sucked up into tumor, we have an opportunity. In an 8, 9-centimeter tumor, we might be coming back to retreat them.
I think another school of thought is to do a larger volume. Knowing that the tumor is going to soak up the majority of the tumor, you can either do a partition or multicompartment dosimetry for it or you just do a lobar dose maybe at 200, 150 gray knowing the tumor is going to take a dramatic more amount of those spheres. You're probably going to be coming back.
I think both ways hold merit, but our practice is we will select every feeder. If it's seven feeders, we'll do it. That's the detail that I think we like to push for because we're competing with surg onc for cases. I shouldn't say we compete. We share cases, and we do what's best for patients. In the real world, surg onc they're going to take the time to dissect out and make sure that they carve a margin on a tumor. Those cases might take some time. I feel like if we're trying to produce the same results as our colleagues in other specialties, we owe it to the patients to spend that much time trying to select this stuff out.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
How about tough locations? We talked about centrally-located tumors, but what about tumors that are wherever they are, they end up having some extrahepatic feeders. How do you guys deal with that?
[Dr. Juan Gimenez]
We map them out and then it goes back to the same. You got to understand what you're dealing with. Have we done extrahepatic? Yes. We've done a couple of phrenics, adrenals, even gastric branches, GDA branches, Tyler has done] splenic branches. The key thing there is just to make sure that you can control where the radiation is going to go, so the liver is low. That might be one of the instances, if we're doing an extrahepatic, that we may put the MAA there just to be 100% sure that we don't have any distribution that we may not be able to account for. Then we infuse a little bit slower and we dose a little bit lower.
I would just tell you with anything that may be going to bowel, the number one thing is just to make sure that you're not going to get anything in the bowel. You can still go pretty high. With some of the other things that may be going to skin and diaphragm, particularly skin, you have to be careful because you may cause radiation burns, and they may end up getting wounds and things like that.
I think the spin case reports of people inadvertently putting Y90 into a falciform artery and they end up with skin burns. Tone it down, making sure that you understand where everything is going to go, and try to get selective. You'll see even with some of these phrenic branches that sometimes it'll be one dominant one that'll just go to tumor. Get into that.
I would say treat everything that it's fed by the liver first just because that's going to be safe. Sometimes you'll get a little bit of an expected result from that extrahepatic. Fortunately, you'll see that some of that will respond to treatment. Can't really explain why, but I've had that happen. Always treat the liver first and then just take the time to analyze. If you're going to hurt skin, taste, maybe you can ablate that component. Be open to other things. You can do it. It's just you have to pay attention. I would say don't go trying to do that on your first case or your first 10, 20 cases. Maybe give yourself a little bit of time to get comfortable with everything.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Get your chutzpah. Is coiling a part of your practice for the mapping part of the procedure if you're trying to redistribute flow or just exclude branches that you're not sure if you're going to get reflux into?
[Dr. Juan Gimenez]
I would say for reflux purposes, no. If we have to, we'll just get more split doses. Now redistribution is a concept that I understand. I think it works great for some people. I have not been successful at making it work the way I want it where it is reproducible every time, so I don't use it. I don't do it for that.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Tyler?
[Dr. Tyler Sandow]
I have a technique called the Sandow spasm. Sometimes it happens in the tumor vessel, sometimes it happens in the normal vessel. What I try to do is I always try to – if I want to redistribute flow, I try to spasm the normal vessel. It works sometimes, it doesn't work other times, and sometimes what'll happen is I'll spend a couple minutes trying to spasm a normal vessel and gently select the tumor vessel and the tumor vessel shuts down on me and the normal vessel looks beautiful. We'll play with that. Same kind of concept as Juan. I'll occasionally coil. If it's a falciform artery or something and it's huge, I'll coil. I really love putting ice packs around people's belly button. That's my thing.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Fair enough. Let's see. Is there anything that I didn't cover in terms of y'all's mapping, treatment, dosimetry? We talked a little bit about unicompartment and multicompartment. I feel like y'all reference multicompartment a couple of times, but I think you said earlier that 95% of the time you're doing unicompartment.
[Dr. Juan Gimenez]
Yes, it's just because we're doing multiple segmentectomies. It's easiest to a point. The biggest thing with multicompartment dosimetry is that you need very good distribution of your MAA. For whatever reason it clumped or something happened and it's clutchy and it doesn't correlate with tumors, you can't use it.
We just say if we have somebody that has those multiple tumors everywhere, and then you're looking at doing a lobar or a pretty large liver and you know you may have to come back, then yes, definitely doing multicompartment. Rather than dosing to tumor, dosing to normal parenchyma to stay safe, then that's when we would use it. The majority of our cases truly tend to be either advanced or bigger tumors. We get segmentectomy. Everything is just teasing out as much as we can and delivering into a smaller volume.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Speaking of tough scenarios, as far as underlying liver disease, do you guys have a cutoff for how much volume you want to preserve depending on their Child-Pugh A, B, and C, or each patient is individual and you just have to case-by-case basis?
[Dr. Tyler Sandow]
I think we look at it on a case-by-case basis in a situational basis. I think if we know that we always have transplant as a background option for the patient, we feel more comfortable being aggressive because we know that should we run into problems, we do have an option for liver failure should we progress. Juan, I should say, he pushes this on everybody. We look at bilirubin and a trend in bilirubin more so than we look at a number and we use direct bilirubin too. If someone comes in and it's not just about their Child-Pugh class, but we pay more attention to albumin and bilirubin independently, one as an anticipation for outcomes and one as an anticipation for adverse events.
Bilirubin is our key metric for adverse events. If they come in with the bilirubin that is 1.5, most people would say if it's a small segmentectomy, we're going to do fine, but if the bilirubin was 0.5 three weeks ago, we might pay a little bit more close attention to that or closer attention to that because they're in a trend of liver decompensation. We don't want to be the kick into a full-on liver failure so we look at trends. I should say we follow the data.
Beau has published a great paper talking about patients with compensated liver function. You don't really have to pay attention to volume. In patients with some underlying liver dysfunction, ALBI2s, Child-Pugh Bs, you need to be treating less than 15% of the total liver. That's where we are. We try to keep the total volume of liver that we treat with segmentectomies in just about anyone, normal, normal abnormal, less than 20% for anyone if it's going to be a segmentectomy dose. We'll split. If it's going to be more than 20%, we'll split doses, we'll bring them back, and maybe treat another, maybe get 15%, 20%, and then bring them back and treat a little bit more. Make sure that the liver is holding steady.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
How far do you wait between treatments?
[Dr. Tyler Sandow]
Three to four weeks. 2, 3, 4 weeks. We'll get a bilirubin at whatever that midpoint is because that's another metric in time, and then we get a bilirubin on the day of treatment. As long as those are holding steady, then we know we're pretty good. Obviously, in patients with liver dysfunction, we don't want to treat more than 15% and we'll try to treat even less than that. Again, why subsegmentectomies have really worked for us because our treatment volumes are so small compared to the total liver volume that we can get away with a lot.
Podcast Contributors
Dr. Juan Gimenez
Dr. Juan Gimenez is an interventional and diagnostic radiologist with Ochsner Health in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Dr. Tyler Sandow
Dr. Tyler Sandow is an interventional radiologist with Ochsner Health in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Dr. Christopher Beck
Dr. Chris Beck is a practicing interventional radiologist with Regional Radiology Group in New Orleans.
Cite This Podcast
BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2023, October 27). Ep. 379 – Management of HCC: Focus on Radiation Segmentectomy Part 2 [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com
Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.