BackTable / VI / Tool

AAST Liver Injury Scale Grading

Liver injuries often result from blunt or penetrating trauma. The AAST liver injury scale plays a crucial role in categorizing these injuries, guiding treatment decisions, and predicting outcomes. This quick reference explains the AAST liver injury scale, its grading system, and its implications for patient management.

What is the AAST Liver Injury Scale?

The AAST liver injury scale was developed by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) to standardize the classification of liver injuries. This scale is essential in trauma care, helping healthcare professionals communicate the severity of liver injuries and determine the appropriate treatment strategy. The scale grades liver injuries from I to V, with each grade reflecting increasing severity and complexity.

The 2018 revision of the AAST Liver Injury Grading Scale is detailed below.

AAST Liver Injury Scale

Grade I AAST Liver Injury

Minor lacerations or contusions. These injuries involve superficial tears or bruising of the liver tissue with minimal bleeding and no significant disruption to liver function.

• Subcapsular Hematoma: <10% surface area
• Laceration: capsular tear, <1 cm parenchymal depth

Grade II AAST Liver Injury

Moderate lacerations with bleeding. These injuries are more severe than Grade I and may require close monitoring but often can be managed without surgery.

• Subcapsular Hematoma: 10-50% surface area
• Intraparenchymal Hematoma: <10 cm diameter
• Laceration: capsular tear, 1-3 cm parenchymal depth, <10 cm length

Grade III AAST Liver Injury

Deep lacerations that extend into the liver parenchyma. This grade may involve significant bleeding and requires careful assessment to decide between surgical and non-surgical management.

• Subcapsular Hematoma: >50% surface area; ruptured subcapsular or parenchymal hematoma
• Intraparenchymal Hematoma: >10 cm
• Laceration: capsular tear >3 cm parenchymal depth
• Any injury in the presence of a liver vascular injury or active bleeding contained within liver parenchyma

Grade IV AAST Liver Injury

Lacerations involving major blood vessels within the liver. These injuries often lead to severe bleeding and usually require surgical intervention to control hemorrhage.

• Laceration: parenchymal disruption involving 25-75% of a hepatic lobe or involves 1-3 Couinaud segments
• Active bleeding extending beyond the liver parenchyma into the peritoneum

Grade V AAST Liver Injury

Extensive liver damage involving more than 75% of a hepatic lobe or causing major disruption of the hepatic veins or vena cava. These injuries are critical and often life-threatening.

• Laceration: parenchymal disruption involving >75% of hepatic lobe
• Vascular: juxtahepatic venous injuries (retrohepatic vena cava / central major hepatic veins)

Grading Notes

• Grade is assigned based on the highest grade assessment made on imaging, at operation, or on pathologic specimen.
• There may be more than one grade of liver injury and the injury should be classified based on the higher grade of injury.
• For multiple injuries, advance one grade up to Grade III.

Clinical Implications & Management Strategies

The management of liver injuries depends largely on the AAST grade. Lower-grade injuries (I-III) are often managed nonoperatively, especially in stable patients. This approach, known as Non-Operative Management (NOM), involves close monitoring through imaging studies, such as CT scans, and frequent clinical assessments.

For higher-grade injuries (IV-V), surgical intervention is more likely required. This might include procedures like angiography with embolization to control bleeding or more extensive surgeries to repair vascular damage. The decision between NOM and Operative Management (OM) hinges on the patient's hemodynamic stability, the extent of the liver injury, and the presence of associated complications.

Complications & Follow-Up

Liver injuries, especially higher-grade ones, are prone to complications such as bile leaks, infections, and re-bleeding. Close follow-up is critical to identify and manage these complications early. Imaging studies, particularly CT scans, are essential in monitoring the progress of these injuries and ensuring that NOM is successful when employed.

In cases where complications do arise, interventions such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for bile leaks or surgical drainage of abscesses may be necessary. The goal is to manage these complications promptly to prevent further deterioration of the patient's condition.

Key Takeaways

The AAST liver injury scale is a vital tool in the management of liver trauma, providing a standardized method to assess injury severity and guide treatment decisions. Understanding the nuances of this scale can help healthcare providers effectively treat liver injuries and optimize outcomes for patients. Regular updates and familiarity with the latest research on liver trauma management are essential for ensuring that patients receive the best possible care.

Learn more on the BackTable VI Podcast

BackTable is a knowledge resource for physicians by physicians. Get practical advice on the AAST Liver Injury Scale Grading and how to build your practice by listening to the BackTable VI Podcast, reading exclusing BackTable Articles, and following the work of our Contributors.

Ep 183 Solid Organ & Pelvic Trauma with Dr. Chris Ingraham

00:00 / 01:04

Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.