BackTable / VI / Article
TIPS Placement: Treating Portal Hypertension in the Outpatient Setting

#NUM!
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement is a cornerstone intervention in the management of complications associated with portal hypertension. By reducing portal venous pressure, TIPS can provide significant clinical relief from conditions such as refractory ascites, hepatic hydrothorax, and variceal bleeding. In this article, hepatologist Dr. Tom Leventhal and interventional radiologist Dr. Siobhan Flanagan share their insights regarding TIPS placement, including how patients are selected for TIPS, approaches to the procedure, and post-procedure management in the outpatient setting. This article includes key excerpts from the BackTable Podcast. We've compiled a highlight reel for quick insights, and the full podcast is available below for deeper exploration.
The BackTable Brief
• TIPS placement is an effective intervention for managing complications of portal hypertension, including refractory ascites, hepatic hydrothorax, and variceal bleeding.
• TIPS placement can be done in the outpatient setting in some cases.
• Patient selection for outpatient TIPS involves assessing MELD scores (generally <20), ruling out contraindications like right-sided heart failure, assessing the patient’s support system, and considering the patient’s quality of life and symptom burden.
• Dr. Flanagan primarily uses the Rösch-Uchida TIPS set, incorporating intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in complex cases to improve visualization and precision.
• The technical endpoint in TIPS placement is a portosystemic gradient below 12 mmHg. Initial dilation begins at 8 mm, with cautious escalation to 10 mm to minimize the risk of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy.
• Post-procedure care includes a same-day discharge protocol, structured follow-up calls on days one and three, and a one-month IR clinic visit for imaging and lab assessment.
• Close collaboration between IR and hepatology ensures comprehensive care and improved patient outcomes, according to Drs. Flanagan and Levanthal.

Table of Contents
(1) Who Gets TIPS?: Patient Scenarios for TIPS Referral in the Outpatient Setting
(2) Technical Approach to TIPS Placement
(3) TIPS Post-Procedure Pearls in The Outpatient Setting
Who Gets TIPS?: Patient Scenarios for TIPS Referral in the Outpatient Setting
The most common outpatient scenarios leading to TIPS referral include diuretic-refractory ascites and hepatic hydrothorax. These patients often present with symptoms unresponsive to medical management, including frequent paracentesis. Dr. Leventhal notes that the decision to proceed with TIPS depends on a balance of factors, including a low MELD score (generally below 20), the absence of contraindications such as right-sided heart failure, and the potential to improve both symptoms and quality of life. While a liver transplant still remains the ultimate goal for many patients on the transplant list, TIPS can greatly improve quality of life as a bridge to definitive treatment in patients with chronic liver disease. Early discussions between interventional radiology and hepatology teams facilitate timely intervention, improving patient outcomes in Dr. Levanthal’s experience.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Tom, if you could, will you talk about either a patient that may come through your clinic or the transplant clinic and that gets referred over for a TIPS, like a couple of different scenarios that you're like, all right, we should get this patient over to interventional radiology for potential TIPS workup. What patients like end up getting shifted over to IR for potential TIPS?
[Dr. Tom Leventhal]
Are you more interested in say outpatient or inpatient?
[Dr. Chris Beck]
I'll start out without patient outpatient considerations.
[Dr. Tom Leventhal]
Sure. I think the predominant reason that we're making referrals for TIPS is a diuretic refractory ascites or hepatic hydrothorax. I think that, like I said, we're aggressive. I think that with case management for helping to manage these patients requesting that as getting frequent labs, but we know that the natural history of cirrhosis is they'll progress and they're ultimately progressed to where they develop a kidney dysfunction, be a type of hepatorenal syndrome or a consequence or side effect of their diuretics.
I think that once we get to that point, sort of regardless of MELD, if less than 20, we're pretty quick about saying, hey, we've tried this. You're getting your paracentesis at the number of patients that I have in clinic that are getting them weekly, twice weekly. I've had some patients that needed them three times weekly and you can only do so much and we recognize that with patients is that you can recommend these lifestyle modifications of sodium avoidance, but it is what it is. They're human.
I think that it's the refractory ascites or hepatic hydrothorax that really is the big push for us to get these patients into TIPS and, I'll toot Siobhan's horn for her, we do the second most TIPS in the United States and at least that's the urban legend that's going around and I believe it because we're very assertive about referring them and our outcomes and the resolution of ascites or hepatic hydrothorax is very impressive.
Along with that, the improvement in quality of life, the ability for your patient to be more active ultimately I think prolongs life till time to transplant or else just prolongs life and so it makes a really big difference.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
All right, Siobhan, so from your perspective, I guess what I want to know, like one of the questions I have in my head is I can remember being in training, I guess I came out in 2015 and the number of TIPS that we did at the very first half of the year was 10 and the second half of the year, it was 100 and like there was like this quick ramp up and then like I was at Georgetown Transplant Center and then it just never went down, like it was like, up into the right and then leveled off. Do you remember that point in your practice when your TIPS placement went up, like was there an upward trajectory or was it a slow burnup?
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
I think it was a quick change for us and I think it was twofold. Our newer hepatologists really looking to manage their patients' fluid, and that really changed the practice for us, but then also, when Northwestern's data came out on making patients transplant candidates, that really changed things for us as well and I think since then it's just been a steady rise for us in general. I don't think as much as that, 2016 or so, we were a little bit behind you guys, 2016 to early 2017, I really remember that time as being a transition point for us doing more and more TIPS.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Tom, would you echo that sentiment that it was some of the data that came out around that time and maybe different hepatologists coming on board and were more interested in getting a little bit more aggressive with fluid management?
[Dr. Tom Leventhal]
I would. Yes, I think that aside, the early study that looked at like early TIPS for, we'll say, even variceal hemorrhage came out in 2010. Then it was like every couple years another big study looking at, inpatient mortality was reduced, things like that and it was like, okay, we know that there are certainly indications where it makes a dramatic difference, but I think then that got broadly applied to say, hey, like we can make a really big difference and understanding that there are people with portal hypertension that don't have high MELDs, but still have significant ascites and significant hepatic hydrothorax. We couldn't always weigh on transplant as being the ultimate, it was the ultimate, but it wasn't necessarily going to be feasible anytime soon if they didn't have access to say a living donor and then this was just a, hey, this is something that works that can prolong life and reduce morbidity without transplant. I think that's why we saw this ramp up.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
One of the things that often gets discussed or has been discussed is like the big push and pull between the benefits of TIPS versus the downsides. Tom, in your mind, what would you say are the top three downsides to a TIPS procedure that in your mind, you're like, this is like the worst situation that can happen post TIPS.
[Dr. Tom Leventhal]
Before you threw in that last sentence, I would have said none.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
All right.
[Dr. Tom Leventhal]
I think they're phenomenal. I just, again, it's just our practice, they just are in so many ways life-changing, right? What we worry about is refractory encephalopathy that leads to an almost comatose state. I've been practicing hepatology eight years. In that time, we talk about this, right? Because it's so rare. I can think of two patients who we actually had to close down the TIPS because of such dense refractory encephalopathy. I've ordered a lot of TIPS and my partners that have been here as long or longer than I have comparable results.
I've seen very few people go into like heart failure, right-sided heart failure because of the increase in preload. I think that's why just uniform our practices, we've got to get an up-to-date echo. We have to make sure that we're at least looking for that risk stratification. Outside of that, I don't even know if I could come up with a third risk that I would really worry about just because of how positive the outcomes overall are.
Listen to the Full Podcast
Stay Up To Date
Follow:
Subscribe:
Sign Up:
Technical Approach to TIPS Placement
Successful TIPS placement requires diligent pre-procedure planning, imaging, and a solid understanding of the patient’s anatomy. Dr. Flanagan commonly uses the Rösch-Uchida TIPS set, with adjunctive devices like the BD Liberty set for recanalization cases. In tougher cases with obese patients or patients with small portal veins, Dr. Flanagan often incorporates intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for enhanced visualization. ICE is particularly helpful in cases with tougher anatomy, providing additional operator confidence and, in some cases, decreasing overall procedure time.
Gradient reduction is the key procedural endpoint, with the ultimate goal being a portosystemic gradient below 12 mmHg. Initial dilation to 8 mm, with cautious progression to 10 mm if necessary, minimizes the risk of post-procedure hepatic encephalopathy, according to Dr. Flanagan.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Walk us through what your TIPS procedure looks like, your most modern version of your TIPS. Like all the things you use or do not use and why.
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
Yes, absolutely. My go-to TIPS set is the Rösch-Uchida. I'm just incredibly comfortable with that thing. Over time, the more recanalization work that we do, BD has its Liberty set which is nice for recanalization patients. If you just have a really, short A to P distance but the long, anterior throw, that device has changed the game for those rare difficult cases. By and large, the Rösch-Uchida is my go-to kit.
As far as the procedure itself, I won't bore everybody with the technical access.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Go ahead.
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
Classic steps that everybody goes through, your hepatic vein catheterization and just ensuring that you're where you think you are. Most of my TIPS are right to right. The use of ICE for us has increased over time. It's not in every case for me, but in Minnesota, we have a different body habitus than maybe California and ICE really can come in handy especially when patients have had a portal occlusion or maybe a very small portal vein that's just, tough to get to. ICE has really changed the games for us in those very difficult cases.
I don't necessarily do the CO2 venogram, I learned to contrast wedge venogram, as long as you've got careful technique that outlines the anatomy really well for me. I would say I'm relying more on the ultrasound these days than, going AP to RAO to send my needle across from my hepatic vein to my portal vein. I think ultrasound, for those who don't use it, get used to using it. It's a great device and it really can get you out of some tricky situations and it just provides a lot of confidence and quickens your procedures, certainly has for me.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Hold on. When you mean ultrasound, are you talking about the transabdominal or intra–
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
ICE. No, ICE.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Oh, okay. Okay.
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
Yes, sorry, ICE. Transabdominal has its role too. I like intracardiac echo, especially for those large obese patients who have, pretty small portal target or we've had to recanalize it. Then from there, it's just my pre-pressures, marking catheter, and then placement of the Viator, pretty garden variety for me. Our recanalization procedures, it all depends on the configuration of the occlusion, what approach we take to reopen it. I like the transplenic approach quite a bit. On occasion, these aren't cirrhotic patients so I'll save a lot of the chatter about this.
On occasion, you need unusual mini-laparotomy approach to get SMV access maybe. By and large, we accomplish our recanalizations with transplenic and maybe adding a transhepatic approach if you just can't quite connect the dots to reopen the vessel to progress on to TIPS. Then completion pressures, we all know that the hepatic venous end is usually the end that we have not quite long enough. It's a little short and that can lead to early reocclusion. I'm usually doing a venogram at the end through my sheath right at that hepatic venous end of the TIPS to make sure, yes, I'm flush up against or very close to that IVC confluence. Pressures get done and then we wrap it up for the day.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
As far as endpoints, what do you use for your pressure measurement goals to say like, okay, this is done, as far as your dilations afterwards or like any tuning up?
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
That's a great question. For me, it's less than 12. If I get it to less than 12, I know I should really help the patient with bleeding and ascites. Initially, my dilation is to 8 millimeters if I, especially for patients who may be at higher risk for encephalopathy. Maybe they have some pre-procedure encephalopathy that wasn't just West Haven grade one. It was more. If the dilation to 8 gets me to that gradient, then I'm done. If I need to dilate from there to achieve that gradient of less than 12, I go to 10. Always in the context of the, of each patient and their risk for encephalopathy.
TIPS Post-Procedure Pearls in The Outpatient Setting
Post-TIPS care is critical for ensuring procedural success and preventing complications. At Dr. Flanagan’s institution, patients are monitored for 4-6 hours in the PACU before same-day discharge. Follow-up care includes check-in calls on days one and three to screen for issues such as encephalopathy and assess recovery progress. Patients are evaluated in the IR clinic at one month post-procedure for imaging and laboratory follow-up. Dr. Flanagan notes that this involvement by the IR team in the patient’s recovery post-procedure promotes improved patient outcomes and better relationships between IR and hepatology teams with minimal disruptions to the patients’ follow-up schedule. Dr. Leventhal notes that proactive coordination with hepatology ensures patients are prepared with necessary medications to address potential complications.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
As far as what happens at the patient's post, you said a lot of your patients now are going home same day?
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
They're going home same day.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Is that relatively new for you guys?
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
We've been doing this for about 18 months now. Our protocol for this is the patient will stay up in the PACU recovery room for about four hours. Some patients who are maybe a little borderline, you're a little more concerned about them, you'll watch them for six. As long as they're doing well after the procedure, they're going home after that observation time.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
They go home same day and then-- so one, I want to, Siobhan, I want to know when they follow up with IR. Then also Tom, I would like to know like what they look like as you guys are starting to pick them up post-TIPS. Siobhan, we'll start with you.
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
Yes, and IR, I see them at one-month post-procedure, but we've got a great nurse clinician support team in IR, and they're calling the patient, day after, we have a day one and a day three call just to make sure that it doesn't sound like they're having issues with encephalopathy early on that maybe they aren't even recognizing. Part of our, setup for our patients when we're meeting them in clinic is to understand what's your social and in-house support at home. Knowing that they've got someone else in the household with them is a more comforting thing than thinking about them being on their own so there's someone to really watch out for any development of encephalopathy as well.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Cool. Do you send them home with any meds for potential encephalopathy treatment? Do they have that going home or, so I've heard some IR docs will get them these prescriptions even before the TIPS goes in or I didn't know if you guys had anything like that in place.
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
Yes. I know Tom can talk to the hepatology side of that that's a desirable thing on our end to have the patient ready with those medications.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Tom, what does it look like from your end?
[Dr. Tom Leventhal]
We made the assessment, they go in for it. I have to say, it's not that you're selling it, right? It's that you're doing the right thing medically, but when you have these discussions with patients in hepatology clinic, how long am I in the hospital after the surgery? To be able to say, no, it's a procedure, it's a day procedure, you'll probably go home the same day, it takes away a lot of reticence that they may have to go through with it, which is huge.
My guess is that the majority of patients that we're referring for TIPS are already on treatment medications for hepatic encephalopathy with either lactulose or rifaximin. Many of them already are. I certainly have had colleagues reach out afterwards, at that one-month follow-up visit where they're starting to hear through their nurse coordinators and stuff, oh, maybe there are some changes that may signify it. Not uncommon, right? That they're practicing the medicine and getting those medicines on board or else our team will take over and manage it. I feel like it's very rare that we're actually seeing a clinically significant worsening of encephalopathy after the procedure.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Cool. Very nice. As far as after they have their TIPS, when do they get plugged back in to your clinic? Does necessarily having a TIPS mean that, oh, you need to go back and see transplant clinic, two weeks after, one month after, or do they still just stay on their regular schedule of what they normally go?
[Dr. Tom Leventhal]
They actually, they'll stay on their regular schedule and I think a lot of that has to do with the trust and I think the aggressive medical management on the IR side, seeing these patients in follow-up, I don't think happens everywhere. It might, but like in my experience, it hasn't. We feel that they are getting comprehensive care and that we know if issues come up, especially in the setting of the pandemic, virtual visits, access to the EMR, you're much more likely to get alerts from your patients, things are a little bit off. Because they had this interventional procedure, even with the known risks, it doesn't escalate our need to get them back in.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
That's great. What has the IR team done right as far as their clinic presence to make you guys feel more comfortable with, once you send them for the procedure that you understand that all that will be taken care of? I just imagine, Siobhan, maybe you guys have been very sophisticated for a long time, but I was just curious as maybe as if they've been more sophisticated in their clinic presence that's endeared them or made them more or instilled more confidence on the other side of things.
[Dr. Tom Leventhal]
Sure. I started back, I came back to the University of Minnesota in 2019 and very early on after ordering one of these, I was getting inbox alerts and messages from interventional radiology of, “oh, hey, they had their TIPS. I got their ultrasound one month post, saw them in clinic, seems like they're having lower extremity edema, are you okay with higher ordering diuretics?” It completely caught me off guard that this was even a practice that was in place, that other people were managing this stuff. I just always assumed that I'd be getting the call.
Very quickly in coming back that this was, it was, it was beyond procedural from my perspective. It was true medical management and recognition of this stuff. Then, hey, would you mind ordering the diuretics? Absolutely, that's my job. you guys don't have to worry about that, but having someone lay eyes on someone and know that and passing it along just made it so much easier and I think led to way better outcomes.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
That's great. Siobhan, from your perspective, so I also want to know like what you think is, as you've seen the practice progress and evolve, what you guys have done right? I also want to put you on the hot seat. Can you think of anything that, any missteps that y'all have had along the way that y'all have used for improvement? You know what I mean? Lessons learned.
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
I'm going to have to think about that for a minute. We make plenty of mistakes in IR.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Zero mistakes, zero mistakes.
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
No, not zero mistakes. I've got to think about that for a minute.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
What are the things that you think of as you've seen like the clinic progress or those clinical presence progress, like that y'all have done right to, I guess, have a more, I'm always trying to like push the idea that like having a procedural presence is a better thing for interventional radiology. You get better outcomes. You get better referrals. You have better relationships with your colleagues. I was just curious if y'all's practice, like if you've seen that evolve and seen that relationship build because of how clinical y'all's practice has become.
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
Yes, I've seen a distinct change in our service and our relationships with more than just hepatology. Our relationship with hepatology has been the model to do this with other procedures, partner with other clinicians. I would say predating 2015, there was a tumor conference, but outside of tumor conference, not nearly as much conversation and collaboration as there is today.
I know that, overall patient outcomes, they've always been good, but they've improved from regards to how quickly patients are managed with, maybe like Tom was mentioning, or you were mentioning, peripheral edema after their TIPS is placed. Maybe in the past, it was something that patients struggled with for, two or three months, but, we're talking to them early, seeing them upfront, recognizing that this is happening, and getting them the medical management they need sooner. From that standpoint, we're leaps and bounds beyond where we were before. Our whole field is wanting to progress to this more clinical practice. This has just been a good example of how that's successful and improves patient outcomes just from, the ultimate outcome of success. You've managed their portal hypertension, but just those intricacies afterwards from a symptom management standpoint.
[Dr. Tom Leventhal]
To go to the other end of the spectrum, and I think how important the relationship is, I've gotten a call from one of our IR partners to come to the IR suite, and something that was scheduled for TIPS that day is an elective outpatient procedure. They'd gotten labs that morning, they had done their assessment and they had significant concerns about, was this someone where this procedure was going to be safe on this day.
In going there, taking a look at the labs, taking a look at the patient, and having had that longitudinal relationship saying, hey, there has been a significant clinical decline. This would not be safe right now. I don't know. I don't know. Again, don't know if that happens everywhere, but it made a big difference and probably prevented a really bad outcome.
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
I would say, missteps on our end probably is in line with the previous conversation, the times when before the close follow-up and collaboration, patients just not doing well with post-procedure symptoms. I would say that in the past was our biggest misstep, really the clinical management side, not the procedural management side. Even that close collaboration has resulted in us not placing TIPS in patients who may be on the day of, like Tom mentioned, aren't appropriate to have it done.
I think in the past we had one case where, the updating or echo we're pretty stringent about it'd be great to have it in the last six months because things change over time. One misstep I recall on our part was not having an updated echo. This was probably maybe seven years ago and not having an updated echo on a patient who went into a right heart failure after their TIPS.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
How many days a week do or days a month do you spend in clinic?
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
I have four clinic days per month.
[Dr. Chris Beck]
Okay. You do one a week basically. Then procedural the rest of the time.
[Dr. Siobhan Flanagan]
Correct.
Podcast Contributors
Dr. Thomas Leventhal
Dr. Thomas Leventhal is an associate professor of medicine at the University of Minnesota Medical School and a transplant hepatologist, gastroenterologist and critical care physician with M Health Fairview.
Dr. Siobhan Flanagan
Dr. Siobhan Flanagan is an interventional radiologist and associate professor in the Department of Radiology at the University of Minnesotat Medical Center/
Dr. Christopher Beck
Dr. Chris Beck is a practicing interventional radiologist with Regional Radiology Group in New Orleans.
Cite This Podcast
BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2024, August 13). Ep. 473 – Portal Hypertension Treatment Strategies: IR & Hepatology Perspectives [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com
Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.